coachbuns Posted December 20, 2020 Share Posted December 20, 2020 5 minutes ago, Kepler said: You have the period. He's fine. Again, if somebody doesn't agree with your thoughts ... nasty, nasty. Grow up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coachbuns Posted December 20, 2020 Share Posted December 20, 2020 Just now, Spartacus said: Sullivan has had his struggles this year. With a lock down corner in Alexander on the other side they are bound to pick on our #2 no matter how he is playing. Time to upgrade next year then. Probably going to happen unless King not playing that well takes a 1 year cheaper deal or he won't be resigned. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWood21 Posted December 20, 2020 Share Posted December 20, 2020 11 minutes ago, Kepler said: You have the period. He's fine. Really not appropriate. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Refugee Posted December 20, 2020 Share Posted December 20, 2020 I think King is important to our defense playing the way we will need to if we want to go all the way. He was playing stronger before his absence and still has been listed with a groin and achilles injury ever since. No one is 100% this time of year but a corner on an island will have any deficiencies exposed. Next week, we'll need everyone in run support, I hope he's feeling a bit more confident. The bye would be very nice for a team that had the last one in week 5. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spartacus Posted December 20, 2020 Share Posted December 20, 2020 24 minutes ago, coachbuns said: Time to upgrade next year then. Probably going to happen unless King not playing that well takes a 1 year cheaper deal or he won't be resigned. How do you expect to upgrade? King is a solid #2 corner. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kepler Posted December 20, 2020 Share Posted December 20, 2020 22 minutes ago, CWood21 said: Really not appropriate. What are you talking about? Did you read what I quoted? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kepler Posted December 20, 2020 Share Posted December 20, 2020 29 minutes ago, coachbuns said: Again, if somebody doesn't agree with your thoughts ... nasty, nasty. Grow up. You're too sensitive and read too much negativity into things. Grow up yourself. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leader Posted December 21, 2020 Author Share Posted December 21, 2020 Tom Silverstein - OK, with Saints (10-4) losing, Packers (11-3) can clinch homefield with two victories or victory over Bears in Week 17. Doesn't matter what else happens with Seahawks (10-4), Rams (9-5) or Saints in either of those scenarios. (Please prove me wrong, if I am) Bill Huber - No. 1 seed is there for the grabbing now. Could lose to Titans and it wouldn’t matter. 👍 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spartacus Posted December 21, 2020 Share Posted December 21, 2020 1 minute ago, Leader said: Tom Silverstein - OK, with Saints (10-4) losing, Packers (11-3) can clinch homefield with two victories or victory over Bears in Week 17. Doesn't matter what else happens with Seahawks (10-4), Rams (9-5) or Saints in either of those scenarios. (Please prove me wrong, if I am) Bill Huber - No. 1 seed is there for the grabbing now. Could lose to Titans and it wouldn’t matter. 👍 It would be so much sweeter to beat the Titans and have that Chicago game mean nothing. Would be great for the injured guys on the team. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sasquatch Posted December 21, 2020 Share Posted December 21, 2020 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacReady Posted December 21, 2020 Share Posted December 21, 2020 Just now, Sasquatch said: No, Adrian, just my own team’s defensive coordinator. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
packfanfb Posted December 21, 2020 Share Posted December 21, 2020 1 hour ago, Spartacus said: It would be so much sweeter to beat the Titans and have that Chicago game mean nothing. Would be great for the injured guys on the team. Start Love and let him throw 6 TDs against the Bears. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coachbuns Posted December 21, 2020 Share Posted December 21, 2020 7 hours ago, Kepler said: You're too sensitive and read too much negativity into things. Grow up yourself. Yah right. LOL ... mirror time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
incognito_man Posted December 21, 2020 Share Posted December 21, 2020 1 hour ago, Leader said: Tom Silverstein - OK, with Saints (10-4) losing, Packers (11-3) can clinch homefield with two victories or victory over Bears in Week 17. Doesn't matter what else happens with Seahawks (10-4), Rams (9-5) or Saints in either of those scenarios. (Please prove me wrong, if I am) Bill Huber - No. 1 seed is there for the grabbing now. Could lose to Titans and it wouldn’t matter. 👍 We can also win the #1 seed by beating TEN and lose to bears (if other things happen). So the TEN game matters. Or likely will still at the time we play it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spartacus Posted December 21, 2020 Share Posted December 21, 2020 (edited) 10 minutes ago, incognito_man said: We can also win the #1 seed by beating TEN and lose to bears (if other things happen). So the TEN game matters. Or likely will still at the time we play it. I dont know why everyone is writing off the Titans game. Rodgers and that offense is going to be pissed about last week and the defense has steadily improved over the last few weeks. There is a chance to win that. Edited December 21, 2020 by Spartacus Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.