champ11 Posted June 20, 2018 Share Posted June 20, 2018 45 minutes ago, CWood21 said: Sounds about right. PUMPED AND JACKED BOIS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kyle21121 Posted June 20, 2018 Share Posted June 20, 2018 So Marvin Bagley is Z-Bo 2.0? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sdrawkcab321 Posted June 20, 2018 Share Posted June 20, 2018 8 minutes ago, kyle21121 said: So Marvin Bagley is Z-Bo 2.0? In an era where zbo wouldn’t be as effective. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danger Posted June 20, 2018 Share Posted June 20, 2018 Who's Zbo? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
11sanchez11 Posted June 20, 2018 Share Posted June 20, 2018 13 minutes ago, Danger said: Who's Zbo? Zach Randolph Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
11sanchez11 Posted June 20, 2018 Share Posted June 20, 2018 26 minutes ago, kyle21121 said: So Marvin Bagley is Z-Bo 2.0? well except for the fact Bagley will be one of the better athletes in the NBA. And the other probably didn't get off the ground his whole NBA career. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KhanYouDigIt Posted June 20, 2018 Share Posted June 20, 2018 I really need Bamba to be there at 6. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texasmade Posted June 20, 2018 Share Posted June 20, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
resilient part 2 Posted June 20, 2018 Share Posted June 20, 2018 Just now, Texasmade said: Do the Knicks have the cap room to absorb Parsons contract? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texasmade Posted June 20, 2018 Share Posted June 20, 2018 17 minutes ago, resilient part 2 said: Do the Knicks have the cap room to absorb Parsons contract? They could package some contracts together if they wanted, like Tim Hardaway Jr. + filler, granted swapping one terrible contract for a less terrible, but still terrible, contract seems rather counter productive, so I dunno why Memphis would do that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seminoles1 Posted June 20, 2018 Share Posted June 20, 2018 #4 and Parsons for #9, #36, Ntilikina, Lee, and Baker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MKnight82 Posted June 20, 2018 Share Posted June 20, 2018 1 hour ago, resilient part 2 said: Do the Knicks have the cap room to absorb Parsons contract? Not without getting creative. Knicks are currently $500k over the cap. They can renounce the cap hold on Jarrett Jack for $1.5 mil in savings to be $1.0 mil under the cap. Then they can stretch Noah's awful deal, which I think would give them around $11 mil in savings this year, so that's $12 mil in cap space. Parsons costs $24.1 mil, so they still need $12.1 mil more. However, the Knicks have a $8.567 mil trade exception which I think they could utilize here. So they would just need $3.533 mil more. So I think if the Knicks include one of the following players they could afford it after stretching Noah and renouncing Jack: Lance Thomas ($7.1) Ron Baker ($4.5) Emmanuel Mudiay ($4.3) Kyle O'Quinn ($4.25) So if the Grizzlies take on one of those guys the deal should work. I think. edit - I forgot that the Knicks would have to pay the #4 pick, so the Grizz would likely have to take 2 of those. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MKnight82 Posted June 20, 2018 Share Posted June 20, 2018 2 minutes ago, seminoles1 said: #4 and Parsons for #9, #36, Ntilikina, Lee, and Baker. IMO, you aren't going to get that kind of return for any deal involving Parsons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seminoles1 Posted June 20, 2018 Share Posted June 20, 2018 36 minutes ago, MKnight82 said: IMO, you aren't going to get that kind of return for any deal involving Parsons. Thats where I start in negotiations. It would probably end up being #9, #36, Kanter, and Ron Baker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MKnight82 Posted June 20, 2018 Share Posted June 20, 2018 1 minute ago, seminoles1 said: Thats where I start in negotiations. It would probably end up being #9, #36, Kanter, and Ron Baker. Would you even want Kanter? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.