Jump to content

Is there a big debate about the best team in your franchises history?


CP3MVP

Recommended Posts

50 minutes ago, CP3MVP said:

Like among the fanbase?

For example among pats fans it’s 2007 versus 2004. The 04 team was one of the most complete teams ever and the won the ring but the 2007 team is the 2007 team. 

I will forever say the 2007 Pats team was the GOAT. Not that it's that bold, but that team was utterly ridiculous. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, bigbadbuff said:

I will forever say the 2007 Pats team was the GOAT. Not that it's that bold, but that team was utterly ridiculous. 

A team that didn't win a ring can't be the greatest in your history lmao what.

For the Colts there is always a debate about whether the 2005 or 2007 team was the best, which is ironic given that both of these teams got bounced in the divisional while the 2006 team in between won the Super Bowl with the worst run defence in NFL history.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, rich homie said:

A team that didn't win a ring can't be the greatest in your history lmao what.

For the Colts there is always a debate about whether the 2005 or 2007 team was the best, which is ironic given that both of these teams got bounced in the divisional while the 2006 team in between won the Super Bowl with the worst run defence in NFL history.

Yes they can, because that 2007 Pats team wins the super bowl 99% of the time IMO. Not all champions are created equal. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Matts4313 said:

A tiny one. 92, 93 or 95 (superbowl years).

Most lean 95 due to Deion. But according to the metrics the 92 team is like the 4th greatest team in NFL history. I think the Redskins have #1.

Those 90s Dallas teams don't even crack the top 20 in DVOA, but 92 Dallas is above 95 Dallas as you point out. 93 team is a distant 3rd.

https://www.footballoutsiders.com/dvoa-ratings/2020/historical-dvoa-estimates-revisited.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, rich homie said:

Okay but they didn't.

I have no exception with that being the best Pats team, but its certainly not the *greatest*.

...is “greatest” not a synonym of “best?”

The 07 Pats are not the most accomplished team, but they are the greatest. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, QBIso said:

...is “greatest” not a synonym of “best?”

The 07 Pats are not the most accomplished team, but they are the greatest. 

No they're two related but very distinct things. 'Greatest' is a measure of greatness, which is a matter of legacy and accomplishments, as opposed to 'best' which would simply describe quality.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, incognito_man said:

Those 90s Dallas teams don't even crack the top 20 in DVOA, but 92 Dallas is above 95 Dallas as you point out. 93 team is a distant 3rd.

https://www.footballoutsiders.com/dvoa-ratings/2020/historical-dvoa-estimates-revisited.

Interesting. I swear I read a list that based on metrics the 92 team was top 5. Guess I was wrong. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...