Jump to content

Week 11: Packers @ Vikings - GB loses 34-31, falls to 8-3, and loses Elgton Jenkins :(


FAH1223

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, beekay414 said:

Rodgers played well...when he ran the offense. He did not, when he didn't. That's an observation that continues to be made. Again, for the 3rd time, we lost because they got every single break. 

Agree with this. Not sure why we started the game continually chucking it deep (and missing) - but once AR started taking what the D was giving us - the chains started moving and we put some drives together.

I've NO CLUE what to do about Crosby. We cant keep *failing* to cash in. He's been "money" for a long, long time - now its become a question whether to bring in on the field. Something's gotta change. We need those points. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I feel horrible for Jenkins if it's an ACL He was due to be paid this off season almost certainly. We was in line to get elite tackle money too. 

It cruel to think about it this way, but wonder if we could get hm at a discount. Give him a very decent contract but not 20 a year. 

Again, going off of what I heard that it was a non-contact knee injury. Those are never a good thing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Leader said:

Agree with this. Not sure why we started the game continually chucking it deep (and missing) - but once AR started taking what the D was giving us - the chains started moving and we put some drives together.

I've NO CLUE what to do about Crosby. We cant keep *failing* to cash in. He's been "money" for a long, long time - now its become a question whether to bring in on the field. Something's gotta change. We need those points. 

Because MLF kept sending out spread personnel and our WR's aren't good enough to win that way. That's playing into the defenses hands. When MLF finally abandoned it - the offense scored 21 points on 3 possessions. Every dominant performance under MLF had Rodgers under center running the offense that is schemed to look the same on every play. Running the ball with play action. The scheme - nor the personnel is good enough for spread.

Edited by cannondale
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SteelKing728 said:

Look at what happened in 2010. This Packers team is better than that one.

To be fair, that 2010 team was missing ILB1 (Barnett), EDGE2 (Jones), SS1-ish (Burnett), TE1 (Finley), RB1 (Grant), and RT1 (Tauscher) along with a bunch of role players.

They were lower impact injuries than the players lost this year. However, this Packers team also at least has a shot of having some of those players return.

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, cannondale said:

Because MLF kept sending out spread personnel and our WR's aren't good enough to win that way. That's playing into the defenses hands. When MLF finally abandoned it - the offense scored 21 points on 3 possessions. Every dominant performance under MLF had Rodgers under center running the offense that is schemed to look the same on every play. Running the ball with play action

He (we)(AR) - take your pick - stopped chucking the ball deep and played for first downs instead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...