Daniel Posted March 15, 2022 Share Posted March 15, 2022 Titans are chasing a window, so they aren't using a first on a QB. Especially not the only top QB they haven't even met with. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE DUKE Posted March 15, 2022 Share Posted March 15, 2022 I think OT will be rd 1, rd 2 or not at all for the Bengals. They have young guys in D'Ante Smith and Fred Johnson, and I expect them to sign a starter. If a guy they love early is there, then they probably cut bait with Fred Johnson. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Suffering_Bills Posted March 15, 2022 Author Share Posted March 15, 2022 10 minutes ago, Daniel said: Titans are chasing a window, so they aren't using a first on a QB. Especially not the only top QB they haven't even met with. Fair point. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Suffering_Bills Posted March 15, 2022 Author Share Posted March 15, 2022 1 minute ago, THE DUKE said: I think OT will be rd 1, rd 2 or not at all for the Bengals. They have young guys in D'Ante Smith and Fred Johnson, and I expect them to sign a starter. If a guy they love early is there, then they probably cut bait with Fred Johnson. We'll see. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel Posted March 15, 2022 Share Posted March 15, 2022 5 minutes ago, Suffering_Bills said: Fair point. WR, OG, and TE are still big needs though. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scar988 Posted March 15, 2022 Share Posted March 15, 2022 If the Falcons go Jordan Davis, they don't need Phil Mathis too. Go EDGE with either one of those spots and then stick with the DT for that other spot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Suffering_Bills Posted March 15, 2022 Author Share Posted March 15, 2022 9 minutes ago, scar988 said: If the Falcons go Jordan Davis, they don't need Phil Mathis too. Go EDGE with either one of those spots and then stick with the DT for that other spot. Quality depth is never a bad thing, my friend. Without it, you're putting all your eggs in one basket. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scar988 Posted March 15, 2022 Share Posted March 15, 2022 8 minutes ago, Suffering_Bills said: Quality depth is never a bad thing, my friend. Without it, you're putting all your eggs in one basket. The Falcons have depth at IDL though with Davidson, Graham, and Rush. No need for another DT in this draft when they only keep 5 active on game days. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Suffering_Bills Posted March 15, 2022 Author Share Posted March 15, 2022 Just now, scar988 said: The Falcons have depth at IDL though with Davidson, Graham, and Rush. No need for another DT in this draft when they only keep 5 active on game days. K. Give me an alternative pick based on my mock scenario. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scar988 Posted March 15, 2022 Share Posted March 15, 2022 At 74 go Quay Walker. Walker would be Foye's replacement. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Suffering_Bills Posted March 15, 2022 Author Share Posted March 15, 2022 7 minutes ago, scar988 said: At 74 go Quay Walker. Walker would be Foye's replacement. Done Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FalconFan13 Posted March 16, 2022 Share Posted March 16, 2022 8 hours ago, scar988 said: At 74 go Quay Walker. Walker would be Foye's replacement. Good decision my guy Quay is a nice player and solid pickup. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappaz Posted March 19, 2022 Share Posted March 19, 2022 Would doubt Chargers go LB in the 1st, can't imagine they've given up on Murray yet after just 2 seasons even though he did look pretty bad last year. Really think WR is likely, someone with some field stretching speed and yac abilities. Williams would be good there and gives Herbert someone who can take it to the house at any moment. Other needs would be the right side of the line but not sure anyone is available at 17 who would be worth it. They might consider another corner as well especially considering the air attack in the AFCW. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
43M Posted March 19, 2022 Share Posted March 19, 2022 Really doubtful we go OLine early in this draft. Not that its not still a need, but I know how the Steelers think when it comes to OLine, and IMO, they feel like their Oline is set for 2022. A franchise LT is the only thing I could see them potentially drafting. I guarantee they wont be taking Linderbaum, though. Some combination of WR, DL and DB will likely be the first 2 or 3 picks. OT and LB are lesser possibilities. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Suffering_Bills Posted March 30, 2022 Author Share Posted March 30, 2022 On 3/19/2022 at 7:44 AM, 43M said: Really doubtful we go OLine early in this draft. Not that its not still a need, but I know how the Steelers think when it comes to OLine, and IMO, they feel like their Oline is set for 2022. A franchise LT is the only thing I could see them potentially drafting. I guarantee they wont be taking Linderbaum, though. Some combination of WR, DL and DB will likely be the first 2 or 3 picks. OT and LB are lesser possibilities. Changed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.