the lone star Posted March 29, 2022 Share Posted March 29, 2022 Is Tyler Biadasz The Answer At Center? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texas_OutLaw7 Posted March 29, 2022 Share Posted March 29, 2022 Maybe. I don't think he is awful. I also don't think he is FredBeard. If the LG spot is fixed we can roll with him. I'd just like him to hit the weight room. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D82 Posted March 29, 2022 Share Posted March 29, 2022 I think so. Though if Linderbaum is there, you take him and don't think twice about it. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WizardHawk Posted March 29, 2022 Share Posted March 29, 2022 (edited) I don’t think he’s ever going to be on Frederick’s level. He probably fits somewhere between above average and good. Could use an increase his strength. That said, it wouldn’t stop me from drafting Linderbaum if the cards fell right and I don’t mean at pick 24. Edited March 29, 2022 by WizardHawk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaBoys Posted March 29, 2022 Share Posted March 29, 2022 If by “the answer” you mean he’s going to be our Center for the next 10 years and achieve multiple pro bowls …then my answer is no. He isn’t exactly a weakness but he is highly replaceable imo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
textaz03 Posted March 30, 2022 Share Posted March 30, 2022 I think he is going to have to be for the near term. Long term? I don’t think so. he is an average Center who can hold his own, but can not help make up for deficiencies next to him like Fred Beard could. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matt79511 Posted March 30, 2022 Share Posted March 30, 2022 (edited) So these things aren't always a matter of a player being "the answer" for a decade-plus as much as making do with what you've got. Of the non-Tyron/Martin projected OL starters, you've got 2 guys in Biasdaz and Steele who've started 20+ games for Dallas in just two years, yielding mixed results but with an upward trajectory. Then you've got McGovern, who's started 14 in three years (not sure how many of these are even at guard vs. FB?) and completely blew his chance to become full-time LG last year. Even if McGovern's status as a third rounder makes you want to give him some sort of incumbency, to not just write off his spot to a rookie... the problem is that he's going into his contract year, where Steele and Biasdaz are both under team control for at least 2 more seasons. So we'll reassess Steele and Biasdaz's spots (and Tyron's, perhaps) in a year's time. IMO, this team just has too many holes to seriously look into replacing Biasdaz this offseason. He's fine, maybe even pretty good. A swing tackle to push Josh Ball and just provide more insurance there is a bigger concern, IMO, as well as LG obviously. Edited March 30, 2022 by matt79511 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nextyearfordaboyz Posted March 30, 2022 Share Posted March 30, 2022 Give me your criteria for what you mean by “the answer”. Do I think he’s our starter for the next 2 seasons? Yes, and that doesn’t stress me out to much. Do I think he’ll take the next step and become a Pro Bowler worth extending? Maybe not. But I do think there is potential if he improves his functional strength. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CAPJ Posted March 30, 2022 Share Posted March 30, 2022 I don't have much inside into him as a prospect so I'll take everyone's word for it. If we take a center in Rd 1 and he isn't a pro bowl caliber player, I rather draft a different position. I get hard to qualify who willl be a pro bowl player at pick 24 but centers don't typically go that high unless really high upside. Doesnt need to be Fredbeard but if the thinking is he is replaceable or an average starter for 2 years, spend the pick elsewhere. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SweetFancyMoses Posted March 30, 2022 Share Posted March 30, 2022 22 hours ago, WizardHawk said: I don’t think he’s ever going to be on Frederick’s level. He probably fits somewhere between above average and good. Could use an increase his strength. That said, it wouldn’t stop me from drafting Linderbaum if the cards fell right and I don’t mean at pick 24. It's doubtful Linderbaum will be on Fredericks level. He's not really known for his strength. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texas_OutLaw7 Posted March 30, 2022 Share Posted March 30, 2022 30 minutes ago, SweetFancyMoses said: It's doubtful Linderbaum will be on Fredericks level. He's not really known for his strength. But if he could be a Kelce it would be incredible. FredBeard was strong, sure. But he handled all the OL calls too. Very smart player. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the lone star Posted April 8, 2022 Author Share Posted April 8, 2022 I'd like an upgrade. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matts4313 Posted April 9, 2022 Share Posted April 9, 2022 I hate how this forum refuses to believe an "upgrade" can be simple player growth. Even though weve seen it with Diggs and Steele just this year. Or that player replacements can be on the team already, like what we are seeing with Zeke/Pollard. Laroi Glover/Jay Ratliff. I know you dont want to baseline that for you strategy, but it happens. A lot. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.