{Family Ghost} Posted March 18, 2022 Share Posted March 18, 2022 20 minutes ago, Leader said: ? Why would he be looking for a one year deal? I would think he'd want a longer deal, but a one year deal in GB as a 1b, or 2a type might wind up making him a bundle best year. You'd have to think of he could stay healthy his targets would go way up minus Davante. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NFLGURU Posted March 18, 2022 Share Posted March 18, 2022 (edited) 41 minutes ago, Arthur Penske said: What vet player that would fit the Packers is worth a 1st? Great question, it would have to be somebody who can come in a have an immediate impact. Don't rule out even more of a transition to a power running game. Edited March 18, 2022 by NFLGURU Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PossibleCabbage Posted March 18, 2022 Share Posted March 18, 2022 46 minutes ago, Arthur Penske said: What vet player that would fit the Packers is worth a 1st? Usually big name guys only get traded for a premium when they're disgruntled. Otherwise you're going to want to keep those guys and are going to need your socks blown off to be willing to trade them. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Striker Posted March 18, 2022 Share Posted March 18, 2022 1 hour ago, Arthur Penske said: What vet player that would fit the Packers is worth a 1st? I don't think there really are any. It would be far more likely to see them move a second or a third if they were going to make a trade (though the WR trading market is likely pretty slim). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VonKarman Posted March 18, 2022 Share Posted March 18, 2022 So we could have had easily hadsomething like 3 firsts, 3 seconds, Shelby Harris and Noah Fant plus more cap space and we decided to keep Rodgers without Adams. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packer_ESP Posted March 18, 2022 Share Posted March 18, 2022 I didn't think they would do this tbh but I'm kinda stoked... I preferred to ship both Rodgers and Adams (yeah dark ages whatever, just my opinion, I could be wrong) but my next preferred option was keeping Rodgers without Adams. Obviously this requires adding a couple solid receivers so he can effectively spread the ball around, but if we do that the offense should be much more balanced imo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Bad Example Posted March 18, 2022 Share Posted March 18, 2022 7 hours ago, Arthur Penske said: at 34? Has anyone ever done that? Randy Moss was lethal (with Brady) from 30-32, Tim Brown and Jerry Rice stayed very productive into their 30s. So it's possible....probably not at 34 but he can be good for 3-4 yrs of the contract. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
persiandud Posted March 18, 2022 Share Posted March 18, 2022 Love that Adams trade for us. Cleared ~30M AAV and added 2 premium picks. This is a +EV trade for GB. The Cowboys only got a 5th for Amari Cooper (great steal by Cleveland). We got a 1/2 for a dude that didn't want to be here. Huge W for Gutey and the Pack. The gap between Cooper and Adams is much narrower than the gap in compensation their former teams received. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laces Out Posted March 18, 2022 Share Posted March 18, 2022 3 minutes ago, persiandud said: Love that Adams trade for us. Cleared ~30M AAV and added 2 premium picks. This is a +EV trade for GB. The Cowboys only got a 5th for Amari Cooper (great steal by Cleveland). We got a 1/2 for a dude that didn't want to be here. Huge W for Gutey and the Pack. The gap between Cooper and Adams is much narrower than the gap in compensation their former teams received. That's fine and all, but the gap between the Rams and Packers just got wider and that's a problem. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
persiandud Posted March 18, 2022 Share Posted March 18, 2022 2 minutes ago, Laces Out said: That's fine and all, but the gap between the Rams and Packers just got wider and that's a problem. We'll see after FA and the draft. They have lost some players too Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old Guy Posted March 18, 2022 Share Posted March 18, 2022 15 minutes ago, Laces Out said: That's fine and all, but the gap between the Rams and Packers just got wider and that's a problem. You know we beat the Rams last year, don't you? They got on a run and won it. It has more to do with the time they got hot than the overall quality of the team. They lost Von Miller and their LT. They are going to lose additional players before it is over. They grabbed an aging WR, but Beckham is out for the year next year basically, if he re-signs. They are allegedly looking to trade Robert Woods, who they will likely get a 6th round pick for, if they can move him at all. Oh, and they don't have a first-round pick either. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlexGreen#20 Posted March 18, 2022 Share Posted March 18, 2022 6 hours ago, Leader said: ? Why would he be looking for a one year deal? Injury gutted his last season and he wants to bet on himself. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leader Posted March 18, 2022 Share Posted March 18, 2022 Field Yates - Davante Adams' 5-year deal is not only the largest ever for a wide receiver, it's the largest contract for *any* non-QB in NFL history both in terms of average annual value ($28.5M) and total value ($142.5M). A truly massive contract. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
packfanfb Posted March 18, 2022 Share Posted March 18, 2022 4 hours ago, VonKarman said: So we could have had easily hadsomething like 3 firsts, 3 seconds, Shelby Harris and Noah Fant plus more cap space and we decided to keep Rodgers without Adams. With no QB. Don't forget that part. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smidgeon Posted March 18, 2022 Share Posted March 18, 2022 4 hours ago, VonKarman said: So we could have had easily hadsomething like 3 firsts, 3 seconds, Shelby Harris and Noah Fant plus more cap space and we decided to keep Rodgers without Adams. Plus our own picks... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.