Jump to content

πŸ¦…πŸ€  NFC East πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈπŸ†˜ | Celebrating the Cowboys' 28 Years of Sadness


Phire

Recommended Posts

Just now, EagleBlueDon said:

I'd say we got the best individual player in Dillard, but probably have the overall worst our second worst draft in the division.

We also had the worse picks outside of Dallas. Better picks is better draft class. We got some good players but I just wish Aj brown fell 3 more picks or we moved up

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Jeezla said:

Cowboys having a good draft.

Feel like they actually drafted more potentially plus-starter quality guys than we did. Hill at DT, McGovern at OG, Joe Jackson at DE, and Pollard at KR/PRΒ vs Dillard and Sanders. Β 

Couldn't disagree more. McGovern was quite overrated.Β 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/27/2019 at 4:56 PM, Danger said:

Couldn't disagree more. McGovern was quite overrated.Β 

So taking McGovern means their whole draft sucked? Or you just disagree that McGovern could be a plus starter?

Edited by Jeezla
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jeezla said:

So taking McGovern means their whole draft sucked?

No, just because I say two things, doesn't equate to I think A because of B.

Pollard was a mediocre 2nd fiddle to Darrell. Trysten Hill was a reach IMO. Joe Jackson was a good pick, but outside of that I don't see good value really.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Mastercheddaar said:

I was so happy we drafted Clayton. Only thing Sudfeld has going for him is he knows the offense and is familiar with the team. Thorton is someone who you would want to be a 2nd string.Β 

Go Birds

Master "The Haul" Cheddaar

Sudfeld has a good arm and a he's a decent athlete. He has poor field vision though. And accuracy. His accuracy was crap in college.

Edited by Jeezla
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Danger said:

No, just because I say two things, doesn't equate to I think A because of B.

Pollard was a mediocre 2nd fiddle to Darrell. Trysten Hill was a reach IMO. Joe Jackson was a good pick, but outside of that I don't see good value really.

Pollard was 3rd fiddle. More of a wide out than a RB. Averaged over 7 ypc though. You obviously didn't actually watch him.Β I'm projecting as a plus starter as a kick/punt returner, not as a RB, but I think he could be a fairly good RB based on what he did at the Senior Bowl.

Edited by Jeezla
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jeezla said:

Pollard was 3rd fiddle. More of a wide out than a RB. Averaged over 7 ypc though. I'm projecting as a plus starter as a kick/punt returner, not as a RB, but I think he could be a fairly good RB based on what he did at the Senior Bowl.

Sounds more or less like Tavon Austin to me. Really liked Henderson though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Danger said:

Sounds more or less like Tavon Austin to me. Really liked Henderson though.

I knew you never watched him lol

Also, I had Hill as the best DT available when the Boys drafted him, and I think I'm pretty damn good DT scout.

Edited by Jeezla
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Danger said:

I'm never been on keen on drafting players who didn't even start at their own college. So no, I didn't.

So you never watched Kerrith Whyte either? I think he's going to be a good #3 RBΒ for the Bears if he gets any carries. Wanted him as a UDFA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...