gdt8: mesomorphic peckers versus KC kief's 2019 exclusive (MNF): bashaud's return to gorgeos green bay 2019 + "the incomparable" tony brown recoups his starting position PART UN

[packfanfb]

Just now, Cakeshoppe said:

Doesn’t he have turf toe? That’s typically a 3-4 week injury to my understanding

There are varying grades of turf toe, but there hasn't been any indication that it was a high grade injury. I've been hoping all along that GB was trying to get to this week against KC before bringing him back. We will see. 

[Scoremore]

10 minutes ago, packfanfb said:

Absolutely no reason why Adams should be out that long unless the guy heals like a 70-year old man. Rapoport initially reported after it happened that "he might miss a game." Either he was wrong in a big way or Adams should be ready to come back. He's been out basically a full month. 

Had ligament damage.  Packers will be smart.  We don't need him against KC or San Diego.  No reason to rush him and have a set back.   Hate when you guys cite "initial reports"  totally meaningless.  They said Savage "just tweeked his ankle"  not expected to miss much time.  Wrong.  First he has to get the toe 100% and then he has to practice before he can play.  SF is the target make no mistake.

[Jaire_Island]

2 minutes ago, Scoremore said:

Had ligament damage.  Packers will be smart.  We don't need him against KC or San Diego.  No reason to rush him and have a set back.   Hate when you guys cite "initial reports"  totally meaningless.  They said Savage "just tweeked his ankle"  not expected to miss much time.  Wrong.  First he has to get the toe 100% and then he has to practice before he can play.  SF is the target make no mistake.

Perfect.

[packfanfb]

1 minute ago, Scoremore said:

Had ligament damage.  Packers will be smart.  We don't need him against KC or San Diego.  No reason to rush him and have a set back.   Hate when you guys cite "initial reports"  totally meaningless.  They said Savage "just tweeked his ankle"  not expected to miss much time.  Wrong.  First he has to get the toe 100% and then he has to practice before he can play.  SF is the target make no mistake.

Why because we beat a few teams without him? This line of thinking always makes me laugh. You're going to think you don't need him until you lose, then you're only going to be able to wish you had him. 

[Ragnar Danneskjold]

9 minutes ago, packfanfb said:

There are varying grades of turf toe, but there hasn't been any indication that it was a high grade injury. I've been hoping all along that GB was trying to get to this week against KC before bringing him back. We will see. 

Jason Wilde and Mark Tauscher had a quote form Adams yesterday which lead me to believe that it is not looking good for this week, but next week may be likely.  We will see.  

Fortunately the Packers brought the best foot and ankle specialist in to practice in Green Bay, so I don't doubt that he and Savage are getting what they need.

[Leader]

6 minutes ago, Scoremore said:

Had ligament damage.  Packers will be smart.  We don't need him against KC or San Diego.  No reason to rush him and have a set back.   Hate when you guys cite "initial reports"  totally meaningless.  They said Savage "just tweeked his ankle"  not expected to miss much time.  Wrong.  First he has to get the toe 100% and then he has to practice before he can play.  SF is the target make no mistake.

Who you talking about here with the ligament damage?

[Scoremore]

1 minute ago, packfanfb said:

Why because we beat a few teams without him? This line of thinking always makes me laugh. You're going to think you don't need him until you lose, then you're only going to be able to wish you had him. 

I suppose it would be better to rush him back before he's ready only to have him re-injure his toe and have it dog him the rest of the season.  If we lose we lose and it won't be because a less than 100% DaVante isn't on the field.  This game is on the Defense they need to step up.  If anything losing Savage is much more concerning.  

[Scoremore]

5 minutes ago, Leader said:

Who you talking about here with the ligament damage?

DaVante in his toe.  It was a pretty severe turf toe injury.  Thing has to fully heal up and that takes time.

[Leader]

8 minutes ago, Scoremore said:

DaVante in his toe.  It was a pretty severe turf toe injury.  Thing has to fully heal up and that takes time.

Okay. Yeah, thats what turf toe is to some degree but I wanted to be certain you werent referring to Savage.

[gopackgo247]

Mahomes practiced today in a limited fashion. if he plays on Sunday thats bull****. he dislocated his knee cap. cmon. 

[jleisher]

15 hours ago, Hoodie89 said:

Unpopular opinion so go ahead and lay it on me, but I don't find these gameday posts funny nor useful. If I was glancing and trying to get basic game details (e.g. date, time, location, injury list), which is how the first post in these threads used to be in years past, they are nowhere to be found. Additionally, if I was a lurker or someone who stumbled across this site and was wondering if I should get involved with posting, a bunch of inside jokes that aren't very funny that come off as weird is not how I'd want our forum and team portrayed. It used to be useful info with a few random inside jokes thrown in for the people who browse and post regularly, but that is so far from what this is now.

Like I said, unpopular opinion because everyone seems to like it. Just wanted to give my two cents.

Not everybody does!

[Pugger]

1 hour ago, ThatJerkDave said:

As long as it keeps working, we will keep doing it.  

Sounds good to me.  lol  It just took me a while to figure it all out.  Senility has its drawbacks.  

[packfanfb]

12 minutes ago, gopackgo247 said:

Mahomes practiced today in a limited fashion. if he plays on Sunday thats bull****. he dislocated his knee cap. cmon. 

No way he plays. This is all smoke. 

[Rainmaker90]

1 hour ago, packfanfb said:

Why because we beat a few teams without him? This line of thinking always makes me laugh. You're going to think you don't need him until you lose, then you're only going to be able to wish you had him. 

The offense should be able to score without him. I'm not risking his long term health for a game @ KC. 

[Arthur Penske]

1 hour ago, packfanfb said:

Why because we beat a few teams without him? This line of thinking always makes me laugh. You're going to think you don't need him until you lose, then you're only going to be able to wish you had him. 

So you'd advocate potentially rushing him back for a game or two you might need him in to risk reinjury for someone you're going to need down the stretch? That line of thinking isn't smart.