skywindO2 Posted August 13, 2017 Share Posted August 13, 2017 16 minutes ago, iPwn said: Okay. We gotta talk about your stuffed burgers. Why are you paying for them and not doing it yourself? Cause I'm lazy. The bar down the street from me makes a peanut butter jucy lucy style burger that I need to try now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cakeshoppe Posted August 13, 2017 Share Posted August 13, 2017 Wait, black panther is typically used in the US to a refer to a melanistic cougar (aka puma, mountain lion). There are no recorded instances of black panthers (cougars) in the wild. Jaguars exist in the US only in the extreme southern end of Arizona, and even there they are exceedingly rare. I suppose it's possible that you could say that since neither melanistic jaguars nor menalistic cougars occur in the relavant part of the US, that the phrase could be used to refer to either, but mammalogists treat the term (in the majority of the US, primarily used in the southeast) as referring to a melanistic cougar Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pwny Posted August 13, 2017 Author Share Posted August 13, 2017 Just now, catcheryea said: and i still contend that raiders is too broad. it would be like calling a team the cats Raider is a subset of a single species. So not the same at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mse326 Posted August 13, 2017 Share Posted August 13, 2017 1 minute ago, iPwn said: All vikings were raiders. All buccaneers were Raiders. Raider is an amorphous word. But there were Vikings that didn't raid anything and just settled new areas that were previously uninhabited. And Buccaneers aside from ist's early usage not being pirates at all, also refers to privateers that were technically acting legally. Raiders, while undefinted, are at least pretty much unanimously considered to be acting unlawfully. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ramssuperbowl99 Posted August 13, 2017 Share Posted August 13, 2017 3 minutes ago, devils1854 said: Where does sex panther fall in all of this? It's made with bits of real panther, so it clearly counts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ramssuperbowl99 Posted August 13, 2017 Share Posted August 13, 2017 @catcheryea look at what you did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
catcheryea Posted August 13, 2017 Share Posted August 13, 2017 Just now, iPwn said: Raider is a subset of a single species. So not the same at all. but raiding doesn't allude to anything specific. it's just a general word for an action Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pwny Posted August 13, 2017 Author Share Posted August 13, 2017 Just now, catcheryea said: but raiding doesn't allude to anything specific. it's just a general word for an action Not sure why that matters? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pwny Posted August 13, 2017 Author Share Posted August 13, 2017 Just now, ramssuperbowl99 said: @catcheryea look at what you did. I just wanted to make a snarky reply. I didn’t expect this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
catcheryea Posted August 13, 2017 Share Posted August 13, 2017 Just now, ramssuperbowl99 said: @catcheryea look at what you did. not the conversation we need, but the one we deserve Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
catcheryea Posted August 13, 2017 Share Posted August 13, 2017 1 minute ago, iPwn said: Not sure why that matters? why did you say this like any of this matters? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
catcheryea Posted August 13, 2017 Share Posted August 13, 2017 1 hour ago, jfinley88 said: @Bednarik60 @Gmen4ev @mission27 @thelawoffices @El ramster @champ11 @bkobow05 @JBURGE25 @MathMan @Its A Sabotage @IrishGreen @Adrenaline_Flux @utley4568 @catcheryea & @ anyone i didn't tag new FF fantasy league or whats up yeah i would be super down 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDOG_det Posted August 13, 2017 Share Posted August 13, 2017 1 hour ago, jfinley88 said: @Bednarik60 @Gmen4ev @mission27 @thelawoffices @El ramster @champ11 @bkobow05 @JBURGE25 @MathMan @Its A Sabotage @IrishGreen @Adrenaline_Flux @utley4568 & @ anyone i didn't tag new FF fantasy league or whats up I thought about starting a devy league on here, but idk if enough people would be interested and it might be a little too late to recruit enough people Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pwny Posted August 13, 2017 Author Share Posted August 13, 2017 6 minutes ago, mse326 said: And Buccaneers aside from ist's early usage not being pirates at all, also refers to privateers that were technically acting legally. Well no. The English, French and Dutch licensed their work, but plundering Spanish ships was still illegal under Spanish law. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mse326 Posted August 13, 2017 Share Posted August 13, 2017 Just now, iPwn said: Well no. The English, French and Dutch licensed their work, but plundering Spanish ships was still illegal under Spanish law. Again "Raiders" is amorphous. But I think pretty much everyone would at least say it isn't under color of law. They still acted under color of law even if not every jurisdiction would recognize it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts