Jump to content

Nacho Simulation Football League (Season 19 - Taco Bowl XIX POSTED)


TheKillerNacho

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, RuskieTitan said:

I bet you would, Mr Pick 20.

Which is why I’m taking the same round instead of a round higher like everyone asks for?

You can either trade your S20 second rounder for 2.20 or for 3.6. Seems like the former is a better deal, but maybe I’m wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, pwny said:

Which is why I’m taking the same round instead of a round higher like everyone asks for?

You can either trade your S20 second rounder for 2.20 or for 3.6. Seems like the former is a better deal, but maybe I’m wrong.

Yeah but the team picking 3.6 is less likely to be a threat for the playoffs so that would make more sense than ever trading with someone who picked 20.

Am I doing that right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since so many of us have gone international - it must be brutal for our teams to travel. How would you dice up the league if you were to realign?

*Note - just for fun, not actually suggesting realignment

 

Euro Division (Blue)

Reykjavik Direwolves
Norway Knights
Southview Saints
Freiburg Venom
Egypt Starfells (I realize this is cheating, but they are on the Mediterranean, so whatevs)

 

The South Division (Red)

South Africa Woolley Mammoths
Rio de Janeiro Pirates
Miami Sharks
Rocket City Trash Pandas
Little Rock Uni Royals

 

The Rust Belt Division (Brown)

Chicago Fire
Indianapolis Predators
Iowa Jagwads
Scranton Papermakers
Richmond Flying Squirrels (Another liberty, but again, I don't care)

 

The West Division (Green)

Anchorage Eskimos
Seattle Sonics
Tacoma Thunder

Phoenix Rattlers
Hanoi Viet Kong (So far East that I am calling them "West")

Edited by Tk3
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, EaglesPeteC said:

Sliders question.

Is there a slider that would impact more passing game targets going to TE and/or RB over WR? 

 

2 hours ago, Malfatron said:

im guessing a lower aggression would in part determine that, but i will let the experts weigh in

I believe this is correct. Less aggression leads to more check downs to TEs and RBs.

Pretty sure @khodder asked this once to figure out how to get Kelce the ball more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...