TecmoSuperJoe Posted November 16, 2021 Share Posted November 16, 2021 Hey 1/2 chokeholds called ain't so bad! 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jakuvious Posted November 16, 2021 Share Posted November 16, 2021 That's a very doable schedule for San Fran. And that #7 seed is not tough right now in the NFC. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrry32 Posted November 16, 2021 Share Posted November 16, 2021 1 minute ago, Jakuvious said: Seriously, get Stafford out of there. Force him to play as punishment. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dome Posted November 16, 2021 Share Posted November 16, 2021 1 minute ago, squire12 said: tough on the OL when there is no need to respect the run.  also tough on the OL when there is no need to respect the OL 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nabbs4u Posted November 16, 2021 Share Posted November 16, 2021 3 minutes ago, Malfatron said: Ransey was the only brightish spot for the rams this game tbh No doubt but he would of been better served following Deebo all night instead of SF #2,3 and 4 WR's. Maybe the Rams DC is the idiot who made that call, God knows as a Eagles fan we know what incompetence at DC looks like. I Just believe there's a specific reason behind that decision, that's all. Deebo is a beast, not the typical #1 WR he'd follow IMO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forge Posted November 16, 2021 Share Posted November 16, 2021 1 minute ago, Jakuvious said: That's a very doable schedule for San Fran. And that #7 seed is not tough right now in the NFC. We could definitely sneak in as a 6 or 7 seed in the NFC. Not inspiring, but definitely something. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squire12 Posted November 16, 2021 Share Posted November 16, 2021 1 minute ago, Dome said: also tough on the OL when there is no need to respect the OL true Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malfatron Posted November 16, 2021 Author Share Posted November 16, 2021 Just now, Nabbs4u said: No doubt but he would of been better served following Deebo all night instead of SF #2,3 and 4 WR's. Maybe the Rams DC is the idiot who made that call, God knows as a Eagles fan we know what incompetence at DC looks like. I Just believe there's a specific reason behind that decision, that's all. Deebo is a beast, not the typical #1 WR he'd follow IMO. i mean, the way the rams defense called the game, this isnt the primary concern Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manny/Patrick Posted November 16, 2021 Share Posted November 16, 2021 If we lose to JAX this W means nothing Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TecmoSuperJoe Posted November 16, 2021 Share Posted November 16, 2021 "SAME OLD RAMS". I'd post the video, but you know...Dana Stubblefield's legacy pass has been removed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TecmoSuperJoe Posted November 16, 2021 Share Posted November 16, 2021 Just now, Manny/Patrick said: If we lose to JAX this W means nothing Unless...the 49ers win the remaining games after that!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JAF-N72EX Posted November 16, 2021 Share Posted November 16, 2021 2 minutes ago, Nabbs4u said: No doubt but he would of been better served following Deebo all night instead of SF #2,3 and 4 WR's. That's not how alot of defenses are designed anymore. Alot of defenses (if not most) keep their CBs on the same side regardless of opponent. Offenses have become too creative and versatile to just expect a Sanders-like-CB to shadow a Moss-like-WR on every play. Especially in todays game with the rules favored for the offense and DPI being called on damn near every wrong look. It happens at times, but it's not common. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nabbs4u Posted November 16, 2021 Share Posted November 16, 2021 1 minute ago, Malfatron said: i mean, the way the rams defense called the game, this isnt the primary concern Disagree. You put Ramsey on Deebo regardless of outcome, maybe as a Defense you could commit more players to stopping the run? At worst, limit Deebo from going for 150 and 2 Tuddies. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TecmoSuperJoe Posted November 16, 2021 Share Posted November 16, 2021 LMAO Rams bench already tuning OBJ out? 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malfatron Posted November 16, 2021 Author Share Posted November 16, 2021 Just now, Nabbs4u said: Disagree. You put Ramsey on Deebo regardless of outcome, maybe as a Defense you could commit more players to stopping the run? At worst, limit Deebo from going for 150 and 2 Tuddies. then someone else racks up the yards Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
(27).thumb.jpeg.d38ef0ab4b642a52717d4481181ff8bd.jpeg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.