Slinky Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 1 minute ago, CWood21 said: Based on? The fact that Schneider and McKenzie declined interviews? If those 2 were available, do you really think Gute would still be the hire? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cannondale Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 Just now, Slinky said: If those 2 were available, do you really think Gute would still be the hire? No one knows, including you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slinky Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 3 minutes ago, Leader said: I'm a bit mystifyed with all these Gute was the 3rd, 4th, 5th thru 9th choice. Where are these tea leaves coming from? If he was so far down the list - why didnt they let him enjoy a pleasant interview with Texas? Somethings not computing. My left brains not connecting with my right side...... Because there were 4 other guys the Packers wanted to interview, but were denied. 2 of them would've been chosen over Gute, no doubt about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rodjahs12 Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 10 minutes ago, cannondale said: Cool I still want Scott back and I'm willing to pay his bar tab at Stir Ups for a year to make it happen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Green19 Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chillparsi1 Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 I have no reason to think positively or negatively about this guy. As a TT fan, I like that we went with someone straight off the tree here. I only really am familiar with him from his draft press conferences. Here's a few - it'd be grasping at straws to try and conclude anything about the hire from these, but just for interest/familiarity purposes. http://www.packers.com/media-center/videos/Gutekunst-on-pick-No-61-S-Josh-Jones/b0da6513-4b24-4e11-92a7-fee10e2736ee http://www.packers.com/media-center/videos/Gutekunst-on-Spriggs-His-athleticism-stands-out/5e32d848-0f51-428d-87a6-51765ab9a47e Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slinky Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 2 minutes ago, Packerraymond said: You'll realize on here that some posters are allergic to complementing the Packers. While there are MANY here who love every single move the team makes. Neither is better than the other. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWood21 Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 Just now, Slinky said: If those 2 were available, do you really think Gute would still be the hire? IDK. I'm not going to jump to a conclusion, because it fits my argument. We don't know if they would have hired Gute over McKenzie or Schneider. But I'm getting tired of reading about how great McKenzie and Schneider, and nobody looks at their draft record. McKenzie is largely living off his Carr/Mack draft and Amari Cooper. His drafts since then? Might even be worse than Ted AND Schneider's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rodjahs12 Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 1 minute ago, Slinky said: Because there were 4 other guys the Packers wanted to interview, but were denied. 2 of them would've been chosen over Gute, no doubt about it. I'm glad we have a real life insider here to tell us what's doubtful and what isn't inside the front office. MOD EDIT - Not appropriate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leader Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 3 minutes ago, Packerraymond said: You'll realize on here that some posters are allergic to complementing the Packers. I'm aware the disease exists, trust me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWood21 Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 1 minute ago, Slinky said: Because there were 4 other guys the Packers wanted to interview, but were denied. 2 of them would've been chosen over Gute, no doubt about it. No doubt because you think so. Good to know you're back up "facts" with opinions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leader Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 3 minutes ago, CWood21 said: That doesn't mean they were the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th choices. It meant the Packers wanted to do their due diligence. Correct. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slinky Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 1 minute ago, Rodjahs12 said: I'm glad we have a real life insider here to tell us what's doubtful and what isn't inside the front office. You're welcome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tredpack Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 3 minutes ago, Slinky said: Because there were 4 other guys the Packers wanted to interview, but were denied. 2 of them would've been chosen over Gute, no doubt about it. This made me chuckle. Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slinky Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 1 minute ago, CWood21 said: No doubt because you think so. Good to know you're back up "facts" with opinions. If Gute was for sure their guy, HOW DID THEY LET HIM FLY ALL THE WAY TO HOUSTON TO INTERVIEW WITH THE TEXANS BEFORE THEY DECIDED TO OFFER HIM THE JOB? Explain that. This isn't that hard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.