taylor made Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 2 minutes ago, MKnight82 said: I agree with this. I brought this up in the other thread. Trading up for a WR makes more sense to me than an OT I would only do it for Brian Thomas, Jr. You wouldn't have to trade up that far compared to the OT either. Could keep one of seconds maybe. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
e16bball Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 Curious, why WR over OT as a trade up option? Roster is (substantially) better at WR than at OT. Draft pool is (substantially) deeper at WR than OT. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lavar703 Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 1 minute ago, MikeT14 said: I feel like if he did it wouldn’t be Daniels They said as a DC the QB he'd hate to face more is the one that could kill him with his legs as well. Sounds about right. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lavar703 Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 Just now, e16bball said: Curious, why WR over OT as a trade up option? Roster is (substantially) better at WR than at OT. Draft pool is (substantially) deeper at WR than OT. Who needs an OT when you're getting the greatest QB prospect ever Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ripsean21 Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 Here we go fellas!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lavar703 Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 God I miss the old Saturday and Sunday early April all day long NFL drafts lol. No red carpet, no celebrities. Just 8 hours of draft coverage each day 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigTimeRedskins Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 What's the point of the Bears taking more than 30 seconds on their pick? As a courtesy to the teams drafting 2-32 or what? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MKnight82 Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 8 minutes ago, e16bball said: Curious, why WR over OT as a trade up option? Roster is (substantially) better at WR than at OT. Draft pool is (substantially) deeper at WR than OT. Personally I believe WR is a more valuable position than OT Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeT14 Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 1 minute ago, BigTimeRedskins said: What's the point of the Bears taking more than 30 seconds on their pick? As a courtesy to the teams drafting 2-32 or what? I think it’s mandated they burn clock Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MKnight82 Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 Over/Under 20 Eminem songs played by ESPN tonight? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lavar703 Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 Please football gods! Please intervene lol. Save us from doing something stupid 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ripsean21 Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 3 minutes ago, MKnight82 said: Over/Under 20 Eminem songs played by ESPN tonight? Def over lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ripsean21 Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 (edited) 7 minutes ago, MKnight82 said: Personally I believe WR is a more valuable position than OT Detroit basically said it is. But having a truely special OL is a lot harder than having a truely special WR. Edited April 26 by ripsean21 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MKnight82 Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 ON THE CLOCK Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
naptownskinsfan Posted April 26 Author Share Posted April 26 And now the real draft can begin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.