Nacho Simulation Football League (Season 21 - Taco Bowl XXI POSTED!)

[Glen]

Glem #4 baybeeee

[Glen]

I appreciate it tk3

[Tk3]

26 minutes ago, swoosh said:

This is unlike any other league though. You're trying to fit a square peg into a round hole. Why should my S20 squad play any role (let alone the majority) in the rankings this year? Did you see my squad last year? A college team would've beat it. 

Stick to running pwny's. 

Why are you mad at me that you made a crappy team last year? If you don't like it, then ignore it and create your own rankings

I never saw you as such a horrific whiner

[swoosh]

3 minutes ago, Tk3 said:

Why are you mad at me that you made a crappy team last year? If you don't like it, then ignore it and create your own rankings

I never saw you as such a horrific whiner

Oh man, is there what we're resorting to now? But for the record, I am so mad I built a crappy team last year. I thought surely by trading away all my draft picks for future picks would result in back to back championships. I never saw that disaster of a year happening. Bad luck. 

I was just pointing out what I view as flaws in using it in a league where the roster turnover is 75% +. It's just my own opinions. Others seem to enjoy it. You didn't create the logic - you're just applying it. No need to take it so personal. 

[Tk3]

15 minutes ago, swoosh said:

Oh man, is there what we're resorting to now? But for the record, I am so mad I built a crappy team last year. I thought surely by trading away all my draft picks for future picks would result in back to back championships. I never saw that disaster of a year happening. Bad luck. 

I was just pointing out what I view as flaws in using it in a league where the roster turnover is 75% +. It's just my own opinions. Others seem to enjoy it. You didn't create the logic - you're just applying it. No need to take it so personal. 

The amount that I discounted it from post season S20 to preseason S21 was larger than the amount 538 does for the NFL

That was the attempt to account for the high turnover. Last season was wonky because people did outlandish things (not targeting you - several people made choices with their picks that they otherwise would not have). I don't know why I should change everything and tune it up by numerous factors just because one owner did a tank harder than historical examples making their starting point out of line. I could start it at 1,500 for this season, but that's not the point of how its supposed to work. If you have a worse team in one season, the model assumes that you are carrying over a worse team. 

Literally every week the effect lessens because your starting point was lower. Therefore you either get more points for winning, or lose fewer points for losing, because you are viewed in the model as more of an underdog than you should be. It works itself out over time.

Records and points are posted on the front page and the stat page. This is simply an attempt to do something additional.

[Tk3]

I agree that the PWNY is the prime metric. Especially since it has the historical component that compares over the history of the league. In the past @pwny has done the PWNY and I just decide to do something different for something to do and for an additional piece of talking point in the downtime between the weeks

If people don't like it I can pick up the PWNY if @pwny is not going to be paying attention or wanting to keep tabs on the league

[pwny]

2 hours ago, Tk3 said:

I agree that the PWNY is the prime metric. Especially since it has the historical component that compares over the history of the league. In the past @pwny has done the PWNY and I just decide to do something different for something to do and for an additional piece of talking point in the downtime between the weeks

If people don't like it I can pick up the PWNY if @pwny is not going to be paying attention or wanting to keep tabs on the league

If you want to take over it, you're welcome to. If I did it anymore, it would at most be at the end of the season or even just annually, just to make sure the data is recorded. But I won't be doing weekly rankings or anything like that. If I had that kind of time and energy to devote to the league anymore, I'd still have my team.

[Scalamania]

7 hours ago, Tk3 said:

The pwny for those who want it. @pwny using 5.3 is correct?

 

Owner	Team	PWNY	Wins	Loss	Win %	Net	PF	PA	OR	DR	LUCK
SirA	Freiburg Venom	15.131	1	0	1.000	10	24	14	10	1	0.054
TK3	Reykjavík Direwolves	14.845	1	0	1.000	13	34	21	2	7	0.072
Rammy	Egypt Starfalls	14.572	1	0	1.000	11	31	20	6	4	0.089
Glem	Little Rock Uni Royals	13.784	1	0	1.000	7	24	17	10	2	0.139
Swoosh	Richmond Flying Squirrels	13.503	1	0	1.000	9	33	24	5	9	0.156
Ruskie	Rio de Janeiro Pirates	12.890	1	0	1.000	8	34	26	2	13	0.194
Counselor	Anchorage Moose	12.811	1	0	1.000	6	26	20	7	4	0.199
Malfatron	Norway Knights	11.247	1	0	1.000	6	40	34	1	17	0.297
Khodder	Tacoma Thunder	11.247	1	0	1.000	3	20	17	15	2	0.297
Remixxx	Scranton Papermakers	9.739	1	0	1.000	2	25	23	9	8	0.391
RMIB	Indianapolis Predators	6.261	0	1	0.000	-2	23	25	13	12	-0.391
Bucsfan	Phoenix Rattlers	4.753	0	1	0.000	-6	34	40	2	20	-0.297
Rackcs	Chicago Fire	4.753	0	1	0.000	-3	17	20	18	4	-0.297
Josh	Lancaster Fighting Amish	3.189	0	1	0.000	-6	20	26	15	13	-0.199
Ravens	Hanoi Viet Kongs	3.110	0	1	0.000	-8	26	34	7	17	-0.194
YoungBucs	Miami Sharks	2.497	0	1	0.000	-9	24	33	10	16	-0.156
Whickok	Pittsburgh Punishers	2.216	0	1	0.000	-7	17	24	18	9	-0.139
EaglesPete	Rocket City Trash Pandas	1.428	0	1	0.000	-11	20	31	15	15	-0.089
Mookie	South Africa Woolly Mammoths	1.155	0	1	0.000	-13	21	34	14	17	-0.072
The Orca	Antarctica Penguin Poppers	0.869	0	1	0.000	-10	14	24	20	9	-0.054

