plan9misfit Posted March 26, 2021 Share Posted March 26, 2021 52 minutes ago, SweetFancyMoses said: I think I asked this already, but I'm getting old. If both Chase and Pitts are there, you still taking Pitts? Yes, because I have Pitts as the higher rated player, and because he'd open up more opportunities for the other WRs on the team due to the mismatches that he creates against LBs and Safeties. And this is coming from someone who loves Ja'Marr Chase. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
plan9misfit Posted March 26, 2021 Share Posted March 26, 2021 52 minutes ago, SweetFancyMoses said: Afraid he will 'Kwity' on the team? I never understood why people were mocking him top 15 for a good run DE with the potential for pass rush. He won't quit on the team. He's just a guy with incredible athleticism, but zero on-field production. If you told me he projects to be a 4th round rotational guy, then I'd be on board. But a 1st rounder? Feh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
plan9misfit Posted March 26, 2021 Share Posted March 26, 2021 25 minutes ago, WizardHawk said: Fair or not, I see Kwity Paye and my brain immediately says, no thanks. There’s Taco Charlton again. And, Taco was far more productive at Michigan than Paye was. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matt79511 Posted March 26, 2021 Share Posted March 26, 2021 58 minutes ago, SweetFancyMoses said: Afraid he will 'Kwity' on the team? I never understood why people were mocking him top 15 for a good run DE with the potential for pass rush. Lol yes that was the pun I was going for But really I saw him being mocked to us in late November/early December (back when were projected to land the 4th overall pick) and the description of the pick basically called him a 3-4 DE. I immediately thought “yeah, that’s definitely not happening.” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SweetFancyMoses Posted March 26, 2021 Share Posted March 26, 2021 2 hours ago, plan9misfit said: Yes, because I have Pitts as the higher rated player, and because he'd open up more opportunities for the other WRs on the team due to the mismatches that he creates against LBs and Safeties. And this is coming from someone who loves Ja'Marr Chase. I have come around on taking Pitts over Chase. It's mainly because there are so many 3rd and 4th rd wr options. We can grab a slot guy like Eskrich or Dyami Brown, and move Cee Dee outside after Gallup leaves. Plus I'd love if we can run and pass out of the same formation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Northland Posted March 26, 2021 Share Posted March 26, 2021 Kwity Paye scares the you know what out of me. I just get the sense it would be Taco 2.0 with him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
plan9misfit Posted March 26, 2021 Share Posted March 26, 2021 Ran a new mock with the new draft order. There's no way it shakes out like this.10. Kyle Pitts TE, Florida44. Christian Barmore IDL, Alabama75. Tyson Campbell CB, Georgia99. Ar'Darius Washington S, TCU115. Tyler Shelvin IDL, LSU138. Adetokunbo Ogundeji EDGE, Notre Dame179. Anthony Schwartz WR, Auburn192. Jack Anderson IOL, Texas Tech227. Marco Wilson CB, Florida238. Royce Newman OT, Ole Miss Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quiller Posted March 27, 2021 Share Posted March 27, 2021 6 hours ago, plan9misfit said: Ran a new mock with the new draft order. There's no way it shakes out like this.10. Kyle Pitts TE, Florida44. Christian Barmore IDL, Alabama75. Tyson Campbell CB, Georgia99. Ar'Darius Washington S, TCU115. Tyler Shelvin IDL, LSU138. Adetokunbo Ogundeji EDGE, Notre Dame179. Anthony Schwartz WR, Auburn192. Jack Anderson IOL, Texas Tech227. Marco Wilson CB, Florida238. Royce Newman OT, Ole Miss If you could guarantee those first 4 to 5 picks then I wouldn’t be so down on Pitts at 10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nextyearfordaboyz Posted March 27, 2021 Share Posted March 27, 2021 I’m really curious what Dallas is thinking about DT. Broaddus was saying that he’s heard from people around the league that Brent Urban was a home run signing. And reading reports from a lot of different people, he seems like a really good run defender. I kind of wonder if Dallas feels ok at the position, with a Gallimore/Hill rotation at 3T and Urban/Woods at 1T. Obviously that’s not an elite group, but you can go out and play with them. If they draft someone, they might be more interested in the guys who can do a little of both. Marlon Tuipulotu, Alim McNeill, Marvin Wilson could all make some sense starting in round 3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SweetFancyMoses Posted March 27, 2021 Share Posted March 27, 2021 6 hours ago, Nextyearfordaboyz said: I’m really curious what Dallas is thinking about DT. Broaddus was saying that he’s heard from people around the league that Brent Urban was a home run signing. And reading reports from a lot of different people, he seems like a really good run defender. I kind of wonder if Dallas feels ok at the position, with a Gallimore/Hill rotation at 3T and Urban/Woods at 1T. Obviously that’s not an elite group, but you can go out and play with them. If they draft someone, they might be more interested in the guys who can do a little of both. Marlon Tuipulotu, Alim McNeill, Marvin Wilson could all make some sense starting in round 3. Even if Urban was a great signing, we only signed him for a year. Love to get Shelvin/Wilson at 99 to rotate and develop. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nextyearfordaboyz Posted March 27, 2021 Share Posted March 27, 2021 PFF discussed which positions groups are the strongest in the draft: https://www.pff.com/news/draft-2021-nfl-draft-best-position-groups If you are trying to read tea leaves, this might be why we went (relatively) hard after DT and Safety in FA. I wouldn’t bank on anything before #99 at those positions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texas_OutLaw7 Posted March 27, 2021 Author Share Posted March 27, 2021 19 minutes ago, Nextyearfordaboyz said: PFF discussed which positions groups are the strongest in the draft: https://www.pff.com/news/draft-2021-nfl-draft-best-position-groups If you are trying to read tea leaves, this might be why we went (relatively) hard after DT and Safety in FA. I wouldn’t bank on anything before #99 at those positions. I wouldn't hate on punting on FS this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texas_OutLaw7 Posted March 27, 2021 Author Share Posted March 27, 2021 You know. That eagles trade is so benificial. It gives us a much better chance of Pitts falling. 1. Pitts 2. Sewell 3. Slater 4. Surtain 5. Horn 6. Waddle I can see a world where 4 of them are available. And. If that's the case. I'd almost want to see what NE can offer for the last first round QB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nextyearfordaboyz Posted March 27, 2021 Share Posted March 27, 2021 46 minutes ago, Texas_OutLaw7 said: You know. That eagles trade is so benificial. It gives us a much better chance of Pitts falling. 1. Pitts 2. Sewell 3. Slater 4. Surtain 5. Horn 6. Waddle I can see a world where 4 of them are available. And. If that's the case. I'd almost want to see what NE can offer for the last first round QB. We’ve talked a lot about the CBs you can get in round 2, but the offensive linemen at #44 might even be better. That moves Slater down for me a bit. My wish list right now is the same group of players, but different order: Sewell-Pitts-Surtain-Waddle-Slater-Horn (though ask me tomorrow and I might swap Waddle ahead of Surtain). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texas_OutLaw7 Posted March 27, 2021 Author Share Posted March 27, 2021 4 minutes ago, Nextyearfordaboyz said: We’ve talked a lot about the CBs you can get in round 2, but the offensive linemen at #44 might even be better. That moves Slater down for me a bit. My wish list right now is the same group of players, but different order: Sewell-Pitts-Surtain-Waddle-Slater-Horn (though ask me tomorrow and I might swap Waddle ahead of Surtain). Let me ask this...if we picked 6th overall. Would that change you list at all? I think that would move CBs lower and I'd almost certainly want a trade down. In the event I didn't get a trade down I think I'd be just pitts and sewell or bust. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts