Jaire_Island Posted February 3, 2022 Share Posted February 3, 2022 32 minutes ago, St Vince said: If Rodgers wants to be traded to Ten, give me Simmons. 2 firsts a 2nd and AJ Brown. The reason he might consider Ten is because of A J Brown. No way that trade will happen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packerraymond Posted February 3, 2022 Share Posted February 3, 2022 21 minutes ago, Toddfather said: I just dont see us trading him in the NFC... I mean, I guess anything can happen, but I doubt he is in Tampa. Trade him to the highest non NFC North bidder. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jleisher Posted February 3, 2022 Share Posted February 3, 2022 (edited) 23 minutes ago, Jaire_Island said: The reason he might consider Ten is because of A J Brown. No way that trade will happen Titians don't have the draft picks we would want. I would whether have the #9 pick instead of the #26th. Do they even own a pick in the second round this year? Edited February 3, 2022 by jleisher add Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norm Posted February 3, 2022 Share Posted February 3, 2022 It's impossible for them to move on from Tannehill isn't it? There's not much reason to discuss it after that. Like they literally can't do it and still have a roster basically 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWood21 Posted February 3, 2022 Share Posted February 3, 2022 1 minute ago, Norm said: It's impossible for them to move on from Tannehill isn't it? There's not much reason to discuss it after that. Like they literally can't do it and still have a roster basically It's pretty similar to Goff and the Rams last year. They only save money if they trade him. If they release him, they incur even more dead cap. I suppose he could be re-routed to a 3rd team but that makes a deal more difficult. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWood21 Posted February 3, 2022 Share Posted February 3, 2022 22 minutes ago, Packerraymond said: Trade him to the highest non NFC North bidder. This. At this point, whoever is offering the most is who I'm sending him to whether that be Denver or someone else. The only teams I'm not sending him to are Chicago, Detroit, and Minnesota. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWood21 Posted February 3, 2022 Share Posted February 3, 2022 45 minutes ago, Toddfather said: I just dont see us trading him in the NFC... I mean, I guess anything can happen, but I doubt he is in Tampa. Tampa Bay seems like an odd fit. The Packers likely want young, cheap defensive players in return, and that's not really something Tampa has in spades. Plus, it's got late picks and no extra picks of note. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWood21 Posted February 3, 2022 Share Posted February 3, 2022 13 minutes ago, jleisher said: Titians don't have the draft picks we would want. I would whether have the #9 pick instead of the #26th. Do they even own a pick in the second round this year? Hypothetically speaking, would you rather have the #9 pick plus Denver's pick next year OR Tennessee's next 3 first round picks including #26? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikemike778 Posted February 3, 2022 Share Posted February 3, 2022 25 minutes ago, Packerraymond said: Trade him to the highest non NFC North bidder. Is it that bad to trade him to NFC North ? If you want him traded then you must think the picks and cap space are worth more than Rodgers. On that basis you must think its a bad deal for the other side. So maybe trading in the NFC North isn't such a bad thing. Plus, whoever trades for Rodgers is better short term, maybe weaker long term. In that scenario we are probably not competing in 22 to hopefully be able to gear up for another run long term. So maybe having a rival strong around the time we are rebuilding (and weaker when we have reloaded) isn't a bad thing. If you took sentiment out of it (which is impossible I guess) then trading him to NFC North might be the best move sporting wise. If you believe that the picks and cap space are more valuable than Rodgers. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
{Family Ghost} Posted February 3, 2022 Share Posted February 3, 2022 2 minutes ago, mikemike778 said: Is it that bad to trade him to NFC North ? If you want him traded then you must think the picks and cap space are worth more than Rodgers. On that basis you must think its a bad deal for the other side. So maybe trading in the NFC North isn't such a bad thing. Plus, whoever trades for Rodgers is better short term, maybe weaker long term. In that scenario we are probably not competing in 22 to hopefully be able to gear up for another run long term. So maybe having a rival strong around the time we are rebuilding (and weaker when we have reloaded) isn't a bad thing. If you took sentiment out of it (which is impossible I guess) then trading him to NFC North might be the best move sporting wise. If you believe that the picks and cap space are more valuable than Rodgers. No .. not really. We could have got a lot more for Favre if they just would have bit the bullet and shipped him to Minny. Instead we exiled him tp the Jets for a crappy return and then watched him get himself to Minny the next year. I think in this case we are going to get some great offers to ship Rodgers far away. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
packfanfb Posted February 3, 2022 Share Posted February 3, 2022 16 minutes ago, CWood21 said: Tampa Bay seems like an odd fit. The Packers likely want young, cheap defensive players in return, and that's not really something Tampa has in spades. Plus, it's got late picks and no extra picks of note. Give me Winfield and Tryon, plus a bunch of picks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gypsy1027 Posted February 3, 2022 Share Posted February 3, 2022 Trading Rodgers to an NFC North team certainly is an interesting thought. No matter how fans feel about moving ARod to a team like the Vikes and repeating the Brett Favre experience, I think many would have to admit the Packers likely would get the highest price/draft picks in return for such a deal. And I think you have a good point about the long-term negative consequences of depleting an opponent of draft choices on the long term. All that said, however, you have to wonder if the front office--Murphy and Gutekunst--would have the guts to seriously consider making such a move. A major surge of negative reaction could well cost them their employment status. Both of those men like walking out on stage for the Packer shareholder meetings to a chorus of cheers--not a hail of rotten tomatoes or worse. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWood21 Posted February 3, 2022 Share Posted February 3, 2022 7 minutes ago, packfanfb said: Give me Winfield and Tryon, plus a bunch of picks. They're not giving up Winfield in a Rodgers' package. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toddfather Posted February 3, 2022 Share Posted February 3, 2022 25 minutes ago, CWood21 said: Hypothetically speaking, would you rather have the #9 pick plus Denver's pick next year OR Tennessee's next 3 first round picks including #26? Agreed, thats why I was surprised by the odds that were posted. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packerraymond Posted February 3, 2022 Share Posted February 3, 2022 27 minutes ago, mikemike778 said: Is it that bad to trade him to NFC North ? If you want him traded then you must think the picks and cap space are worth more than Rodgers. On that basis you must think its a bad deal for the other side. So maybe trading in the NFC North isn't such a bad thing. Plus, whoever trades for Rodgers is better short term, maybe weaker long term. In that scenario we are probably not competing in 22 to hopefully be able to gear up for another run long term. So maybe having a rival strong around the time we are rebuilding (and weaker when we have reloaded) isn't a bad thing. If you took sentiment out of it (which is impossible I guess) then trading him to NFC North might be the best move sporting wise. If you believe that the picks and cap space are more valuable than Rodgers. You don't trade star players in your division, this is just an unwritten rule of every sports league. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.