Old Guy Posted July 26 Share Posted July 26 2 hours ago, squire12 said: It depends on when the contract voids. If it voids before the franchise tag window occurs, then the player could be franchise tagged. It it voids after the franchise tag window closes, then the player can't be franchise tagged The TEAM puts in the contract when it expires with void years. Depending on that date decides when they are free to negotiate with other teams. I posted an article which explained this. It also stated the Packers could tag Love the next two years. Not to mention Derek Carr was RELEASED from his contract. It had nothing to do with void years. He would have been under contract and with the Raiders had they decided to keep him. Derek Carr contract, explained: Why Raiders released QB after failed trade to Saints | Sporting News Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wgbeethree Posted July 31 Share Posted July 31 What a carny POS! Welcome to the family. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brat&Beer Posted August 1 Share Posted August 1 Whaddya think? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arthur Penske Posted August 1 Share Posted August 1 (edited) 29 minutes ago, Brat&Beer said: Whaddya think? I normally don't care much about the colors, and I don't know if this is an unpopular opinion or not, but all whites are so dam lame. Retire them for good. Edited August 1 by Arthur Penske 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MantyWrestler Posted August 1 Share Posted August 1 44 minutes ago, Arthur Penske said: I normally don't care much about the colors, and I don't know if this is an unpopular opinion or not, but all whites are so dam lame. Retire them for good. I like it with the white helmets 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PossibleCabbage Posted August 1 Share Posted August 1 1 hour ago, Arthur Penske said: I normally don't care much about the colors, and I don't know if this is an unpopular opinion or not, but all whites are so dam lame. Retire them for good. While "all white" makes the fast guys look sleek, it makes the fatties look awful. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brat&Beer Posted August 1 Share Posted August 1 30 minutes ago, PossibleCabbage said: While "all white" makes the fast guys look sleek, it makes the fatties look awful. Kinda scary. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HokieHigh Posted August 1 Share Posted August 1 On 7/26/2024 at 3:53 PM, Old Guy said: The TEAM puts in the contract when it expires with void years. Depending on that date decides when they are free to negotiate with other teams. I posted an article which explained this. It also stated the Packers could tag Love the next two years. Not to mention Derek Carr was RELEASED from his contract. It had nothing to do with void years. He would have been under contract and with the Raiders had they decided to keep him. Derek Carr contract, explained: Why Raiders released QB after failed trade to Saints | Sporting News Maybe love did not want to be tagged. Then you are paying top 5 money for a disgruntled player. Love will put butts in seats for the next 10 years. Dont overthink it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packerraymond Posted August 1 Share Posted August 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old Guy Posted August 1 Share Posted August 1 3 hours ago, HokieHigh said: Maybe love did not want to be tagged. Then you are paying top 5 money for a disgruntled player. Love will put butts in seats for the next 10 years. Dont overthink it. My comment was a reply to someone who said the Packers couldn't have tagged Love in 2025 due to his void year. That comment was absolutely false. I wasn't discussing the merits of if Love would or wouldn't have wanted to be tagged. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old Guy Posted August 1 Share Posted August 1 34 minutes ago, Packerraymond said: Yuck! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
{Family Ghost} Posted August 1 Share Posted August 1 14 minutes ago, Old Guy said: Yuck! Yep .. terrible. The green in the helmet looks black .. doesn't match the uni green. Swing and a miss! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlexGreen#20 Posted August 1 Share Posted August 1 (edited) 52 minutes ago, Packerraymond said: If you're LaFleur, how on earth are you going to preach accountability to your players when your equipment people are coming up with this dumpster fire? Edited August 1 by AlexGreen#20 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old Guy Posted August 1 Share Posted August 1 (edited) 5 minutes ago, {Family Ghost} said: Yep .. terrible. The green in the helmet looks black .. doesn't match the uni green. Swing and a miss! The helmet has a New York Jets feel to it. For me, that is a hell no! Edited August 1 by Old Guy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThatJerkDave Posted August 1 Share Posted August 1 I don't hate it. In fact, it looks fine. There is a team called the New York Jets that have that uniform already. And that is what I don't like about it. Pretty much a logo swap and a yellow stripe to a Jets uniform. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.