Jump to content

Please Stop the Jimmy Graham Disgruntlement Thread


MacReady

Recommended Posts

Just now, vegas492 said:

I can't argue that his contract is worth it.  It isn't.  I can't argue that he is an elite athlete.  He isn't. 

And that's the thing a lot of people can't get through their thick, cut-happy skulls. 

Nobody is arguing that Graham was worth the contract. 

The arguments here are as follows:

Jimmy Graham is better than people suggest.  He was literally a top 10 TE in receptions and yards. 
Jimmy Graham, given his contract, what else is available, should still be a Packer next season. 

It's literally that simple.  Nobody is saying he's this super duper elite TE.  He's still had a good season compared to other tight ends in the league in spite of being paid more than just having a good season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Outpost31 said:

And that's the thing a lot of people can't get through their thick, cut-happy skulls. 

Nobody is arguing that Graham was worth the contract. 

The arguments here are as follows:

Jimmy Graham is better than people suggest.  He was literally a top 10 TE in receptions and yards. 
Jimmy Graham, given his contract, what else is available, should still be a Packer next season. 

It's literally that simple.  Nobody is saying he's this super duper elite TE.  He's still had a good season compared to other tight ends in the league in spite of being paid more than just having a good season. 

I can see the other side, though, too.  That is an easy $5M to grab...in some people's minds. 

Now...if GB were up against the cap?  Then I"d listen more to that one.  But they aren't.  So that money doesn't mean anything to me.  I think we all know that you aren't replacing Graham's production for $5M.  So...you are caught between the rock and the hard place.  Only this place isn't all that hard.  You just shrug your shoulders, give him another year and not compound the mistake.  Along the way, you develop your next tight end.  Be it Tonyan or draft pick....or both.

Let me ask you this....do you see Graham getting that final year of his deal?  I don't, because that is when you can release and not make the mistake worse. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Outpost31 said:

And that's the thing a lot of people can't get through their thick, cut-happy skulls. 

Nobody is arguing that Graham was worth the contract. 

The arguments here are as follows:

Jimmy Graham is better than people suggest.  He was literally a top 10 TE in receptions and yards. 
Jimmy Graham, given his contract, what else is available, should still be a Packer next season. 

It's literally that simple.  Nobody is saying he's this super duper elite TE.  He's still had a good season compared to other tight ends in the league in spite of being paid more than just having a good season. 

I can buy that logic. 

You could have fooled me, however; that convo was solely about whether to keep him going forward or not.  I lose track of who said what and when.  Title of thread isn't keep him or cut him.  Its a discussion of signing and player, yeah? 

So in hindsight are you saying bad signing? It seems you are saying that when you say he wasn't worth the contract.  Or is the hedge or position that it was good/decent signing because you have to overpay free agents and you got top 10 production? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, dll2000 said:

So in hindsight are you saying bad signing? It seems you are saying that when you say he wasn't worth the contract.  Or is the hedge or position that it was good/decent signing because you have to overpay free agents and you got top 10 production? 

No.  He wasn't a bad signing.  You HAVE to overpay in free agency in order to get players.  Especially as early as we signed Graham.  The signing was not a bad signing.  He's not worth the contract.  Signing not bad signing, not worth contract.  Not bad signing, not worth contract. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, vegas492 said:

I can see the other side, though, too.  That is an easy $5M to grab...in some people's minds. 

Now...if GB were up against the cap?  Then I"d listen more to that one.  But they aren't.  So that money doesn't mean anything to me.  I think we all know that you aren't replacing Graham's production for $5M.  So...you are caught between the rock and the hard place.  Only this place isn't all that hard.  You just shrug your shoulders, give him another year and not compound the mistake.  Along the way, you develop your next tight end.  Be it Tonyan or draft pick....or both.

Right; I said above that it's opportunity cost - is Graham's contract going to keep GB from going out and getting other quality FAs? No. And barring some shocking release, I doubt there's going to any TEs better than he is out there anyway. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/31/2018 at 10:32 AM, vegas492 said:

Going to put this into some perspective.....  Keep in mind that from day one I thought that we overpaid for Graham.  But...releasing him now only compounds that mistake.

Jimmy Graham contract, 3 years, $30M.  11M guaranteed.

His salary cap number for 2018 was 5.9M. 

If you release him this year, that will be one year at $13.2M.

If you play him through next year, that is two years at $18.5M.  

Look, I'm not arguing that Graham is worth the contract, I am saying that by releasing him, you make the mistake that much larger.  The best course of action is to play him for one more year and then make the decision.  

 

I agree . The mistake was already made and unfortunately it was the sort of mistake that was a 2 year one. He could have been a Richard Rodgers caliber of TE this year and he wouldn’t be going anywhere. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Jimmy Graham had top 10 stats with that chitty of a year then imagine what he could do in a good year. He seemed to leave a lot on the field, had some bad drops(the got worse after the thumb injury) and he also was an abysmal blocker for the most part. 

Here's to hoping he gets his head out of his *** and the new coach gets him involved more surrounding his strengths. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ReadyToThump said:

If Jimmy Graham had top 10 stats with that chitty of a year then imagine what he could do in a good year. He seemed to leave a lot on the field, had some bad drops(the got worse after the thumb injury) and he also was an abysmal blocker for the most part. 

Here's to hoping he gets his head out of his *** and the new coach gets him involved more surrounding his strengths. 

Plausible if he were 26. Bounce backs at 32 are few and far between. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, cannondale said:

Plausible if he were 26. Bounce backs at 32 are few and far between. 

His chances of bouncing back are not very good.  Gute dumped Nelson, so he probably should seriously consider dumping Graham now as well.  Tom Silverstein has been talking like it's a forgone conclusion that Graham will be dumped.  I guess there is a 5 million dollar signing bonus in March .. he sees no way the Packers pay that.  I think Silverstein left open the possibility of a restructure, but saw no way he'd be back under his current deal.  We shall see. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ReadyToThump said:

If Jimmy Graham had top 10 stats with that chitty of a year then imagine what he could do in a good year. He seemed to leave a lot on the field, had some bad drops(the got worse after the thumb injury) and he also was an abysmal blocker for the most part. 

Here's to hoping he gets his head out of his *** and the new coach gets him involved more surrounding his strengths. 

 

1 hour ago, cannondale said:

Plausible if he were 26. Bounce backs at 32 are few and far between. 

He doesn't really need a "bounce back", though.  What he needs are a couple TD's and another 10 catches or so next year to have a great year at TE.  To me, that seems very possible given another year in the system and another year with Rodgers.  And...as pointed out...if you want more production...throw him the ball more.  There's plenty of film out there that shows him open and not getting the ball.  

I was really, really disappointed in his red zone production/effort.  Those 1:1 balls should have been easy for him.  Rodgers tried the jump ball, didn't work.  Tried the box out, lower balls, and they didn't work.  It was maddening.  

It would also be maddening to have paid him about 13M for this one season if he is cut now.  If Gute can restructure?  Man, that would be great and I hadn't thought of that and how it could work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




×
×
  • Create New...