Jump to content

Random Packer News & Notes


Leader

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Norm said:

Which he never even claimed to have, people just pretended he was their secret inside source on Twitter

Exactly - typically people with sources don’t flaunt they have sources unless they’re in journalism. Jmo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A big NO to trading a 1st round pick for Metcalf. You give up the pick and then have to pay Metcalf huge money the next few years. Packers have the draft capital to get one of the top WR's in the draft, and then you have that player relatively cheaply for the next 4 years. The key to getting out of the Packers current salary cap situation is to draft well, and draft often. Trading high draft picks for high priced veterans is the opposite of what hey should do. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Brat&Beer said:

A big NO to trading a 1st round pick for Metcalf. You give up the pick and then have to pay Metcalf huge money the next few years. Packers have the draft capital to get one of the top WR's in the draft, and then you have that player relatively cheaply for the next 4 years. The key to getting out of the Packers current salary cap situation is to draft well, and draft often. Trading high draft picks for high priced veterans is the opposite of what hey should do. 

Can't say I agree. Let's not forget, the draft is far from a guarantee. Just look at the news today that the Pats are shopping N'Keal Harry, first round pick from two years ago who's had under 600 career yards. 

We can look at Metcalf as a player who's already developed, is young, and would be effectively on a 2 year $26m deal that's heavily backpaid (thanks to the tag). That's way below market value for a player of his caliber, he fits what we're looking for from the MVS role and it works perfectly with our current anticipated championship window of two years. Lowers the pressure on whoever steps in to the Adams role and helps us spread the ball more in the way the offense was designed.

I'd try to convince Seattle to do it for less than a first, but I imagine there will be some bidding. They're already locked in with Lockett's pretty much immovable contact and are facing a rebuild anyway where trading DK could net them the draft capital they need to get back to contention sooner rather than later. 

That said the Jets might be just Jets enough to offer one of their top ten picks for him.

Edited by Sandy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Sandy said:

Can't say I agree. Let's not forget, the draft is far from a guarantee. Just look at the news today that the Pats are shopping N'Keal Harry, first round pick from two years ago who's had under 600 career yards. 

We can look at Metcalf as a player who's already developed, is young, and would be effectively on a 2 year $26m deal that's heavily backpaid (thanks to the tag). That's way below market value for a player of his caliber, he fits what we're looking for from the MVS role and it works perfectly with our current anticipated championship window of two years. Lowers the pressure on whoever steps in to the Adams role and helps us spread the ball more in the way the offense was designed.

I'd try to convince Seattle to do it for less than a first, but I imagine there will be some bidding. They're already locked in with Lockett's pretty much immovable contact and are facing a rebuild anyway where trading DK could net them the draft capital they need to get back to contention sooner rather than later. 

That said the Jets might be just Jets enough to offer one of their top ten picks for him.

You hit the nail on the head. Also the Packers are trying to win within the next few years. Who cares what the cap hell looks like 4 years from now? They are trying to leverage the current situation with AR now. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Packerraymond said:

My sources are telling me this is probably a hangover.

It's not so ha. FU.

You sound like my boss. Every time I take an Advil or something he's like "oh hungover?" No, I don't drink EVERY day. And I rarely get hungover anyways. You just work my like a dog.

Just one more damn Saturday and I'll be done with this 6 days a week for 7 of the last 8 weeks. Can't come fast enough. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Norm said:

It's not so ha. FU.

You sound like my boss. Every time I take an Advil or something he's like "oh hungover?" No, I don't drink EVERY day. And I rarely get hungover anyways. You just work my like a dog.

Just one more damn Saturday and I'll be done with this 6 days a week for 7 of the last 8 weeks. Can't come fast enough. 

Sorry my source was Adam Schefter. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Norm said:

It's not so ha. FU.

You sound like my boss. Every time I take an Advil or something he's like "oh hungover?" No, I don't drink EVERY day. And I rarely get hungover anyways. You just work my like a dog.

Just one more damn Saturday and I'll be done with this 6 days a week for 7 of the last 8 weeks. Can't come fast enough. 

I feel ya. Tax season can't end soon enough.

And that's my presumptuous post of the day

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...