@EaglesPeteC not in last? These rankings are flawed. 

[EaglesPeteC]

6 minutes ago, Scalamania said:

@EaglesPeteC not in last? These rankings are flawed. 

[bucsfan333]

Yeah. My defense got ******* rekt. I couldn't stop a damn thing. AND my special teams gave up a TD. 

[Malfatron]

I like those rankings much better.

i do feel like an 8th ranked team, and not a 1st.

my defense got torched for 3 tds by cousins, and I needed all of that 40 points to win.

Thankfully i drafted this guy

Jamal Agnew [1 GS]: 8 returns for 209 yards (26.12 YPR, 83 LNG), 1 touchdown.

Edited March 27, 2021 by Malfatron

[Malfatron]

Im going to make a power ranking metric that focuses on efficiency.

Lets see how things shake up.

Formula:

( 10 x YPC (offense) + Passer Rating (offense) + 2 X Avg Pts/Game Scored) – (10 X OPP YPC (defense) + OPP Passer Rating (defense)+ 2 X OPP Avg Pts/Game)

 

[Scoundrel]

Why does anyone care about rankings in this league when everything is simmed? Why does it matter?

[Malfatron]

1 hour ago, Malfatron said:

Im going to make a power ranking metric that focuses on efficiency.

Lets see how things shake up.

Formula:

( 10 x YPC (offense) + Passer Rating (offense) + 2 X Avg Pts/Game Scored) – (10 X OPP YPC (defense) + OPP Passer Rating (defense)+ 2 X OPP Avg Pts/Game)

 

 

1. (Y)Freiburg Venom (1-0): 60.89

2. (Y)Egypt Starfells (1-0): 39.76

3. (G)Rich Flying Squirrels (1-0): 36.13

4. (R)Reykjavík Direwolves (1-0): 34.08

5. (R) Rio Pirates (1-0): 33.91

6. (B)Little Rock Uni Royals (1-0): 24.69

7. (B)Tacoma Thunder (1-0): 23.6

8. (B)Norway Knights (1-0): 12.11

9. (B)Anchorage Moose (1-0): 3.8

10. (Y)Indianapolis Predators (0-1): 2.91

11. (G)Scr Papermakers (1-0): (-2.91)

12. (R)Lanc Fighting Amish (0-1): (-3.8)

13. (G)Phoenix Rattlers (0-1): (-12.11)

14. (B)Chicago Fire (0-1): (-23.6)

15. (G)Pitt Punishers (0-1): (-24.69)

16. (R) Hanoi Viet Kongs (0-1): (-33.91)

17. (R) SA Mammoths (0-1):  (- 34.08)

18. (G)Miami Sharks(0-1): (-36.13)

19. (Y) RCTrash Pandas(0-1): (-39.76)

20. (Y) Ant. P Poppers (0-1): (-60.89)

Edited March 27, 2021 by Malfatron

[Scoundrel]

5 minutes ago, Malfatron said:

 

1. Freiburg Venom (1-0): 60.89

2. Egypt Starfells (1-0): 39.76

3. Richmond Flying Squirrels (1-0): 36.13

4. Reykjavík Direwolves (1-0): 34.08

5. Rio Pirates (1-0): 33.91

6. Little Rock Uni Royals (1-0): 24.69

7. Tacoma Thunder (1-0): 23.6

8. Norway Knights (1-0): 12.11

9. Anchorage Moose (1-0): 3.8

10. Indianapolis Predators (0-1): 2.91

11. Scranton Papermakers (1-0): (-2.91)

12. Lancaster Fighting Amish (0-1): (-3.8)

13. Phoenix Rattlers (0-1): (-12.11)

14. Chicago Fire (0-1): (-23.6)

15. Pittsburgh Punishers (0-1): (-24.69)

16. Hanoi Viet Kongs (0-1): (-33.91)

17. SA Woolly Mammoths (0-1):  (- 34.08)

18. Miami Sharks(0-1): (-36.13)

19. Rocket City Trash Pandas(0-1): (-39.76)

20. Ant. Penguin Poppers (0-1): (-60.89)

 

7 minutes ago, Scoundrel said:

Why does anyone care about rankings in this league when everything is simmed? Why does it matter?

Whoot I’m in the top half!