Jump to content

Who gets in Hall of Fame 1st of 2004 QB Class?


x0x

Hall of Fame QBs  

71 members have voted

  1. 1. Who gets in 1st?

    • Eli Manning
      15
    • Ben Roethlisberger
      52
    • Philip Rivers
      4


Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, lancerman said:

Yeah I’m arguing he shouldn’t go first ballot. He should still go in 

That's what I said in my latest post that you were disputing as though I was continuing to argue he was a 1st ballot caliber player. 

Edited by C0LTSFAN4L1F3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ben. The other two shouldn't get in. Eli should join Plunkett in the exclusive group of QBs who have won multiple SBs but don't get in the HoF. Rivers? He has been a top 5 QB, but I'd say he hasn't been there consistently enough and hasn't had the playoff success (yes, that matters) to get into the HoF.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
On ‎2‎/‎11‎/‎2019 at 12:01 AM, JustAnotherFan said:

How I think it will probably go in order: Ben-Eli-Rivers.....in that order.

How I think it should go: Ben and that's it. MAYBE Rivers years later.

Eli should not get in, but will. Ben should. Rivers, I'm on the fence about.

 

I agree with you but the crazy thing is Rivers is better than both them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rivers has had the worse teams by a good margin. Like overall if you're ranking Top 10 season by team support, Roethlisberger is arguably Top 3 teams. The 2006 Chargers were great don't get me wrong but they were very offensive minded and because of Schotty not built for the playoffs. There's a lot of high powered offensive teams in the regular season we don't think too much of but because of LT that team might stand out for a while. Aside from that? I do think Eli carried a largely mediocre squad in 2011, perhaps the worst overall team to ever win it, maybe. The 2007 version however just under-performed in the regular season but showed up in the playoffs and was a very good defense. So I think Rivers has more low-end contending teams but it can be argued the 07 Giants were better than the 06 Chargers.

Now, the stats also point to Rivers being more efficient and I think that's fair. Roethlisberger's numbers started to explode when he got Bell and Brown. That isn't a coincidence. Rivers after LT has not really had an amazing back and his receivers outside Gates have been largely inconsistent.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, x0x said:

Rivers has had the worse teams by a good margin. Like overall if you're ranking Top 10 season by team support, Roethlisberger is arguably Top 3 teams. The 2006 Chargers were great don't get me wrong but they were very offensive minded and because of Schotty not built for the playoffs. There's a lot of high powered offensive teams in the regular season we don't think too much of but because of LT that team might stand out for a while. Aside from that? I do think Eli carried a largely mediocre squad in 2011, perhaps the worst overall team to ever win it, maybe. The 2007 version however just under-performed in the regular season but showed up in the playoffs and was a very good defense. So I think Rivers has more low-end contending teams but it can be argued the 07 Giants were better than the 06 Chargers.

Now, the stats also point to Rivers being more efficient and I think that's fair. Roethlisberger's numbers started to explode when he got Bell and Brown. That isn't a coincidence. Rivers after LT has not really had an amazing back and his receivers outside Gates have been largely inconsistent.

The 2006 Chargers had a very good defense. That front 7 was beastly. Merriman, Phillips, Edwards, Williams, Castillo, and a couple solid complimentary pieces. The 06 and 07 Chargers were definitely complete teams and great supporting casts for Rivers. The better argument there is that by the time Rivers himself developed and became great, the supporting cast no longer was. Rivers's rise coincided with the decline/retirement of LT, Merriman, Edwards, Williams, etc. Don't downplay that 2006 team though. 7th in scoring D, and the defense had a much better playoff showing that year than the offense did. 3 picks off Brady and like 40 rushing yards allowed against the Pats.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Jakuvious said:

The 2006 Chargers had a very good defense. That front 7 was beastly. Merriman, Phillips, Edwards, Williams, Castillo, and a couple solid complimentary pieces. The 06 and 07 Chargers were definitely complete teams and great supporting casts for Rivers. The better argument there is that by the time Rivers himself developed and became great, the supporting cast no longer was. Rivers's rise coincided with the decline/retirement of LT, Merriman, Edwards, Williams, etc. Don't downplay that 2006 team though. 7th in scoring D, and the defense had a much better playoff showing that year than the offense did. 3 picks off Brady and like 40 rushing yards allowed against the Pats.

Yeah, the 2006 and 2007 Chargers were great teams (I still think they would have gotten to the SB in 2007 if Tomlinson, Gates, and Rivers were all healthy for the AFC championship game). Like you said, Rivers problem is when he entered his prime, the three best players on the team (LT, Williams, and Merriman) hit the wall and AJ Smith never really replaced them, which I don't really hold against him. Two of those guys were HOF talents and the other was on HOF trajectory. It is hard to replace those kinds of players.

Edited by game3525
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On ‎2‎/‎11‎/‎2019 at 2:11 PM, Starless said:

Roethlisberger is the obvious choice based on his actual on-field track record, but the voters may choose to hold him back a year or two in some impotent protest over the allegations against him. 

Rivers is more deserving than Manning, but Manning is more likely to make it because muh Super Bowlz.

Why is he an obvious choice. Dude has been surrounded by more talent consistently, than any other QB has in the league. I see nothing special about him than being though and gritty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, MrnastiesNO said:

Why is he an obvious choice. Dude has been surrounded by more talent consistently, than any other QB has in the league. I see nothing special about him than being though and gritty.

Since when does the HOF consider supporting cast? He's won more than Rivers and consistently put up better numbers than Manning. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/4/2019 at 2:43 PM, MrnastiesNO said:

Why is he an obvious choice. Dude has been surrounded by more talent consistently, than any other QB has in the league. I see nothing special about him than being though and gritty.

Yeah, he's always had elite offensive lines (Oh wait), and elite halfbacks (Oh wait), and elite defenses (Oh wait), and elite Receivers (maybe the one argument you could make although he made and won Super Bowls with Cedric Wilson, Antwaan Randle El and Jerricho Cotchery as 2nd/3rd/4th options).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...