EaglesPeteC Posted June 9, 2019 Share Posted June 9, 2019 Just now, Jeezla said: Who gets benched first? Eli or Keenum? Dak Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeezla Posted June 9, 2019 Share Posted June 9, 2019 1 minute ago, EaglesPeteC said: Dak I can't even name their backup. No idea who it is. Their OC? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EaglesPeteC Posted June 9, 2019 Share Posted June 9, 2019 1 hour ago, Jeezla said: I can't even name their backup. No idea who it is. Their OC? Jason Garret will strap them up himself Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nabbs4u Posted June 10, 2019 Share Posted June 10, 2019 1 hour ago, Jeezla said: Who gets benched first? Eli or Keenum? Keenum. More pressure in DC if they start slow and with Daniel Snyder. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nlesthought Posted June 10, 2019 Share Posted June 10, 2019 Easily keenum he might not make it out TC as the starter. They will at least let Eli go full derp before considering DJ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matts4313 Posted June 10, 2019 Share Posted June 10, 2019 15 hours ago, Art_Vandalay said: I think it's time for "LT is overrated because he might get injured" to pass the torch to "The running game doesn't matter" Show me an ounce of proof that it does. Measurable. Show measurable proof. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matts4313 Posted June 10, 2019 Share Posted June 10, 2019 15 hours ago, Jeezla said: 15 hours ago, EaglesPeteC said: Dak I can't even name their backup. No idea who it is. Their OC? thats insulting. He is the best ginger in the NFL. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Art_Vandalay Posted June 10, 2019 Share Posted June 10, 2019 1 hour ago, Matts4313 said: Show me an ounce of proof that it does. Measurable. Show measurable proof. You're the Dwight of FF. I applaud your commitment though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nabbs4u Posted June 10, 2019 Share Posted June 10, 2019 6 hours ago, Art_Vandalay said: You're the Dwight of FF. I applaud your commitment though. Hey less quoting of Dwight. It's quieter that way. At least for me.🍺 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matts4313 Posted June 11, 2019 Share Posted June 11, 2019 21 hours ago, Art_Vandalay said: You're the Dwight of FF. I applaud your commitment though. You dont find it interesting that there is literally 0 statistical connection between any rushing stat and winning? Its literally like 40% of what happens in a sport we love..... and there is no measurable way to show it helps you win. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jroc04 Posted June 11, 2019 Share Posted June 11, 2019 1 hour ago, Matts4313 said: You dont find it interesting that there is literally 0 statistical connection between any rushing stat and winning? Its literally like 40% of what happens in a sport we love..... and there is no measurable way to show it helps you win. I gotta imagine if your team out rushes the opponent, you’d win most of the time, no? I don’t think there’s much correlation to winning in bulk stats. I’ve said this for a while though. I think you’ll see a lot of Super Bowl teams supported with a top 10ish run game but to say the top rushing teams from year to year are always in the championship is probably unfounded. But on a micro level, I’d venture a guess that the team that wins the rushing battle game to game is most likely to win. Or at least like 70% of the time. Interesting though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danger Posted June 11, 2019 Share Posted June 11, 2019 (edited) So I took the winning percentage of all teams in the league last year, their Rushing Yards per game, and their cumulative passer rating. As you can see, both show a notable correlation. But the correlation factor, the first value in the binomial equation, (the one with the x) is in fact stronger in terms of rushing yards per game, than is it on the passer rating one. Now, now, now. Taking into account that Passer Rating typically has less variation in sheer number alone. The variance in Rushing YPG vs Winning percentage is 0.55 (=49.6/89.4), where the Passer Rating is 0.63 (=44.8/70.4). Meaning that an improvement in passer rating is in fact more likely to lead to more wins than an improvement in rushing yardage. However the discrepancy Matts wants to make of rushing not correlating with winning, is silly. Edited June 11, 2019 by Danger 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matts4313 Posted June 11, 2019 Share Posted June 11, 2019 18 minutes ago, Danger said: However the discrepancy Matts wants to make of rushing not correlating with winning, is silly. I knew there was a reason I always respected you. Damn man. Brilliant. One thing though, its ANY/A. Well, actually, ANY/A over opponent. Its literally the only highly correlated/predictive stat in football. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danger Posted June 11, 2019 Share Posted June 11, 2019 8 minutes ago, Matts4313 said: I knew there was a reason I always respected you. Damn man. Brilliant. One thing though, its ANY/A. Well, actually, ANY/A over opponent. Its literally the only highly correlated/predictive stat in football. I will look more into that later tonight. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ninjapirate Posted June 12, 2019 Share Posted June 12, 2019 On 6/7/2019 at 6:44 PM, Jroc04 said: funny to me that a guy with zero sacks against lane johnson in his career thinks he is in any positions to criticize the eagles. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.