K9 Posted September 29, 2017 Share Posted September 29, 2017 2 minutes ago, Jetzger said: Kinda hoping Green Bay piles it on now. it's happening.. still another qtr to go Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flyers0909 Posted September 29, 2017 Share Posted September 29, 2017 Adams reportedly has feeling in all his extremities. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWood21 Posted September 29, 2017 Share Posted September 29, 2017 Just now, jrry32 said: No, you didn't. You are overreacting to a Packer getting hurt by proposing the NFL implement a rule that is loathed in college. You have provided no evidence that your reasoning behind it is anything but pretext. You are upset about a dirty play and proposing a half-baked solution. Lulz. You're not even trying to talk football. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
incognito_man Posted September 29, 2017 Share Posted September 29, 2017 Just now, drd23 said: There's also this rule that would apply yep, there are likely a few. obvious penalty. obvious dirty hit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWood21 Posted September 29, 2017 Share Posted September 29, 2017 Just now, flyers0909 said: Adams reportedly has feeling in all his extremities. I wish I could like this more than once. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWood21 Posted September 29, 2017 Share Posted September 29, 2017 1 minute ago, drd23 said: There's also this rule that would apply But it's not a penalty...or at least I was told. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ragnarok Posted September 29, 2017 Share Posted September 29, 2017 4 minutes ago, CWood21 said: The NFL isn't going to suspend a player, let's be real about this. LIS, if you have issues with implementation then tweak the rule. You get called for a targeting call in the game, you're allowed to play and if you receive a 2nd one during the game you're immediately ejected. At the end of the week's game, the NFL reviews those targeting calls AND if the player is deemed to have illegally "targeting" that player, he is automatically suspended the next week. Your complaints are with the implementation of the rule, not the reason the rule in place. They suspended Burfict after the fact once they reviewed the evidence. I agree that my complaints are with the implementation. The reason why it's there is 100% justified. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kiwibrown Posted September 29, 2017 Share Posted September 29, 2017 Just now, Ragnarok said: I do. But your statement was reactionary and..considering he gave a thumbs up...just untrue. If you almost legitimately die...you don't give a thumbs up a few minutes later. His C-spine was compromised. It can lead to instant death in multiple ways. If you got shot at and it missed your head, you nearly died. If you have an injury that nearly tears your spine as above. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrry32 Posted September 29, 2017 Share Posted September 29, 2017 1 minute ago, Carmen Cygni said: Calling for an in-game ejection for such a violation is not a weak argument. Emotions overflow and then you have the opposition in a viable retaliation mode. Removing the guilty player from the field of play eliminates such possible overreactions. When you make the in-game ejection an option, you either have to make it automatic or discretionary. If it's automatic, you have guys getting tossed for unintentional or incidental contact to the head. If you make it discretionary, you have the refs making judgment calls that could completely change the game. It's a bad idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlexGreen#20 Posted September 29, 2017 Share Posted September 29, 2017 Just now, Ragnarok said: They suspended Burfict after the fact once they reviewed the evidence. I agree that my complaints are with the implementation. The reason why it's there is 100% justified. Burfict also has a LONG history of dirty plays. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWood21 Posted September 29, 2017 Share Posted September 29, 2017 Just now, Ragnarok said: They suspended Burfict after the fact once they reviewed the evidence. I agree that my complaints are with the implementation. The reason why it's there is 100% justified. Burfict has had how many "bad" tackles? LIS, my proposal is something that the suspension/ejection wouldn't occur until the NFL has had a thorough chance to review the play, not just a split moment decision. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forge Posted September 29, 2017 Share Posted September 29, 2017 6 minutes ago, Kiwibrown said: use a sentence, moron. @Kiwibrown There's absolutely no call for this. You know that personal attacks, name calling, etc, is prohibited. Knock it off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pats#1 Posted September 29, 2017 Share Posted September 29, 2017 6 minutes ago, Onizuka said: Yep...but because he plays QB....he's making 30 million in 2 years? Lol......must be awesome to suck at your job and get overpaid. Unreal...don't the Bears know I'm available on the cheap and they would still lose embarrassingly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
malak1 Posted September 29, 2017 Share Posted September 29, 2017 I mean, Trubisky has to play now....right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrry32 Posted September 29, 2017 Share Posted September 29, 2017 1 minute ago, CWood21 said: Lulz. You're not even trying to talk football. Okay, CWood, push your bad rule because a Packer got hurt. Overreactions on this site are nothing new. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.