JDBrocks Posted October 9, 2017 Share Posted October 9, 2017 I think the only point that was being made was that Treadwell is getting open. This was an example. Don't read into things. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SemperFeist Posted October 9, 2017 Share Posted October 9, 2017 1 hour ago, Purplexing said: Look back a few frames to see the ball about to be released. Look at the positions of the WR and CB THEN, not in the above frame when the ball was gone. Further, once the QB starts his motion, he can't change direction with his arm. If you think otherwise, go out on a field and try it. Bradford decided on Thielen BEFORE this frame. MMQBing for some unknown agenda - - - anti-Bradford? anti-Thielen? pro-Treadwell? Give it a rest. Your reading comprehension needs work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swede700 Posted October 9, 2017 Share Posted October 9, 2017 1 hour ago, Purplexing said: Now, the real reason I came here.... after the NYG lost 4 WRs to injury, at least one for the season, does Spielman make a call to the Giants GM about a trade of a WR? If so, who? That's an easy call...you offer them Wright. He offers the highest value for them and the most expendability for us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vikingsrule Posted October 9, 2017 Share Posted October 9, 2017 12 minutes ago, disaacs said: That's an easy call...you offer them Wright. He offers the highest value for them and the most expendability for us. Not sure, honestly Floyd might have more value than Wright. Floyd has served his suspension and is more the prototype for what they need to replace Beckham for the year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heimdallr Posted October 9, 2017 Share Posted October 9, 2017 Just now, vikingsrule said: Not sure, honestly Floyd might have more value than Wright. Floyd has served his suspension and is more the prototype for what they need to replace Beckham for the year. Would any team want to trade for Floyd without seeing him in action for at least a few games? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vikingsrule Posted October 9, 2017 Share Posted October 9, 2017 1 minute ago, Heimdallr said: Would any team want to trade for Floyd without seeing him in action for at least a few games? It will be interesting to see what his role will be and if the Vikes try and showcase him a bit for that reason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swede700 Posted October 9, 2017 Share Posted October 9, 2017 40 minutes ago, Heimdallr said: Would any team want to trade for Floyd without seeing him in action for at least a few games? Agreed, which is why I feel it's an easy call. There is really no tape on Floyd as of this season. Wright is going to have higher value at this point...and I think overall would have more value because he actually has a contract beyond this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vikingsrule Posted October 9, 2017 Share Posted October 9, 2017 9 minutes ago, disaacs said: Agreed, which is why I feel it's an easy call. There is really no tape on Floyd as of this season. Wright is going to have higher value at this point...and I think overall would have more value because he actually has a contract beyond this year. Might just come down to team need. In the case of the Giants, they have two injured boundary WRs and an injured slot WR. If I'm the Giants, I'd rather roll the dice with Floyd than Wright given the difference in skill set. Honestly I don't think NY makes a move anyway because this season is a lost cause at 0-5. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteelKing728 Posted October 9, 2017 Share Posted October 9, 2017 1 hour ago, disaacs said: That's an easy call...you offer them Wright. He offers the highest value for them and the most expendability for us. What if they offered a first, or a second for Treadwell? You take it? I don't believe this would happen, but just throwing a scenario out there for a desperate team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swede700 Posted October 9, 2017 Share Posted October 9, 2017 9 minutes ago, vikingsrule said: Might just come down to team need. In the case of the Giants, they have two injured boundary WRs and an injured slot WR. If I'm the Giants, I'd rather roll the dice with Floyd than Wright given the difference in skill set. Honestly I don't think NY makes a move anyway because this season is a lost cause at 0-5. I do agree...it's just for the sake of the argument, but I don't think they'll do anything. I certainly wouldn't. The season's already over for them, unless somehow they can miraculously run off 11 in a row. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SemperFeist Posted October 9, 2017 Share Posted October 9, 2017 2 hours ago, SteelKing728 said: What if they offered a first, or a second for Treadwell? You take it? I don't believe this would happen, but just throwing a scenario out there for a desperate team. Without hesitation. Treadwell, even if he continues to develop and progress, is likely to always be this team’s #3 receiver. Mid someone is offering you an 1st or 2nd round pick for your #3 receiver, you take it and run like Charlie Bucket. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klomp Posted October 9, 2017 Share Posted October 9, 2017 I probably would take that deal, but I'm probably one of the highest on Michael Floyd's impact and his security on the team,and that's a big reason you'd make a deal like that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klomp Posted October 9, 2017 Share Posted October 9, 2017 On 10/1/2017 at 6:12 PM, Klomp said: On 10/1/2017 at 6:10 PM, VikeManDan said: So Cook on IR opens spot for Floyd correct? Well sure, but unlikely they go forward with just two RBs and a FB.....possible, but not likely. Looks like the unlikely happened....Ridley (Cook's replacement on 53-man) released and Floyd activated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted October 9, 2017 Share Posted October 9, 2017 12 minutes ago, Klomp said: Looks like the unlikely happened....Ridley (Cook's replacement on 53-man) released and Floyd activated. Yeah...I don't really understand this move. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthCountryEvo Posted October 9, 2017 Share Posted October 9, 2017 16 minutes ago, Virginia Viking said: Yeah...I don't really understand this move. My assumption would be that they fee comfortable enough with Ham filling the RB3 role, and possibly using someone like Blake Bell or David Morgan in the H-back or fullback role if really needed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.