Dr LBC Posted December 18, 2017 Share Posted December 18, 2017 2 minutes ago, sammymvpknight said: Correct call...stupid rule. This is all correct. The part about Goodell isn't; he doesn't sit on the Competition Committee, some day people will learn this, I hope. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RamRod Posted December 18, 2017 Share Posted December 18, 2017 I don't even think trying to reach the ball over was necessary. If he brings it into his body he probably falls into the end zone before anyone touches him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kip Smithers Posted December 18, 2017 Share Posted December 18, 2017 Just now, Mazrimiv said: If the NFL wants to know why ratings are down, look no further than how PIT just lost to NE. Idiotic rules and slo-mo replay reviews are taking a lot of the entertainment factor out of the game. This is bull. That is not the reason lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soko Posted December 18, 2017 Share Posted December 18, 2017 I’m a benefactor of the call so I’m biased, but it seemed like the correct call by the letter or the rule. Just a garbage rule - almost as bad as the fumbling into the end zone rule. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlaqOptic Posted December 18, 2017 Share Posted December 18, 2017 Just now, Kip Smithers said: This is bull. That is not the reason lol. Then what is? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Hitch Posted December 18, 2017 Share Posted December 18, 2017 I knew the call was going to be overturned. How the game ended was just so unfortunate for the Steelers. It just happens to bobble up into the hands of a Patriot for an intereception. Of course it does. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
atmer Posted December 18, 2017 Share Posted December 18, 2017 1 minute ago, RamRod said: I don't even think trying to reach the ball over was necessary. If he brings it into his body he probably falls into the end zone before anyone touches him. It was just like that Dez catch against the Packers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mazrimiv Posted December 18, 2017 Share Posted December 18, 2017 1 minute ago, Kip Smithers said: This is bull. That is not the reason lol. This is bull. It is the reason. See how easy that was? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flounch Posted December 18, 2017 Share Posted December 18, 2017 So on the run it's okay, but on a pass it's not ? DAMNNNN Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kip Smithers Posted December 18, 2017 Share Posted December 18, 2017 Just now, BlaqOptic said: Then what is? A lot of other reasons, controversial calls have been going since the dawn of time. Believe me the rules are not the reason for a decline. That’s just baseless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetzger Posted December 18, 2017 Share Posted December 18, 2017 I was at work so I missed most of the game, was AB's injury serious? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlaqOptic Posted December 18, 2017 Share Posted December 18, 2017 Just now, atmer said: It was just like that Dez catch against the Packers. Except James wasn't contacted until after the ball crossed the plane. Like, literally, if James decides to make the move after falling to the ground it's not even a question which is why the rule is absolutely stupid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TXsteeler Posted December 18, 2017 Share Posted December 18, 2017 4 minutes ago, Kip Smithers said: Huh. The ball touched the ground clearly, how else did it move? If the ball Moves then it’s not completing the process. Ground touches his hands which are touching the ball? How is that hard to grasp? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaidersAreOne Posted December 18, 2017 Share Posted December 18, 2017 I missed the controversial play everyone is talking about. Can someone give me a rundown quickly? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mazrimiv Posted December 18, 2017 Share Posted December 18, 2017 Just now, Kip Smithers said: A lot of other reasons, controversial calls have been going since the dawn of time. Believe me the rules are not the reason for a decline. That’s just baseless. Why should I believe you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.