raidr4life Posted March 5, 2020 Share Posted March 5, 2020 I wanted Ferrell and Jacobs with our first 2 picks last year so Mayock if you are listening Ruggs and Murray please. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steins Gate Posted March 5, 2020 Share Posted March 5, 2020 2 minutes ago, raidr4life said: I wanted Ferrell and Jacobs with our first 2 picks last year so Mayock if you are listening Ruggs and Murray please. Wouldn't mind this. Or Ruggs and Queen. Only if Lamb is off the board though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BayRaider Posted March 5, 2020 Share Posted March 5, 2020 Jeudy at 12 for me (Ruggs if Jeudy is gone) and at 19 I’ll take Queen, Murray, or Delpit if Mayock feels both LBs are not good value. Mayock could have a 2nd Round Grade on both LBs for all we know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BayRaider Posted March 5, 2020 Share Posted March 5, 2020 The value at 19 is really bad outside of WR. And perhaps Mayock sees this. So if the Raiders truly are not sold on Carr, perhaps you could see a draft day shocker like: 12. QB Jordan Love 19. WR Justin Jefferson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BayRaider Posted March 5, 2020 Share Posted March 5, 2020 (edited) McShay made a $5,000 bet with fellow ESPN draft expert Mel Kiper that Love would be drafted higher than Herbert. Kipers always wrong. Good bet by McShay. Edited March 5, 2020 by BayRaider Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roi34 Posted March 5, 2020 Share Posted March 5, 2020 (edited) I'd love lamb/juedy and Trade back to 25ish and grab Murray. Edited March 5, 2020 by roi34 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaidersAreOne Posted March 5, 2020 Share Posted March 5, 2020 I think they go BPA at #12 (whoever is left over from Lamb/Jeudy) and then look to trade back at #19. MM wants that 2nd rounder back. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
agarcia34 Posted March 5, 2020 Share Posted March 5, 2020 I would go Ruggs at 12 even with Jeudy and CeeDee there. Love how he came in at 5'11 and Queen at 19. Wouldn't hate Murray at 19. I just prefer Queen because I see a much more physical LB when you watch him play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roi34 Posted March 5, 2020 Share Posted March 5, 2020 (edited) 33 minutes ago, agarcia34 said: I would go Ruggs at 12 even with Jeudy and CeeDee there. Love how he came in at 5'11 and Queen at 19. Wouldn't hate Murray at 19. I just prefer Queen because I see a much more physical LB when you watch him play. This screams letting combine change your board. Don't overthink... Get the best wrs lamb/juedy. IMO Edited March 5, 2020 by roi34 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimkelly02 Posted March 5, 2020 Share Posted March 5, 2020 39 minutes ago, roi34 said: This screams letting combine change your board. Don't overthink... Get the best wrs lamb/juedy. IMO The combine is meant to eliminate players who don’t meet thresholds indicative of success and get some athletic numbers to compare to game tape, not rest your rankings. I totally agree 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
agarcia34 Posted March 5, 2020 Share Posted March 5, 2020 40 minutes ago, roi34 said: This screams letting combine change your board. Don't overthink... Get the best wrs lamb/juedy. IMO Ehhhh, not really. I have always favored Jeudy, but I knew Ruggs was fast so nothing changed for me. What change it for me is the size difference between the three is not as big as I thought. I would rather take Ruggs over the other two because his game fits better with where the NFL game is trending and his strength is where our weakness on offense is. I just don't think there is a big difference between the 3 and in that case, I would go with the WR who can take the top off the defense. I also don't think CeeDee will be there at 12 anyways so. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raidr4life Posted March 5, 2020 Share Posted March 5, 2020 1 hour ago, roi34 said: This screams letting combine change your board. Don't overthink... Get the best wrs lamb/juedy. IMO Actually not true tons of people mentioned Ruggs before the combine because of our need for speed. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drfrey13 Posted March 5, 2020 Share Posted March 5, 2020 2 hours ago, agarcia34 said: Ehhhh, not really. I have always favored Jeudy, but I knew Ruggs was fast so nothing changed for me. What change it for me is the size difference between the three is not as big as I thought. I would rather take Ruggs over the other two because his game fits better with where the NFL game is trending and his strength is where our weakness on offense is. I just don't think there is a big difference between the 3 and in that case, I would go with the WR who can take the top off the defense. I also don't think CeeDee will be there at 12 anyways so. Does anyone know if we measure standing reach. You have height and arm length but standing reach is a much better indicator. I would also like to know how much a player can squat, hip thrust, and clean more so than bench. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bitty 2.0 Posted March 5, 2020 Share Posted March 5, 2020 I’m calling it now we’re going to trade back with the 12th picK and either get a second on the third. Then pick LB and CB in the first and WR in the second and third. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roi34 Posted March 5, 2020 Share Posted March 5, 2020 9 hours ago, agarcia34 said: Ehhhh, not really. I have always favored Jeudy, but I knew Ruggs was fast so nothing changed for me. What change it for me is the size difference between the three is not as big as I thought. I would rather take Ruggs over the other two because his game fits better with where the NFL game is trending and his strength is where our weakness on offense is. I just don't think there is a big difference between the 3 and in that case, I would go with the WR who can take the top off the defense. I also don't think CeeDee will be there at 12 anyways so. I get what your saying, ruggs has game changing speed. But juedy is no slow poke. Even Lamb isn't a plodder. Those guys also do well with ball in their hands at making people miss. I like ruggs depending on how board falls. Prefer ruggs in trade down or if other two are off board though. Juedy is probably the most polished of all 3, lamb is better at contested grabs of the 3. And ruggs obviously game changing speed and great hands but little more raw in route tree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts