Isherwood Posted April 27 Share Posted April 27 First pick that feels like a real reach. I don’t get mad at stuff like that, but generally thought of him as a 6th round type Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rosser80 Posted April 27 Share Posted April 27 Massive reach. Could've had him at 168 TBH; stinks of missing out on Trevin Wallace. Then again....everything gravy at this point because of our first 3 picks so...no room to complain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kampfgeist Posted April 27 Share Posted April 27 That seemed early for Hopper. Only pick I want back so far but I do appreciate the addition to the LB room. Still would have taken the risk on Payton Wilson 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Isherwood Posted April 27 Share Posted April 27 1 minute ago, Isherwood said: First pick that feels like a real reach. I don’t get mad at stuff like that, but generally thought of him as a 6th round type Rich Bisaccia made the pick imo 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HighCalebR Posted April 27 Share Posted April 27 Just now, Rosser80 said: Massive reach. Could've had him at 168 TBH; stinks of missing out on Trevin Wallace. Then again....everything gravy at this point because of our first 3 picks so...no room to complain. Really gotta stop with declaring reaches. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lodestar Posted April 27 Share Posted April 27 Fire Gute 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toddfather Posted April 27 Share Posted April 27 Just now, Isherwood said: Rich Bisaccia made the pick imo 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bleedforbucky Posted April 27 Share Posted April 27 Not loving it but might be a ST pick. I would have went Mahogany Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoremore Posted April 27 Share Posted April 27 Why not Cedrick Gray? We need a strong side LB and he ain't it. Biggest needs are S and IOL at this point. Well we'll see what the hell do I know. Maybe the kid can play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MantyWrestler Posted April 27 Share Posted April 27 3 minutes ago, Dubz41 said: First head scatcher. Sounds like he’s a potential good ST player and has speed to cover but I would have swung for the fences with Peyton Wilson. Worth the risk here for me. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoremore Posted April 27 Share Posted April 27 Still need more work at Safety. I would have taken Demerson. Maybe we can still get him in the 4th. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DWhitehurst Posted April 27 Share Posted April 27 Would've preferred an IOL at #91. Let's see if Gutekunst moves up tomorrow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoremore Posted April 27 Share Posted April 27 Just now, DWhitehurst said: Would've preferred an IOL at #91. Let's see if Gutekunst moves up tomorrow. Yes we need more depth. IOL need it bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Isherwood Posted April 27 Share Posted April 27 Sub 8 RAS for Hopper too. The semi-tradition of taking outliers in the 3rd continues. I wonder what that’s about. Maybe it’s nothing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malfatron Posted April 27 Share Posted April 27 Just now, Isherwood said: Sub 8 RAS for Hopper too. The semi-tradition of taking outliers in the 3rd continues. I wonder what that’s about. Maybe it’s nothing. Opportunity for a wow moment because you cant look great if you pick chalky picks 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts