titans0021 Posted January 11, 2023 Share Posted January 11, 2023 33 minutes ago, 615finest said: He has the two most important things Vrabel looks for in veteran acquisitions. A recent injury history and time with the Texans. So this is a real possibility. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
615finest Posted January 11, 2023 Share Posted January 11, 2023 1 hour ago, titans0021 said: He has the two most important things Vrabel looks for in veteran acquisitions. A recent injury history and time with the Texans. So this is a real possibility. I’d honestly be mad because why would we pay Dhop and not AJ lol.. Unless they take on most of the contract Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
titans0021 Posted January 11, 2023 Share Posted January 11, 2023 21 minutes ago, 615finest said: I’d honestly be mad because why would we pay Dhop and not AJ lol.. Unless they take on most of the contract To be fair, I think the primary reason we didn’t pay AJ is no longer employed by the organization. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Hope- Posted January 11, 2023 Share Posted January 11, 2023 6 minutes ago, titans0021 said: To be fair, I think the primary reason we didn’t pay AJ is no longer employed by the organization. isn't he also the primary reason for our most infamous old and injured receiver though? if KT's guy is to be believed, robinson was the driving force behind the julio trade and vrabel didn't much care for it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
titans0021 Posted January 11, 2023 Share Posted January 11, 2023 23 minutes ago, -Hope- said: isn't he also the primary reason for our most infamous old and injured receiver though? if KT's guy is to be believed, robinson was the driving force behind the julio trade and vrabel didn't much care for it. Well yeah, Julio had only ever played for the Falcons. What’s the point if he wasn’t in Houston at the same time as Vrabel? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TitanSS Posted January 11, 2023 Share Posted January 11, 2023 Trading for an over 30 year old receiver on a massive contract doesn't seem like a good way to go about a "rebuild". Pass. He's worth more to teams that expect to be contending and also need a WR. Ravens could use him as a big target for Lamar Jackson. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingTitan Posted January 11, 2023 Author Share Posted January 11, 2023 57 minutes ago, TitanSS said: Trading for an over 30 year old receiver on a massive contract doesn't seem like a good way to go about a "rebuild". Pass. He's worth more to teams that expect to be contending and also need a WR. Ravens could use him as a big target for Lamar Jackson. we are just begging to add him to the list of over the hill WR's that we've had in the past. We'd get him and all the sudden he'll not be able to run 10 yards down the field anymore. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingTitan Posted January 11, 2023 Author Share Posted January 11, 2023 As I said in the other thread if we keeping Tannehill and Henry style team then we are saying we are still in win now mode. So maybe a trade for a Hopkins like deal should be on the table. Ideally someone younger. But someone.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TitanLegend Posted January 11, 2023 Share Posted January 11, 2023 Something to keep an eye on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soxcat Posted January 11, 2023 Share Posted January 11, 2023 1 hour ago, KingTitan said: As I said in the other thread if we keeping Tannehill and Henry style team then we are saying we are still in win now mode. So maybe a trade for a Hopkins like deal should be on the table. Ideally someone younger. But someone.... Only issue with trading for Hopkins is what it might cost us. We shouldn't give up any good picks as we have so many needs. If we had to trade a 1st for Hopkins I'd much rather just use that pick on a WR instead. Right now we almost need to trade back unless some stud falls to #11 (doubtful one of the top 3 QBs will). It is a risk to trade back and we probably get a little less LT if that is the way we go but it will be worth it getting an extra pick or two in the top 100. We basically need OT, QB, OG/C, WR on offense and Edge and secondary help on defense. We really need the extra picks unless we close some gaps in FA. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
615finest Posted January 11, 2023 Share Posted January 11, 2023 Make it happen YOLO!! 😂 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingTitan Posted January 11, 2023 Author Share Posted January 11, 2023 If we are keeping Tannehill or going to replace him with a QB of that nature, we are going to have to surround them with as much talent as possible. It has been proven that he can not carry a team and won't be able to get us anywhere without a good OL, good WRs, Good TE's and a good playcaller. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deeluxx3 Posted January 11, 2023 Share Posted January 11, 2023 i really hope we try and replace Bullock 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
615finest Posted January 11, 2023 Share Posted January 11, 2023 Honestly it makes a lot of sense.. all the injuries we have make me think that we practice harder than most teams. We definitely need a philosophy change Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twotonebluenation Posted January 11, 2023 Share Posted January 11, 2023 Do you guys think we extend Henry? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.