vegas492 Posted March 13, 2023 Share Posted March 13, 2023 4 minutes ago, skibrett15 said: getting a rookie qb in this draft with a top pick is probably better than Love considering the longer window of the rookie contract. Even if love plays decent to good he'll command a Daniel Jones type deal which is not a good start to building a SB winner. If he plays great he'll be more in the Lamar Jackson range which is even tougher. I'd deal Love for a top rookie QB unless you think he's as good as Josh Allen or the QBs in this class are all trash. I'm not taking any of the QB's from this draft. I feel Love is better than they are...and he's not much older, if he even is older. The issue is paying him. In @incognito_man 's post, he referenced something like "if you think Love is the next Rodgers". If you think that highly of Love, you are simply not trading him for that pick. The issue is whether or not Love is the next Rodgers. Very few are. But there could be one next year...which is why I'd consider that trade. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PossibleCabbage Posted March 13, 2023 Share Posted March 13, 2023 I mean, it was never necessary for Rodgers to tell the media what he wants to do. He can tell the Jets and the Packers and let them figure it out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
incognito_man Posted March 13, 2023 Share Posted March 13, 2023 1 minute ago, Laces Out said: This is exactly the reason his existence on the roster, in addition to other issues of punting that draft completely while trying to win a SB, is malpractice. Ya'll hate $50 mil average for an aging HoFer a year removed from a double MVP campaign? Well average to below average QB's just set the market for close to $40, THIS yer... that cost only goes the F up from there. We won a SB with Aaron on his 2nd contract, coming off an almost identical path as Love. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lodestar Posted March 13, 2023 Share Posted March 13, 2023 Just now, {Family Ghost} said: Sounds like a good thing. Trey is in the know at times. IIRC he was the one who broke Rodgers talking to the Jets in the first place. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LacyIsGood Posted March 13, 2023 Share Posted March 13, 2023 6 minutes ago, skibrett15 said: getting a rookie qb in this draft with a top pick is probably better than Love considering the longer window of the rookie contract. Even if love plays decent to good he'll command a Daniel Jones type deal which is not a good start to building a SB winner. If he plays great he'll be more in the Lamar Jackson range which is even tougher. I'd deal Love for a top rookie QB unless you think he's as good as Josh Allen or the QBs in this class are all trash. I disagree. If Love looks the part early on, I think they extend him midseason and get a bargain. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
packfanfb Posted March 13, 2023 Share Posted March 13, 2023 Boom. Wingo is trustworthy. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vegas492 Posted March 13, 2023 Share Posted March 13, 2023 4 minutes ago, Arthur Penske said: Done? #FAKETWEET It got all of you. But not me.... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
incognito_man Posted March 13, 2023 Share Posted March 13, 2023 Just now, vegas492 said: I'm not taking any of the QB's from this draft. I feel Love is better than they are...and he's not much older, if he even is older. The issue is paying him. In @incognito_man 's post, he referenced something like "if you think Love is the next Rodgers". If you think that highly of Love, you are simply not trading him for that pick. The issue is whether or not Love is the next Rodgers. Very few are. But there could be one next year...which is why I'd consider that trade. The issue is the confidence interval. Are you more confident that Love is the next Rodgers or that Stroud/Young/Richardson are? Or the combined probability someone next year is AND you'll be able to get them? The answer appears to easily be: Love. Love is all you need. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PossibleCabbage Posted March 13, 2023 Share Posted March 13, 2023 1 minute ago, packfanfb said: Boom. Wingo is trustworthy. Can you still pay for verification on twitter? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donzo Posted March 13, 2023 Share Posted March 13, 2023 7 minutes ago, hitnhope said: Love has 1 quarter of good game tape. Everything else out there is pretty mediocre to poor. Yep, and that's being generous. Love's "good quarter" was hitting a wide open Watson 10 yards in front of him and letting Watson do his thing. Everything else, three years of miserable QBing, has been a Three Stooges routine of awful QB play. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leader Posted March 13, 2023 Share Posted March 13, 2023 1 minute ago, incognito_man said: The issue is the confidence interval. Are you more confident that Love is the next Rodgers or that Stroud/Young/Richardson are? Or the combined probability someone next year is AND you'll be able to get them? The answer appears to easily be: Love. Love is all you need. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vegas492 Posted March 13, 2023 Share Posted March 13, 2023 1 minute ago, incognito_man said: The issue is the confidence interval. Are you more confident that Love is the next Rodgers or that Stroud/Young/Richardson are? Or the combined probability someone next year is AND you'll be able to get them? The answer appears to easily be: Love. Love is all you need. No, Love is what I'm gonna get. In the hypothetical, I'm taking the picks and loading up for next year. Because I'll have Rodgers for one, maybe two years. But let's see what happens. I think Jordan has a chance to be quite good. He also has a chance to be pretty terrible. And a chance to be in the middle. So I'll be right on one of those statements. I win! Yeah! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arthur Penske Posted March 13, 2023 Share Posted March 13, 2023 2 minutes ago, packfanfb said: Boom. Wingo is trustworthy. Let it be known to FF history that this wasn’t boom and I beat packerfanfb on this breaking news 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beekay414 Posted March 13, 2023 Share Posted March 13, 2023 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vegas492 Posted March 13, 2023 Share Posted March 13, 2023 Just now, PossibleCabbage said: Can you still pay for verification on twitter? I've made fake tweets before. Pretty simple. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.