Soko Posted December 10, 2021 Share Posted December 10, 2021 7 hours ago, JonMcC2018 said: The 49ers. Jonathan Taylor is averaging an excellent 5.6 yards per carry. Throw in a replacement level running back who averages 4.6 yards per carry and that running back is still leading the NFL in yards. Based on the number of carried he gets Jonathan Taylor is essentially giving you an extra 18 yards per game than a replacement level running back in his position would do. Of course this is simplified somewhat, but individual running backs just don't move the needle that much. That’s…not how it works. That’s like saying: Cooper Kupp is averaging 13.7 YPC. Nelson Agholor averages 13 YPC. Therefore Kupp is only a 0.7 YPC improvement over Agholor, Agholor would lead the league in receiving if he was in Kupp’s spot. Doesn’t work that way. Can do that bad logic with about any stat, just doesn’t fly. And that’s assuming a street free agent you sign in December is going to come in and give every team 4.6 YPC? Which… come on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
childofpudding Posted December 10, 2021 Share Posted December 10, 2021 (edited) Great work on this. I'd love to see this using EPA/play instead of EPA+CPOE. I once had this debate online with some of the NFL analytics guys about it. EPA/play is more strongly correlated to offensive success than EPA+CPOE. CPOE just drags down the correlation, and is barely more correlated than completion percentage. EPA/play is on par with ANY/A in terms of its strength of correlation with offensive success measures such as points/drive, yards/drive and drive success rate. They keep pushing CPOE as a valuable measure because, they argue, it is predictive for EPA/play. But EPA/play is more predictive for offensive success. I also put together a passer rating alternative that used net yards per completion instead of yards per attempt as one of the four factors, so as to not overweigh completion percentage in the final rating. Its correlation with various measures of success was on par with ANY/A, which is just slightly below EPA/play by about 0.02 or so depending on which offensive success measure you use. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-LdJErWIOALfNaRPQqlXdElGGaR5rYGv/view There's also perhaps some fine-tuning you could do with this that uses the actual numbers for each metric rather than their rankings for each metric. As an example, let's say the 1st ranked QB in passer rating has a passer rating of 120, the 2nd ranked QB's is 119, and 3rd ranked QB's is 99. The rankings assume an equal drop in quality from 1 to 2 as 2 to 3, but the rating numbers clearly show that isn't the case. Probably more trouble than it's worth, as you'd have to normalize each metric to 100 and then do some kind of scaling where the top QB gets a ranking of 1 and everyone below gets a ranking of 1.xx or 2.xx or whatever. And PFF could muck that up if all you have is the ranking. Again, great work on this, and thank you. Edited December 10, 2021 by childofpudding 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RandyMossIsBoss Posted December 13, 2021 Author Share Posted December 13, 2021 On 12/10/2021 at 12:09 AM, JAF-N72EX said: It's too late tonight, but I can compile all the data to separate the two to give more options for you and others by negating whatever you feel is irrelevant (i.e if someone hates PFF then they can exclude them if they wish). I believe that's what @RandyMossIsBoss is aiming to do by posting a link to the raw data. But what I don't think he realizes that he is posting broken links that nobody can view. Hint. Hint RandyMoss. This link doesn't work for you? https://onedrive.live.com/view.aspx?resid=A163D2088A9013FD!2287&ithint=file%2cxlsx&authkey=!AMGGGgQH1bI9nYI (same link as what is in OP and most recent post). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JAF-N72EX Posted December 14, 2021 Share Posted December 14, 2021 17 hours ago, RandyMossIsBoss said: This link doesn't work for you? https://onedrive.live.com/view.aspx?resid=A163D2088A9013FD!2287&ithint=file%2cxlsx&authkey=!AMGGGgQH1bI9nYI (same link as what is in OP and most recent post). Yeah it does now. The problem was on my end.....I forgot how much microsoft hates vpn's. My mistake. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RandyMossIsBoss Posted December 23, 2021 Author Share Posted December 23, 2021 QB PR QBR PFF DVOA ANY/A EPA/CPOE Avg SD 1 Aaron Rodgers 1 1 5 1 2 1 1.8 1.5 +3 2 Matthew Stafford 2 3 8 4 1 4 3.7 2.2 +3 3 Kyler Murray 3 9 6 5 5 3 5.2 2.0 4 Tom Brady 7 4 2 2 6 12 5.5 3.5 5 Justin Herbert 8 2 3 6 7 10 6.0 2.8 6 Jimmy Garoppolo 5 10 14 3 3 2 6.2 4.4 7 Kirk Cousins 4 12 4 7 4 13 7.3 3.8 -4 8 Patrick Mahomes 12 6 16 9 8 5 9.3 3.7 +6 9 Josh Allen 11 7 9 12 14 8 10.2 2.4 10 Joe Burrow 6 17 1 23 11 7 10.8 7.3 11 Derek Carr 15 11 13 10 10 14 12.2 2.0 12 Dak Prescott 10 19 12 8 9 16 12.3 3.9 -3 13 Mac Jones 16 13 10 13 17 11 13.3 2.5 14 Teddy Bridgewater 14 20 18 11 16 6 14.2 4.6 15 Tua Tagovailoa 17 8 17 16 18 9 14.2 4.1 16 Carson Wentz 13 5 23 15 13 19 14.7 5.6 17 Russell Wilson 9 16 19 14 12 21 15.2 4.1 18 Jalen Hurts 24 21 11 20 19 18 18.8 4.0 19 Ryan Tannehill 26 14 7 27 26 15 19.2 7.6 20 Matt Ryan 19 18 15 22 21 23 19.7 2.7 21 Lamar Jackson 23 15 22 21 22 17 20.0 2.9 22 Baker Mayfield 20 26 24 17 15 22 20.7 3.8 23 Taylor Heinicke 22 22 26 18 23 20 21.8 2.5 24 Ben Roethlisberger 18 24 28 19 20 24 22.2 3.5 25 Daniel Jones 25 23 21 25 24 25 23.8 1.5 26 Jared Goff 21 27 27 24 25 26 25.0 2.1 27 Davis Mills 27 29 32 26 27 27 28.0 2.0 28 Taysom Hill 32 25 20 30 31 30 28.0 4.2 29 Justin Fields 28 31 25 29 30 28 28.5 1.9 30 Trevor Lawrence 29 28 30 28 29 29 28.8 0.7 31 Cam Newton 30 30 31 32 28 32 30.5 1.4 32 Zach Wilson 31 32 29 31 32 31 31.0 1.0 QBRank2021.xlsx @childofpudding added a tab with each metrics normalized 1-100 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forge Posted December 23, 2021 Share Posted December 23, 2021 You all wish you had a Jimmy G. Well guess what? You're in luck. This off season you can have your very own Jimmy G for the low, low price of a first round pick (plus shipping and handling). Act quickly, there is a very limited sample. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rocky_rams Posted December 23, 2021 Share Posted December 23, 2021 30 minutes ago, Forge said: You all wish you had a Jimmy G. Well guess what? You're in luck. This off season you can have your very own Jimmy G for the low, low price of a first round pick (plus shipping and handling). Act quickly, there is a very limited sample. But! If you order in the next ten minutes… Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nabbs4u Posted December 23, 2021 Share Posted December 23, 2021 2 hours ago, rocky_rams said: But! If you order in the next ten minutes… You get a box of Bon bons and two Juicy fruits. Order now! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RandyMossIsBoss Posted January 12, 2022 Author Share Posted January 12, 2022 QBs included threw 130+ passes. SD= standard deviation. QB PR QBR PFF DVOA ANY/A EPA/CPOE Avg SD 1 Aaron Rodgers 1 1 4 1 1 1 1.5 1.1 2 Tom Brady 8 2 1 2 5 5 3.8 2.4 3 Joe Burrow 2 12 2 16 2 2 6.0 5.8 4 Matthew Stafford 6 5 11 9 3 6 6.7 2.6 5 Justin Herbert 12 3 3 6 11 9 7.3 3.6 6 Dak Prescott 3 10 8 3 7 14 7.5 3.9 7 Patrick Mahomes 11 6 13 4 10 3 7.8 3.7 8 Kyler Murray 9 8 7 7 12 8 8.5 1.7 9 Kirk Cousins 4 16 5 8 4 15 8.7 5.0 10 Jimmy Garoppolo 10 15 17 5 6 4 9.5 5.0 11 Jameis Winston 7 4 19 10 8 11 9.8 4.7 12 Josh Allen 17 7 6 17 15 10 12.0 4.5 13 Russell Wilson 5 13 20 13 9 17 12.8 4.9 14 Derek Carr 15 14 15 12 13 16 14.2 1.3 15 Mac Jones 16 17 12 15 18 12 15.0 2.3 16 Teddy Bridgewater 13 24 21 11 17 7 15.5 5.8 17 Carson Wentz 14 11 23 18 14 22 17.0 4.4 18 Ryan Tannehill 21 9 9 31 25 13 18.0 8.3 19 Jalen Hurts 24 22 10 19 16 18 18.2 4.5 20 Tua Tagovailoa 20 20 25 20 21 19 20.8 2.0 21 Matt Ryan 19 25 16 24 20 23 21.2 3.1 22 Lamar Jackson 25 19 24 21 22 20 21.8 2.1 23 Jared Goff 18 30 31 22 23 27 25.2 4.6 24 Trevor Siemian 23 32 28 23 19 30 25.8 4.5 25 Daniel Jones 28 27 22 30 24 26 26.2 2.6 26 Mike White 35 18 39 14 31 21 26.3 9.2 27 Taylor Heinicke 27 29 33 25 29 24 27.8 3.0 28 Jacoby Brissett 30 21 14 35 35 33 28.0 7.9 29 Taysom Hill 34 26 18 29 30 34 28.5 5.5 30 Baker Mayfield 29 34 30 26 28 25 28.7 2.9 31 Davis Mills 22 33 36 27 26 32 29.3 4.7 32 Ben Roethlisberger 26 31 37 28 27 29 29.7 3.6 33 Tyler Huntley 33 23 26 32 38 28 30.0 4.9 34 Tyrod Taylor 32 28 35 37 34 31 32.8 2.9 35 Andy Dalton 31 37 27 34 33 36 33.0 3.3 36 Trevor Lawrence 37 35 32 33 32 37 34.3 2.1 37 Justin Fields 36 39 29 36 37 35 35.3 3.1 38 Sam Darnold 38 36 38 38 36 38 37.3 0.9 39 Zach Wilson 39 38 34 39 39 40 38.2 2.0 40 Mike Glennon 40 40 40 40 40 39 39.8 0.4 Tiers 1: Rodgers Tier 2: Brady, Burrow, Herbert, Stafford, Mahomes, Dak Tier 3: Cousins, Winston, Murray, Jimmy G, Josh Allen, Wilson, Carr, Bridgewater, Mac Tier 4: Tannehill, Wentz, Hurts, Tua, Lamar, Matt Ryan, Tier 5- Daniel Jones, Mike White, Goff. Siemian, Heinicke, Taysom, Mayfield, Brissett, Mills, Roethlisberger, Huntley Tier 6- Dalton, Tyrod, Lawrence, Fields, Darnold, Wilson, Glennon QBRank2021.xlsx 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NYRaider Posted January 12, 2022 Share Posted January 12, 2022 Cousins, Jimmy G, Winston over Josh Allen? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
childofpudding Posted January 12, 2022 Share Posted January 12, 2022 Thank you for doing this all season. It was great and I appreciate it! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JonMcC2018 Posted January 12, 2022 Share Posted January 12, 2022 The QB Rankings of the 14 teams that made the playoffs: 1. Rodgers 2. Brady 3. Burrow 4. Stafford 6. Prescott 7. Mahomes 8. Murray 10. Garoppolo 12. Allen 14. Carr 15. Jones 18. Tannehill 19. Hurts 32. Roethlisberger You'd have to say well done to Mike Tomlin 😃 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JonMcC2018 Posted January 12, 2022 Share Posted January 12, 2022 As for the Chargers and Vikings who both had top 10 QBs and didn't make the playoffs though.... 😶 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vike daddy Posted January 12, 2022 Share Posted January 12, 2022 2 hours ago, JonMcC2018 said: As for the Chargers and Vikings who both had top 10 QBs and didn't make the playoffs though.... 😶 very sieve-like defense on our end resulted in that, losing several games in the last minute or two. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xenos Posted January 12, 2022 Share Posted January 12, 2022 2 minutes ago, vike daddy said: very sieve-like defense on our end resulted in that, losing several games in the last minute or two. Same 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.