SteelKing728 Posted January 10 Share Posted January 10 3 years, with the last year being a void year @40/yr And with that prediction, reality will probably 35-38😁 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vike daddy Posted January 10 Author Share Posted January 10 Kwesi stated today "it is certainly his intention" to bring Cousins back. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PrplChilPill Posted January 10 Share Posted January 10 42 minutes ago, vike daddy said: Kwesi stated today "it is certainly his intention" to bring Cousins back. Interesting. Let's hope there is a plan (that works) in place to get the D to be average or better next year. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SemperFeist Posted January 10 Share Posted January 10 49 minutes ago, vike daddy said: Kwesi stated today "it is certainly his intention" to bring Cousins back. “We have no intent of trading Percy Harvin” “We had no intention of trading Diggs” There’s that word again. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ripline Posted January 10 Share Posted January 10 (edited) 18 hours ago, vike daddy said: dude, does your babysitter know you've been on the computer again? Love the insults!!! Nothing to say to refute the statement??? https://thevikingage.com/2021/11/17/players-played-minnesota-vikings-packers/ Edited January 10 by Ripline Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CriminalMind Posted January 10 Share Posted January 10 “Its not about the money, but what the money represents” …. = If I’m the guy, pay me like the guy “Its certainly my intension, to bring back Kirk Cousins” = I’ll make best efforts to retain Cousins under a value contract 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wcblack34 Posted January 11 Share Posted January 11 My optic nerves can only strain so much. 🙄 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SemperFeist Posted January 11 Share Posted January 11 If Belichick goes to Atlanta, the Cousins watch could get really interesting. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vikesfan89 Posted January 11 Share Posted January 11 How well would Kirk work with McDaniels? Not sure if I spelled that right 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SemperFeist Posted January 11 Share Posted January 11 32 minutes ago, vikesfan89 said: How well would Kirk work with McDaniels? Not sure if I spelled that right As a coordinator, he’d probably work very well with him. McDaniels is one of the best play callers/play designers of the last 20 years. He’s just a terrible leader. McDaniels is the poster child for the Peter Principle. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BWG VIKE Posted January 11 Share Posted January 11 19 hours ago, SemperFeist said: “We have no intent of trading Percy Harvin” “We had no intention of trading Diggs” There’s that word again. I guess.. I mean those were both different circumstances that required leverage. I don't see any reason for KAM to throw smoke, Kirk will likely be signed before the draft so there is no real reason to use a fan favorite to leverage nothing. I have to take him at his word. With that I would think it would involve a multi year, and if that is the case do we pull the trigger on any of these older QBs in Rd1? They would likely be around 26 yrs old by the time they play meaningful snaps. Kirk plus McCarthy would make a ton of sense. Take an impactful BPA at 11 and trade back late 1st or early 2nd for McCarthy. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swede700 Posted January 11 Share Posted January 11 51 minutes ago, BWG VIKE said: I guess.. I mean those were both different circumstances that required leverage. I don't see any reason for KAM to throw smoke, Kirk will likely be signed before the draft so there is no real reason to use a fan favorite to leverage nothing. I have to take him at his word. With that I would think it would involve a multi year, and if that is the case do we pull the trigger on any of these older QBs in Rd1? They would likely be around 26 yrs old by the time they play meaningful snaps. Kirk plus McCarthy would make a ton of sense. Take an impactful BPA at 11 and trade back late 1st or early 2nd for McCarthy. When someone posted that same thing on Twitter (I think it was that Eric Thompson cat), I said that there's a significant difference between a trade offer and a free agency negotiation. I'm sure there was clear intent on keeping Diggs, but when you get offered what they got, they would have been dumb to turn it down. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vike daddy Posted January 11 Author Share Posted January 11 Q: Kwesi, would you like to bring Kirk back? Adofo-Mensah: "Yeah, I have said it – I think I have been pretty consistent with that. Kirk, the player, is someone that we saw what he does to this team. I thought we were playing really good football before he got injured and it is the most important position in sports. Ultimately, it always comes down to can you find an agreement that works for both sides and all of those things, but as a player, it is certainly my intention to have him back here." "I mean, there are a lot of factors that go into these things. It is age. It’s injury, but it is also performance. How do you believe the performance will go, and there’s different examples through time. Obviously, you have to also pay attention to the person and what he puts into his body and how regimented and detailed he is. All those factors go into. But, at the end of the day, we are just taking risks, and we try to measure it as best we can and protect ourselves and ensure against it. On his side, he is trying to take less of it. That is his job and they should do that and we will try and find a place in the middle and see where we end up." https://vikingswire.usatoday.com/lists/vikings-kevin-oconnell-kwesi-adofo-mensah-press-conference/?utm_campaign=trueanthem&utm_medium=trueanthem&utm_source=facebook&fbclid=IwAR0trqv9Xn-njOQRV5EnlVoD5a3-SEh6OvxSEpTcfIgAFOnfAIk-c_C0zDc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteelKing728 Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 On 1/11/2024 at 8:32 AM, vikesfan89 said: How well would Kirk work with McDaniels? Not sure if I spelled that right T-H-A-T Okay, I'll see myself out 😂😂 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marshpit23 Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 22 hours ago, BWG VIKE said: Kirk plus McCarthy would make a ton of sense. Take an impactful BPA at 11 and trade back late 1st or early 2nd for McCarthy. This is what I like as well. Trading up for Daniels would interesting as well, but I’m having a hard time with allocating all that draft capital to move up to 3. We simply have too many holes to fill and need those picks to augment free agency. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.