Sugashane Posted March 13, 2023 Share Posted March 13, 2023 27 minutes ago, Nabbs4u said: Do they though? They just signed two legit LB for the price of Roquan, plus still have thier 2nd rd draft pick to use. Thier not! 3 for 1 combo In all fairness Roquan has 3 separate personalities when not medicated, so he is his own 3-for-1 combo. So who really got more? Honestly though Smith was never a problem on the field, off the field he was a child. Poles wasn't having it and moved on. I hope he does well for BAL, just not if/when they play CHI. lol 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trentwannabe Posted March 13, 2023 Share Posted March 13, 2023 Happy for Edmunds. Classy player who deserves to get paid on the open market. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BetterCallSaul Posted March 13, 2023 Share Posted March 13, 2023 Just now, Trentwannabe said: Happy for Edmunds. Classy player who deserves to get paid on the open market. I think he fleeced the Bears. He’s a solid linebacker that’s being paid like an elite one due to age, size, and athleticism. He is wild and reckless in his run fits & is routinely out of position. Not what I like in a linebacker personally. He can do everything you ask him to do, but not with any consistency. He’s like the polar opposite of Jack Sanborn & TJ Edwards. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StLunatic88 Posted March 13, 2023 Share Posted March 13, 2023 4 minutes ago, BetterCallSaul said: I think he fleeced the Bears. He’s a solid linebacker that’s being paid like an elite one due to age, size, and athleticism. He is wild and reckless in his run fits & is routinely out of position. Not what I like in a linebacker personally. He can do everything you ask him to do, but not with any consistency. He’s like the polar opposite of Jack Sanborn & TJ Edwards. SO if you already have those two players, and have a bunch of Cash that you must spend (by NFL rule) then why not take the shot on the extremely toolsy young guy that if you can harness could be a big time impact player? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BetterCallSaul Posted March 13, 2023 Share Posted March 13, 2023 3 minutes ago, StLunatic88 said: SO if you already have those two players, and have a bunch of Cash that you must spend (by NFL rule) then why not take the shot on the extremely toolsy young guy that if you can harness could be a big time impact player? Because you could use that money on like 2-3 solid players that you know are gonna be serviceable. Again, he’s not bad. But the idea that he’s this superstar LB is wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StLunatic88 Posted March 13, 2023 Share Posted March 13, 2023 1 minute ago, BetterCallSaul said: Because you could use that money on like 2-3 solid players that you know are gonna be serviceable. Again, he’s not bad. But the idea that he’s this superstar LB is wrong. Guess what... We still have plenty of money to do that in addition to this move 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KhanYouDigIt Posted March 13, 2023 Share Posted March 13, 2023 Uhh ok. Should have just kept and paid Roquan. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TankWilliams Posted March 13, 2023 Share Posted March 13, 2023 2 minutes ago, KhanYouDigIt said: Uhh ok. Should have just kept and paid Roquan. glad to see an original take in this thread 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Ramster Posted March 13, 2023 Share Posted March 13, 2023 But why? They were doing so good.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BetterCallSaul Posted March 13, 2023 Share Posted March 13, 2023 5 minutes ago, StLunatic88 said: Guess what... We still have plenty of money to do that in addition to this move Ok. Good job then Bears. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
INbengalfan Posted March 13, 2023 Share Posted March 13, 2023 49 minutes ago, Ray Reed said: Roquan got 60mil guaranteed for a 5 year deal I don’t think 50mil guaranteed over 4 for Edmunds supports that math of those 2 LBs being cheaper. It may but I doubt it Besides stop trying to ruin my ex gf analogy Aas long as we get to point out that the current agent-less GF is wreaking all kinds of havoc 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sparky151 Posted March 13, 2023 Share Posted March 13, 2023 47 minutes ago, BetterCallSaul said: I think he fleeced the Bears. He’s a solid linebacker that’s being paid like an elite one due to age, size, and athleticism. He is wild and reckless in his run fits & is routinely out of position. Not what I like in a linebacker personally. He can do everything you ask him to do, but not with any consistency. He’s like the polar opposite of Jack Sanborn & TJ Edwards. So the anti Jack Campbell? Bears could have spent the money better going after Hargrave. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pool Posted March 13, 2023 Share Posted March 13, 2023 32 minutes ago, sparky151 said: So the anti Jack Campbell? Bears could have spent the money better going after Hargrave. They want Jones Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrry32 Posted March 13, 2023 Share Posted March 13, 2023 1 hour ago, StLunatic88 said: Guess what... We still have plenty of money to do that in addition to this move We? You're a Bears fan? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soko Posted March 13, 2023 Share Posted March 13, 2023 Did you guys know that the Bears traded Roquan Smith prior to signing Edmunds at MLB? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.