NightTrainLane Posted December 2, 2017 Share Posted December 2, 2017 10 hours ago, Rich7sena said: I mean, Richardson is currently the WR 2/3 for the Seahawks with a healthy Lockett and Baldwin. I don’t think Wilson makes Richardson. In a lot of plays this season, Richardson bails out Wilson when he throws those 50/50 (also plays the Raiders receivers aren’t consistently converting). It’s tough to know what kind of player Richardson would be in a more structured offense, but I do see the skills of a good NFL receiver regardless. From what you're saying their play styles definitely mesh. Whether Richardson is good or not is still yet to be proven production wise and the fact that he is thin and already had multiple serious knee and leg injuries in his short NFL and college career are heavy strikes that would seriously factor in on any kind of deal regardless of how he adjust to throw or what not. Just not the type of guy I'd add to this core especially with the scenario that I mentioned I like to see us move to with the position. Just doesn't fit the team or the QB. But I'm sure he has made some plays. He wouldn't be getting snaps otherwise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rich7sena Posted December 2, 2017 Share Posted December 2, 2017 4 hours ago, NightTrainLane said: From what you're saying their play styles definitely mesh. Whether Richardson is good or not is still yet to be proven production wise and the fact that he is thin and already had multiple serious knee and leg injuries in his short NFL and college career are heavy strikes that would seriously factor in on any kind of deal regardless of how he adjust to throw or what not. Just not the type of guy I'd add to this core especially with the scenario that I mentioned I like to see us move to with the position. Just doesn't fit the team or the QB. But I'm sure he has made some plays. He wouldn't be getting snaps otherwise. Your pronoun game is confusing me. Whose styles mesh? I'm confident and already convinced Richardson is a good player. The real question for me is: how good? His injury history would make him more affordable and thus more attractive. I believe he is at least twice the player Seth Roberts is and can be had for less than twice the asking price. And like I said, Richardson does fit with the team (as it currently stands) and quarterback. His ball skills align with how Carr plays (back shoulders, precise 50/50 balls). Plus he's already everything the staff hoped Roberts to be; a guy who can be a mismatch for slot corners and take advantage of single coverage afforded to him by the presence of Cooper and Crabtree. Do I think Landry is a better player than Richardson? Yes. He's both a better player and different player. While I believe Richardson better compliments Carr's game I would rather have Landry. That said, I'm fairly certain Landry will easy cost $10+ million looking at comparable players entering free agency. I'm not sure I'd want Landry at the price as it would limit what the team could do on defense in free agency. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IdigtheRaiders! Posted December 2, 2017 Share Posted December 2, 2017 NYG's offense is just as bad as Denver's, and their defense is even worse than ours. We beat Denver without Coop and Crab, so there's no excuse not to beat NYG tomorrow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NightTrainLane Posted December 2, 2017 Share Posted December 2, 2017 43 minutes ago, Rich7sena said: Your pronoun game is confusing me. Whose styles mesh? I'm confident and already convinced Richardson is a good player. The real question for me is: how good? His injury history would make him more affordable and thus more attractive. I believe he is at least twice the player Seth Roberts is and can be had for less than twice the asking price. And like I said, Richardson does fit with the team (as it currently stands) and quarterback. His ball skills align with how Carr plays (back shoulders, precise 50/50 balls). Plus he's already everything the staff hoped Roberts to be; a guy who can be a mismatch for slot corners and take advantage of single coverage afforded to him by the presence of Cooper and Crabtree. Do I think Landry is a better player than Richardson? Yes. He's both a better player and different player. While I believe Richardson better compliments Carr's game I would rather have Landry. That said, I'm fairly certain Landry will easy cost $10+ million looking at comparable players entering free agency. I'm not sure I'd want Landry at the price as it would limit what the team could do on defense in free agency. Who I was talking about talking about in terms of styles...Wilson and Richardson. Like I said before I wasn't talking about something that I think the team will do. I was throwing out a scenario I'd like to see for the position. In that scenario Landry's money would come from Crab and Roberts relinquished salary. If you want to say that Landry is better and different than Richardson than the same applies to Richardson and Roberts on a MUCH smaller scales in the better category. They both have pluses and minus to them that need to be considered. And while Richardson's price would be reduced due to his intensive injury history, if we are really talking about the team dumping Roberts for Richardson, if you really think Richardson isn't gonna get adeal comparable or probably even better than 3yrs 12mil than I don't know what to tell ya? I don't see Richardson being as of threat in the slot as 4-5 other guys that will be on the market if we're looking or as being worth the risk for the price he will demand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nightmare Posted December 3, 2017 Share Posted December 3, 2017 15 hours ago, IdigtheRaiders! said: NYG's offense is just as bad as Denver's, and their defense is even worse than ours. We beat Denver without Coop and Crab, so there's no excuse not to beat NYG tomorrow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dessie Posted December 3, 2017 Share Posted December 3, 2017 Amerson out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G Posted December 3, 2017 Share Posted December 3, 2017 We have better players and are healthier than the Giants. We should win even without our starting WR's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SBXISBXVSBXVIII Posted December 3, 2017 Share Posted December 3, 2017 Win and tied for 1st. Let’s go boys Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SilverNBlackFan Posted December 3, 2017 Author Share Posted December 3, 2017 Jalen Richard awful PR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SilverNBlackFan Posted December 3, 2017 Author Share Posted December 3, 2017 Beast mode baby Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaiderX Posted December 3, 2017 Share Posted December 3, 2017 Forgot the Giants run D wasn' very good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DallasRaider Posted December 3, 2017 Share Posted December 3, 2017 Beast mode! I notice everyone looks more hype then usual! Keep it up ✊✊✊✊ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrOaktown_56 Posted December 3, 2017 Share Posted December 3, 2017 I hope we hold onto Lynch for next year. He's still a good back and we don't need to create a position of need for this team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickButera Posted December 3, 2017 Share Posted December 3, 2017 Man, here I am watching the end of the chiefs lose wondering why the heck CBS isn't switching to the raiders game.... And it's on fox. And I missed the TD run. Anyone find a link to the highlight? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaidersAreOne Posted December 3, 2017 Share Posted December 3, 2017 Lynch hurt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.