Leader Posted September 13, 2018 Share Posted September 13, 2018 9 minutes ago, AlexGreen#20 said: Fackrell's strength isn't really coverage. He's a jack of all trades guy who can do a lot of things alright. He's alright in run defense, he's alright rushing the passer, he's alright in coverage. He's not really good at anything but he's also cheap and doesn't kill you. This makes sense and kinda characterize him properly. IMO his greatest value to the GBPs is as a ST animal - which has value. What we need is for those LBs ahead of him to stay healthy (knocking on the nearest wood while acknowledging how unlikely that may seem.....) cause its kinda late in the game to think a dynamic replacement can walk in off the street (that talent pool's been fairly well picked over....) or that he's capable of becoming more than we've seen too date. He's just not a playmaker on D. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Fussnputz Posted September 13, 2018 Share Posted September 13, 2018 33 minutes ago, incognito_man said: F$-# you and your civility Good example here of how obscenities obscure rational argument. From his comments, I understand where incognito stands on civility, but not why, or how uncivil responses are better than rational, civil ones. I, for one, would rather read about reasons than obscenities. Reasons are far more informative, and convincing than swear words. But to each their own. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
incognito_man Posted September 13, 2018 Share Posted September 13, 2018 52 minutes ago, Mr. Fussnputz said: Good example here of how obscenities obscure rational argument. From his comments, I understand where incognito stands on civility, but not why, or how uncivil responses are better than rational, civil ones. I, for one, would rather read about reasons than obscenities. Reasons are far more informative, and convincing than swear words. But to each their own. Lol dude. No sense of humor here or what? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shanedorf Posted September 13, 2018 Share Posted September 13, 2018 20 minutes ago, incognito_man said: No sense of humor here or what? A sense of humor requires a certain level of intelligence. The smarter you are, the more you laugh in life... Its true, you can look it up. http://theconversation.com/funny-people-are-more-intelligent-than-their-po-faced-peers-84709 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fl0nkerton Posted September 13, 2018 Share Posted September 13, 2018 30 minutes ago, incognito_man said: Lol dude. No sense of humor here or what? Sarcasm is a form of passive aggressiveness! Now go stick your nose in the corner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OneTwoSixFive Posted September 13, 2018 Share Posted September 13, 2018 30 minutes ago, incognito_man said: Lol dude. No sense of humor here or what? To be honest, your comment could be taken seriously, or tongue in cheek. I saw the TIC version, but Mr.F probably didn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sasquatch Posted September 13, 2018 Author Share Posted September 13, 2018 21 minutes ago, OneTwoSixFive said: To be honest, your comment could be taken seriously, or tongue in cheek. I saw the TIC version, but Mr.F probably didn't. Actually, I think Mr. F saw Incognito's comment as 'tongue-in-cheek' and capitalized with a dry, sly, comeback of his own. Funny how we all see/read/comprehend different things in an internet chat room! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Fussnputz Posted September 13, 2018 Share Posted September 13, 2018 1 hour ago, incognito_man said: Lol dude. No sense of humor here or what? I figured you were just joshing me, but couldn't resist the example. All is good! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
incognito_man Posted September 13, 2018 Share Posted September 13, 2018 I let us all down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packerraymond Posted September 13, 2018 Share Posted September 13, 2018 1 hour ago, incognito_man said: Lol dude. No sense of humor here or what? You had a solid post going, and then either inadvertently or purposely were overshadowed by that post. I laughed out loud reading that. Whether you deserve it or not props to Mr F. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blankman0021 Posted September 13, 2018 Share Posted September 13, 2018 11 hours ago, incognito_man said: Elliot has had opportunity. Even here already. And this argument isn't very persuasive. The odds are not in your favor regarding players not on a roster playing well eventually. It's not impressive to throw random names out there and provide zero reason why they are better. And then come back with "you need to prove why someone in the roster IS better" ? I mean, really? People wanted to cut Adams a few years ago. All I’m saying is that fans are reactionary, and even NFL GMs miss talent or coaches misuse that same talent. Im commenting on the fact that Elliot not being on a roster doesn’t mean he’s not good enough to necessarily make a roster or that he doesn’t have the ceiling to play in this league. (It probably does, but it doesn’t *definitely* mean that) The NFL is as much about scheme fit as it is about opportunity. Howrever coaches and GMs are partial to “their guys”. Elliot isn’t one of their guys. He was cut by 2 teams, and the other 30 likely have guts who are similar with knowledge of their system already and younger legs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wgbeethree Posted September 13, 2018 Share Posted September 13, 2018 Fackrell is playing like a #4 OLB. CMIII is playing like a #4 OLB. We pile on Fackrell. I don't get it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
packfanfb Posted September 13, 2018 Share Posted September 13, 2018 #BradyPoppingaForEDGE2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cheech Posted September 13, 2018 Share Posted September 13, 2018 LOL It doesn't even matter what evidence we have any more. The old 51 just poured it on better than I ever could. And it won't matter. Some people will simply refuse to eat crow when its served up on a platter. And it just was. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PACKRULE Posted September 13, 2018 Share Posted September 13, 2018 3 hours ago, wgbeethree said: Fackrell is playing like a #4 OLB. CMIII is playing like a #4 OLB. We pile on Fackrell. I don't get it. Fack has made a career of it CM3 hasn’t one game if he’s like this for half a season then fine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.