ny92mike Posted June 22, 2018 Share Posted June 22, 2018 2 hours ago, Whicker said: Good game, @ny92jefferis and @EaglesPeteC High scoring game. Defenses were on vacation this week. Last sims running back Murray showed me why we should have kept him. GG Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glen Posted June 22, 2018 Share Posted June 22, 2018 1 minute ago, Tk3 said: I mean.. it doesn't matter because inner division games net to .500 your team is .500 in non-division games, and our division is .625 like I said, it's all such a small sample size that is it pointless to discuss, but your argument is irrelevant. You are just .500 regardless of whether you count division games or not. I agree the argument doesn't matter with the sample size. But having more inner divisional games certainly matters considering your division will always be credited for a loss. Where in non inner divisional games there is the chance for two wins. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheKillerNacho Posted June 22, 2018 Author Share Posted June 22, 2018 1 hour ago, Tk3 said: crazy game for the Direwolves had a good lead, 1st and goal from the 2 in the 4th and we throw an INT. Bad algorithm. then BA gets a 4th down conversion, gets the TD, gets the onside kick, then elects not to kick a tying FG and instead runs the ball to end the game. Bad algorithm also. I'll take comfort knowing that the luck balanced out that game. You were up by 5 tho. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MookieMonstah Posted June 22, 2018 Share Posted June 22, 2018 41 minutes ago, El ramster said: You got wrecked mookie, Ggs baby love you bro. My secondary has been bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Ramster Posted June 22, 2018 Share Posted June 22, 2018 10 minutes ago, MookieMonster said: My secondary has been bad. Only passed for 220 it was good Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tk3 Posted June 22, 2018 Share Posted June 22, 2018 19 minutes ago, TheKillerNacho said: You were up by 5 tho. good catch I feel zero guilt about it then, since it wasn't a poor AI choice that sealed it. thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tk3 Posted June 22, 2018 Share Posted June 22, 2018 23 minutes ago, Gmen4ev said: I agree the argument doesn't matter with the sample size. But having more inner divisional games certainly matters considering your division will always be credited for a loss. Where in non inner divisional games there is the chance for two wins. There is a chance for 2 losses also though. The real way to test a division is to take the total record, then subtract out all divisional games. You're still .500 either way, although getting deeper in the season that is likely to change your argument might hold water if both divisions were 7-3 for example, but 2 of your losses were inner division. but the fact of the matter is, you are 2-2 inner division and 3-3 out of division, so there is no merit to the "inner division losses" argument at this point in the season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RuskieTitan Posted June 22, 2018 Share Posted June 22, 2018 2 hours ago, El ramster said: Aaron Donald [2 GS]: 14 tackles (2 stuffs), 5 sacks, 1 forced fumble.. Just real life Aaron Donald things. Your joy will turn into ashes. Weren’t you 4-0 last year? How long did you keep a 3-4 with Donald? We all said he'd best more in a 4-3. And yes. Yes I was. I'm not delusional about my start, I've been fortunate with turnovers by my defense but can't count on that forever, and my third down conversion rate on both sides is worrisome. Still, a win is a win and always helps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RuskieTitan Posted June 22, 2018 Share Posted June 22, 2018 I love how a casual offhand comment about an earlier argument this season has sparked more trash talk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glen Posted June 22, 2018 Share Posted June 22, 2018 49 minutes ago, Tk3 said: There is a chance for 2 losses also though. The real way to test a division is to take the total record, then subtract out all divisional games. You're still .500 either way, although getting deeper in the season that is likely to change your argument might hold water if both divisions were 7-3 for example, but 2 of your losses were inner division. but the fact of the matter is, you are 2-2 inner division and 3-3 out of division, so there is no merit to the "inner division losses" argument at this point in the season. But there is no chance for a guaranteed loss in the case of a inner divisional game Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glen Posted June 22, 2018 Share Posted June 22, 2018 3 minutes ago, RuskieTitan said: I love how a casual offhand comment about an earlier argument this season has sparked more trash talk. Dont @ me red scum Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EaglesPeteC Posted June 22, 2018 Share Posted June 22, 2018 1 hour ago, ny92jefferis said: High scoring game. Defenses were on vacation this week. Last sims running back Murray showed me why we should have kept him. GG Our run defense. Woof Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EaglesPeteC Posted June 22, 2018 Share Posted June 22, 2018 DJ Moore 5 rec 111 yard 3 TD's Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glen Posted June 22, 2018 Share Posted June 22, 2018 Let's say we've played 8 games 6 were out of division. Two were in division. We go 2-2 out and 2-2 in. Total of 4-4. .500 net win %. You on the other hand play 8 games. 7 were out of division. 1 was in. You go 4-2 out and 1-1 in. .625 net win %. You inherently have less guaranteed losses due to the fact that you technically cannot have a guaranteed loss while out of division. As opposed to the fact that you will 99% guaranteed have a loss in division. Now if lets say we moved one of our inner division games to make them an outer division game we take away a guaranteed loss and change that % to at least 50% either loss or win. There is a chance now that both divisions have a 4-2 record out of divison and now a 1-1 record in division. As opposed to the guaranteed 2-2 record we have and the guarenteed extra loss. This argument does not matter at all, this is a just a debate regarding statistics. Maybe we lose the out of division game and this debate is even more meaningless. But from a statistics stand point playing an extra game in division guarantees the net win % will hover closer to. 500. Where having less games in divisions gives the hypothetical chance of your divison hovering closer to .1000, or in turn .000 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glen Posted June 22, 2018 Share Posted June 22, 2018 Though debate aside. We can all take solace in the fact we(like 6 of us) were right about a certain thing. Which like always. Is true Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.