TheBitzMan Posted October 28, 2019 Share Posted October 28, 2019 3 minutes ago, CWood21 said: I don't think I'd even give up that. His production has been mediocre this year. Mediocre is actually quite generous. He has 13 catches for 176 yards... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
packfanfb Posted October 28, 2019 Share Posted October 28, 2019 Just now, Norm said: Just because we paid a crappy tight end doesn't mean we don't need one honestly I just don't think it's a position where you usually get the production for that kind of money...outside of many the top 3-4 guys in the league. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norm Posted October 28, 2019 Share Posted October 28, 2019 1 minute ago, TheBitzMan said: Mediocre is actually quite generous. He has 13 catches for 176 yards... Arians doesn't do tight ends any favors but I'm sure Brate has better stats so it makes me look wrong there 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norm Posted October 28, 2019 Share Posted October 28, 2019 Just now, packfanfb said: I just don't think it's a position where you usually get the production for that kind of money...outside of many the top 3-4 guys in the league. That seems fair. I thought it was based off just Jimmy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
packfanfb Posted October 28, 2019 Share Posted October 28, 2019 Just now, Norm said: Arians doesn't do tight ends any favors but I'm sure Brate has better stats so it makes me look wrong there Brate would actually the be the TE at Tampa that would interest me the most. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norm Posted October 28, 2019 Share Posted October 28, 2019 Just now, packfanfb said: Brate would actually the be the TE at Tampa that would interest me the most. I've always liked him too Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
packfanfb Posted October 28, 2019 Share Posted October 28, 2019 Hopefully Sternberger can hit and at least be a decent starter or even role TE. Otherwise, our 3-year run on 3rd round picks will be Burks, M. Adams and Sternberger. So far, we're batting about .100 in the series. Need Sternberger to bring up that average. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
{Family Ghost} Posted October 28, 2019 Share Posted October 28, 2019 8 minutes ago, CWood21 said: I don't think I'd even give up that. His production has been mediocre this year. Yeah .. a 2nd and 4th might be a bit rich. I think part of the problem this year is scheme, but Howard hasn't exactly lit the league on fire. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cannondale Posted October 28, 2019 Share Posted October 28, 2019 (edited) 27 27 34 23 42 31 We will be adding a #1 WR soon (for free). It's the other side of the ball that's trending the wrong way Edited October 28, 2019 by cannondale Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
{Family Ghost} Posted October 28, 2019 Share Posted October 28, 2019 Rob Demovsky✔@RobDemovsky When asked if he will poke his head into GM Brian Gutekunst's office a little more than usual in the next 24 hours before the trade dealine, coach Matt LaFleur said with a big smile: "Probably." https://es.pn/336pqBe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packerraymond Posted October 28, 2019 Author Share Posted October 28, 2019 1 minute ago, {Family Ghost} said: Rob Demovsky✔@RobDemovsky When asked if he will poke his head into GM Brian Gutekunst's office a little more than usual in the next 24 hours before the trade dealine, coach Matt LaFleur said with a big smile: "Probably." https://es.pn/336pqBe All gas, no ***** brake. Applied to you too Gutey. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coachbuns Posted October 28, 2019 Share Posted October 28, 2019 5 hours ago, packfanfb said: I think 4 or 5. Had a pretty solid year in 2017 with Washington with Cousins throwing the rock and got a pretty decent contract offer from the Ravens the following off-season but it was voided due to a failed physical. The guy can play, especially in the role we need. Then get him activated and see what he can do. Cant be any worse than Sheppard. They finally gave zlezard a chance and he's been a pleasant surprise. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
incognito_man Posted October 28, 2019 Share Posted October 28, 2019 Wolfe is still my top target for an in-season trade. Is Carlos Dunlap on the block Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uffdaswede Posted October 28, 2019 Share Posted October 28, 2019 (edited) 10 minutes ago, coachbuns said: Then get him activated and see what he can do. Cant be any worse than Sheppard. They finally gave zlezard a chance and he's been a pleasant surprise. I like the way that Lazard seeks out contact. He's like a Hanson out there. Lazard the Hazard. Edit: It's weird the way I come back every ten minutes hoping to find an 8 page thread with a title similar to "Packers trade for _____________ !" It's as stupid as standing in the driveway waiting for the UPS truck when I haven't actually ordered anything. Edited October 28, 2019 by Uffdaswede Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fl0nkerton Posted October 28, 2019 Share Posted October 28, 2019 (edited) 8 minutes ago, incognito_man said: Wolfe is still my top target for an in-season trade. Is Carlos Dunlap on the block Apparently the Bengals are being stubborn and are content with not trading anybody. Teams have called about Atkins, Dunlop, Green and they hang up. Quote The Bengals could get a first-round pick for injured receiver A.J. Green -- an unrestricted free agent at season's end who won't be back there -- but owner Mike Brown refuses to entertain the idea, sources said. The Bengals were also getting repeated calls about Geno Atkins, Carlos Dunlap, Tyler Eifert and Drew Kirkpatrick, sources said, but at this point some general managers aren't even sure if they're going to check back in next week given the way the Bengals have responded to this point. "They are basically philosophically opposed to the idea of making trades," said one NFC GM. "It's a waste of time to call them. But we did. And it is what it is. You may as well be speaking a different language." https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/nfl-trade-deadline-bengals-redskins-frustrating-other-teams-with-stubborn-no-sell-stance/ Edited October 28, 2019 by Fl0nkerton Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.