TecmoSuperJoe Posted August 1, 2018 Share Posted August 1, 2018 4 hours ago, Forge said: No one I'd be willing to offer would really move the needle in any sort of trade, I think. Be better off adding an additional pick. Someone like AA has no trade value. Trent Brown could have been that type of guy that would have helped them out, but obviously he is gone. Foster and a 1st? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fixxxer Posted August 1, 2018 Share Posted August 1, 2018 Jerry Hughes, Shaq Lawson and a 4th round pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nightmare Posted August 1, 2018 Share Posted August 1, 2018 10 hours ago, Yin-Yang said: Also, apparently Mack and the Raiders haven’t been in talks since February. Not a Gruden fan, but how could he and the rest of the FO not even come to the table in 6 months? This seems to be media nonsense. Gruden refuted the rumor that he hasn't spoken to Mack since he accepted the job, and McKenzie did the same regarding the stuff about no contract discussions taking place, saying he "will continue to talk" with Mack's agent. Don't get me wrong - as a Raiders fan, the situation is hardly ideal. It'll be tough to pay him what he wants, and with Donald also needing paid, Mack has an additional bargaining chip which is undoubtedly making things harder. But any chat about Mack or his representatives not even talking to the team look to be wildly off. Which is unsurprising, given that it's offseason and the media need something to yell about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DoleINGout Posted August 1, 2018 Share Posted August 1, 2018 Gronk for Mack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raves Posted August 1, 2018 Share Posted August 1, 2018 Marcus Davenport. Raiders get a player with similar potential as Mack coming out, though a bit more raw, on a rookie contract while the Saints get a player that can help them win a Super Bowl, or more, over the next 2-3 years that Brees will still be playing at his current level. Also Davenport cost us 2 1st round picks and a 3rd IIRC so that gives you the value. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TomRalph Posted August 1, 2018 Share Posted August 1, 2018 15 hours ago, game3525 said: Nothing. The Chargers already have Ingram and Bosa and on top of that you would have to pay Mack. Trade Ingram for Mack ??? Profit! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TomRalph Posted August 1, 2018 Share Posted August 1, 2018 2 hours ago, DoleINGout said: Gronk for Mack If we're not paying Chandler, we're definitely gonna be paying Mack. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danger Posted August 1, 2018 Share Posted August 1, 2018 This years first, next years 1st and a conditional pick depending on performance. Provided that he signs an extension. However I'm not doing this trade for the Eagles though. We tend to rotate our edge rushers more so it's better to have lots of good rushers than going all out to get a great one who isn't going to be in on ~90% of the snaps. We also wouldn't have the money to pay him. (probably won't have the money to pay Brandon Graham either) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RandyMossIsBoss Posted August 1, 2018 Share Posted August 1, 2018 To a team with the space, he is definitely worth a 2 1sts type of package, but for teams like the Eagles, taking on that inevitably large contract (and making the necessary moves to fit it) probably wouldn't even be worth a 7th. Not like the Eagles could just swap him for Cox either, as there'd be a ton of dead cap on our hands. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JJ6 Posted August 1, 2018 Share Posted August 1, 2018 Vic Beasley Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lancerman Posted August 1, 2018 Share Posted August 1, 2018 Practically nothing. Not paying him whatever he’s ultimately going to get. Maybe a rental for one year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DoleINGout Posted August 1, 2018 Share Posted August 1, 2018 1 hour ago, TomRalph said: If we're not paying Chandler, we're definitely gonna be paying Mack. If they didn't pay Gronk or Jones, and they acquire Mack, then tbey are obviously paying him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BleedTheClock Posted August 1, 2018 Share Posted August 1, 2018 17 hours ago, Jimmy Austin said: A bag of Doritos from 1975 and a poster of Mila Kunis in a bikini. That's way too much to give up for Khalil Mack. You'd have to attach a 1st round pick with Khalil Mack to get the Mila Kunis poster IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
game3525 Posted August 1, 2018 Share Posted August 1, 2018 2 hours ago, TomRalph said: Trade Ingram for Mack ??? Profit! Nah, Melvin is on a fairly manageable deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KhanYouDigIt Posted August 1, 2018 Share Posted August 1, 2018 Dante Fowler and a 1st. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.