Broncofan Posted April 26, 2018 Share Posted April 26, 2018 8 minutes ago, CWood21 said: Payne yes, Vea no. Vea gets away because he's so much bigger and stronger than Pac-12 OL. I don't see him having the same kind of success in the NFL. That being said, has Denver been linked to LVE? DEN has been linked to LVE, Elway's on record as saying ILB is a need he will address in the draft (I'd say a year late, forget my love for Reuben Foster at 1.20 last year, we should have drafted SOMEONE, but passed completely - ugh). For obvious reasons, we've not been linked to any Day 1 guys at 1.5. Elway's seen a ton of Boise players, and we have a history of taking them, being a regional team. But that's more likely in a 20's scenario with a 1.12/1.22 trade for 1.5 - which let's face it, I have no idea how realistic that is anymore, with a new top 3 Big Board in play (Mayfield-Barkley-QB). I think DEN will think more to stand pat or move up to 1.4 for Darnold if CLE wants Chubb. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Broncofan Posted April 26, 2018 Share Posted April 26, 2018 23 minutes ago, minutemancl said: I think it is Evans and Fitzpatrick. Rashaan Evans is going to be a hot commodity I think. There's a pretty good chance he goes before Edmunds even. 22 minutes ago, game3525 said: This is the likely list. Although I would replace LVE with Evans. He fits everything the Chargers look for in a prospect. I think the pick is going to be Payne or Evans. How important is pass coverage with your ILB's? Because Evans is more a sideline-to-sideline run guy who is also a pass rush monster on passing downs than a blanket cover guy that LVE represents. It's why I think LVE gets more love than Evans, in today's NFL that pass coverage skill gets more love than being a pass rush ILB. If your scheme uses more pass rush, I could see Evans over LVE. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeT14 Posted April 26, 2018 Share Posted April 26, 2018 1 hour ago, Broncofan said: NO 1st, 3rd, 2019 1st & 3rd to whoever owns 14. To get past ARI. Skins could do that for 13 I think. Future capital and get their 3rd back this year. Maybe get Guice late first now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Broncofan Posted April 26, 2018 Share Posted April 26, 2018 Just now, MikeT14 said: Skins could do that for 13 I think. Future capital and get their 3rd back this year. Maybe get Guice late first now. If you guys really want Guice, you should be all over that. He's an awful pick that early value-wise. 2nd best RB, probably IRL. But 13? No way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forge Posted April 26, 2018 Share Posted April 26, 2018 1 minute ago, Broncofan said: If you guys really want Guice, you should be all over that. He's an awful pick that early value-wise. 2nd best RB, probably IRL. But 13? No way. Agreed. If Guice is the target, make that deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWood21 Posted April 26, 2018 Share Posted April 26, 2018 1 minute ago, Broncofan said: If you guys really want Guice, you should be all over that. He's an awful pick that early value-wise. 2nd best RB, probably IRL. But 13? No way. Speaking of Guice, how much does that lying about the interview questions hurt him? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeT14 Posted April 26, 2018 Share Posted April 26, 2018 1 minute ago, Broncofan said: If you guys really want Guice, you should be all over that. He's an awful pick that early value-wise. 2nd best RB, probably IRL. But 13? No way. Of everyone we seem to be targeting (Guice, Vea, Payne, the top two safeties), Guice is the only one that would be there. So, I think that's how that trade would have to work. Guice, or maybe a guard? Ragnow? Price? I'm liking it though! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeT14 Posted April 26, 2018 Share Posted April 26, 2018 Just now, CWood21 said: Speaking of Guice, how much does that lying about the interview questions hurt him? If you buy that he was lying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
game3525 Posted April 26, 2018 Share Posted April 26, 2018 1 minute ago, Broncofan said: How important is pass coverage with your ILB's? Because Evans is more a sideline-to-sideline run guy who is also a pass rush monster on passing downs than a blanket cover guy that LVE represents. It's why I think LVE gets more love than Evans, in today's NFL that pass coverage skill gets more love than being a pass rush ILB. It is important, but I think Evans is better in coverage then people give him credit for. The thing about Evans is the team is big on versatility. He can start at SAM and then slide over to Mike if/when Perryman gets hurt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWood21 Posted April 26, 2018 Share Posted April 26, 2018 Just now, MikeT14 said: Of everyone we seem to be targeting (Guice, Vea, Payne, the top two safeties), Guice is the only one that would be there. So, I think that's how that trade would have to work. Guice, or maybe a guard? Ragnow? Price? I'm liking it though! Seems like the anti-Dan Snyder move though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scalamania Posted April 26, 2018 Share Posted April 26, 2018 22 minutes ago, minutemancl said: A big lmao to Reality_Check. Assuming you're talking about him "leaking" the first pick and getting mauled by the media over it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWood21 Posted April 26, 2018 Share Posted April 26, 2018 Just now, MikeT14 said: If you buy that he was lying. Considering the investigation was closed with no proof the questions were asked... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forge Posted April 26, 2018 Share Posted April 26, 2018 Just now, CWood21 said: Speaking of Guice, how much does that lying about the interview questions hurt him? If I'm a GM, I certainly don't love it. Does add a certain degree of trust issues with him and it's the Gms that he made look really bad with that crap. Do I think it will kill his stock? No. I think he's still going fringe first, early second. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeT14 Posted April 26, 2018 Share Posted April 26, 2018 Just now, CWood21 said: Considering the investigation was closed with no proof the questions were asked... Again, it reeks of cover your you know what too. It just depends on who you believe. I don't get why he would make it up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
49erurtaza Posted April 26, 2018 Share Posted April 26, 2018 2 minutes ago, MikeT14 said: If you buy that he was lying. Didn't he admit to lying or not being totally honest about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.