TecmoSuperJoe Posted September 1, 2018 Share Posted September 1, 2018 I hope this does help set a new precedent for teams hoarding their picks and/or stockpiling them. Talent like Mack is hard to find no matter how many selections you have. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Ramster Posted September 1, 2018 Share Posted September 1, 2018 To the bear fans who think they have a sick front seven or have become a threat! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
topwop1 Posted September 1, 2018 Share Posted September 1, 2018 1 hour ago, CWood21 said: No doubt. If you liked Trubisky coming out of North Carolina, nothing that Trubisky did last year is going to weigh much against you especially since they hired a HC who should be a better fit. If you were one who questioned him (like myself), there really isn't anything other than hope that's tying their hopes to. Trubisky last year was bad. Point blank. Offensively, I just don't see this as a team whose going to hang with Green Bay offensively. And I'm not sure they have enough offensive weapons to compete with Minnesota IF the Bears can't take advantage of that Vikings' OL. Outside of QB because we all know ARod is elite and Cousins has proven to be a solid starting QB, I'm curious to understand where you see both GB and MIN being significantly better at the offensive positions when compared to CHI? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Ramster Posted September 2, 2018 Share Posted September 2, 2018 The craziest saddest thing about this is that! Just two years The RAIDDDDUUUHS were 12-4.. With a promising young player and a avg qb.. Now they just have a Gruden. If you told anyone that Mack wouldn’t be a Raider in 2-3 years they would have shot you and beat you down!!! Wow on the landscape is so brutal. the future looked so good with RM clearing mad cap space! And now they don’t have any.. I truly feel bad for Raider fans. like why even bother watching if the product is mad diluted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forge Posted September 2, 2018 Share Posted September 2, 2018 1 hour ago, CrashMan510 said: Illinois income tax 3.75% Ca 13.3% Mack won The amazing thing is, at those rates, if the raiders spend two seasons in California, then move to Vegas, which has no state income tax, he'd still pay less over those six years in Chicago than he did in the two years in California plus 4 non taxed years in Nevada Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lancerman Posted September 2, 2018 Share Posted September 2, 2018 1 hour ago, BayRaider said: Rodgers and Von Miller both have one SB. Von carried that Denver team way more than Rodgers carried that Packer team. Denver’s defense was far more than Von Miller. And Denver can’t do anything without a QB right now. Rodgers at least keeps the packers competitive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Incarcerated_Scarface Posted September 2, 2018 Share Posted September 2, 2018 2 hours ago, 11sanchez11 said: What if Trubisky isn't that good? Then they're screwed for awhile unless they find a gem somewhere. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Ramster Posted September 2, 2018 Share Posted September 2, 2018 4 minutes ago, Forge said: The amazing thing is, at those rates, if the raiders spend two seasons in California, then move to Vegas, which has no state income tax, he'd still pay less over those six years in Chicago than he did in the two years in California plus 4 non taxed years in Nevada Cali is the worse! As a business man. Really feel like moving to Puerto Rico! They’ll treat you like Kings there.. Tons of business are flying out that way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Superman(DH23) Posted September 2, 2018 Share Posted September 2, 2018 1 hour ago, CWood21 said: No doubt. If you liked Trubisky coming out of North Carolina, nothing that Trubisky did last year is going to weigh much against you especially since they hired a HC who should be a better fit. If you were one who questioned him (like myself), there really isn't anything other than hope that's tying their hopes to. Trubisky last year was bad. Point blank. Offensively, I just don't see this as a team whose going to hang with Green Bay offensively. And I'm not sure they have enough offensive weapons to compete with Minnesota IF the Bears can't take advantage of that Vikings' OL. Trubisky was only bad if you are box score scouting at the end of the year and didn't actually watch him play. 4 of the last 6 games he had a qbr over 100 and over the final 6 weeks his comp % ~70%. He set several Bears rookie records. He played in archaic run, run, pass offense ( no joke multiple announcers called this out in game), with a bunch of #4s at best at WR. No, he didn't come out and win an mvp as a rookie. He did however put up a comparable rookie season to Wentz and nobody said he was bad as a rookie. He also was one of the best QBs in the league on 3rd down. Your point about nothing from last year is really going to change anybody's is somewhat fair and somewhat not. I can see that POV but the positives far outweighed the negatives. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JaguarCrazy2832 Posted September 2, 2018 Share Posted September 2, 2018 6 years at 141M Wowsa Still feel like the Raiders are foolish Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pigsooie5 Posted September 2, 2018 Share Posted September 2, 2018 Well, we keep talking about what’s gunna happen if Mitch is NOT good. Reminds me of Jared Goff. So what happens if he IS good? Bigger jump than the Rams last year? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nagahide13 Posted September 2, 2018 Share Posted September 2, 2018 Illinois income tax is 4.95%, not that that changes the original point much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Ramster Posted September 2, 2018 Share Posted September 2, 2018 38 minutes ago, pigsooie5 said: Well, we keep talking about what’s gunna happen if Mitch is NOT good. Reminds me of Jared Goff. So what happens if he IS good? Bigger jump than the Rams last year? http://www.footballperspective.com/jared-goff-is-the-exception/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MKnight82 Posted September 2, 2018 Share Posted September 2, 2018 1 hour ago, Forge said: The amazing thing is, at those rates, if the raiders spend two seasons in California, then move to Vegas, which has no state income tax, he'd still pay less over those six years in Chicago than he did in the two years in California plus 4 non taxed years in Nevada Without seeing how it’s structured that’s impossible to know, but since he’ll likely get a large signing bonus up front you’re probably correct. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWood21 Posted September 2, 2018 Share Posted September 2, 2018 1 minute ago, MonserinNC said: Certainly you werent expecting a Turbisky replacement in the FIRST ROUND over the next 2 years?? If anything it was always going to be a Mason Rudolph type guy. The amount of salt from Packers fans kind of has me excited haha. Basically the only logic being explained is that you have to have basically Aaron Rodgers to win......Which really if you are a Packers fan and have had back to back HOF QB's, I can kind of see how you all think thats the only way to win. Without a FRP, no. They're stuck with Trubisky for the foreseeable future for better or worse. Next year's FA QB class is highlighted by Teddy Brigewater and Tyrod Taylor. In 2020, you've got Russell Wilson, Drew Brees (if he doesn't retire), and Philip Rivers. None of those QBs are going to take them to a Super Bowl, so the Raiders paid a crap ton of money to Mack for them to not win a ring. And it's not salt. Find me a single franchise who went from out of the playoffs to a Super Bowl contender by a non-QB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.