Arthur Penske Posted March 27, 2019 Share Posted March 27, 2019 9 hours ago, Leader said: I dont post links. Why does it trouble you? So we know the source/author/link to article if we want to reference or look at it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JBURGE Posted March 27, 2019 Share Posted March 27, 2019 8 hours ago, PossibleCabbage said: I just don't like taking WRs in the first round no matter how good they are. I mean, if Metcalf really is a generational prospect, he won't be there at 12. If 11 teams pass on him, it's safe to say he's not Calvin or Julio or A.J. He's not a prospect close to their level, doesn't mean he won't be as good or better Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leader Posted March 27, 2019 Share Posted March 27, 2019 15 minutes ago, Arthur Penske said: So we know the source/author/link to article if we want to reference or look at it. Unless an oversight was made, the source has always been provided. Clearly the comment or except provided are not my own words and you can go read the entire article if you choose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fl0nkerton Posted March 27, 2019 Share Posted March 27, 2019 15 minutes ago, Leader said: Unless an oversight was made, the source has always been provided. Clearly the comment or except provided are not my own words and you can go read the entire article if you choose. Just from my perspective, if I was the author and stumbled across it, I would be bummed I wasn't getting a link or at least a name shouted out. But that's just me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
packfanfb Posted March 27, 2019 Share Posted March 27, 2019 Heard he's not running it a 2nd time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
driftwood Posted March 27, 2019 Share Posted March 27, 2019 6 minutes ago, packfanfb said: Heard he's not running it a 2nd time. good, fall to 30 or 44 pls Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norse65 Posted March 27, 2019 Share Posted March 27, 2019 I wonder if Metcalf is anywhere on the Packers board with our notoriously conservative Medical staff. Especially when it concerns neck injuries. I'm taking big men 12 and 30. There are some top players on both sides of the ball that will be available. That old saying about the scarcity of humans big enough, quick enough, strong enough, and mean enough is true now as it ever was. They are the heart of any football team. And the hardest to find or be without. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packerraymond Posted March 27, 2019 Share Posted March 27, 2019 19 minutes ago, packfanfb said: Heard he's not running it a 2nd time. Eww. Between that and his supposed abysmal interviews, he's quickly becoming my least favorite prospect in the draft. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uffdaswede Posted March 27, 2019 Share Posted March 27, 2019 25 minutes ago, packfanfb said: Heard he's not running it a 2nd time. Wow. Rich Eisen does 4.83 wearing a suit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
packfanfb Posted March 27, 2019 Share Posted March 27, 2019 7 minutes ago, blueswedeshoes said: Wow. Rich Eisen does 4.83 wearing a suit. Eisen's best time was 5.94 I think lol. Polite isn't quite that bad... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leader Posted March 27, 2019 Share Posted March 27, 2019 Say...... 1. We dont get Oliver (or IDL) at 12 (or with our first pick). 2. Jeffrey Simmons hangs around till 30 (or our second pick). Do we draft him? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Posted March 27, 2019 Share Posted March 27, 2019 10 hours ago, PossibleCabbage said: I just don't like taking WRs in the first round no matter how good they are. I mean, if Metcalf really is a generational prospect, he won't be there at 12. If 11 teams pass on him, it's safe to say he's not Calvin or Julio or A.J. Randy Moss and Jerry Rice... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
packfanfb Posted March 27, 2019 Share Posted March 27, 2019 36 minutes ago, Packerraymond said: Eww. Between that and his supposed abysmal interviews, he's quickly becoming my least favorite prospect in the draft. Another (insert "real" or "fake") injury...jeez Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arthur Penske Posted March 27, 2019 Share Posted March 27, 2019 1 hour ago, Leader said: Unless an oversight was made, the source has always been provided. Clearly the comment or except provided are not my own words and you can go read the entire article if you choose. 1 hour ago, Fl0nkerton said: Just from my perspective, if I was the author and stumbled across it, I would be bummed I wasn't getting a link or at least a name shouted out. But that's just me. I'm not concerned about the author getting credit really. I just don't see why you wouldn't put a link in there so someone can click on it and visit the article/website without having to google and search it. Leader posts potions of articles/tweets with something like " from the draft network"... what does that mean? Context is useful. Which writer there wrote it? When? etc. I just don't understand why it's hard to provide a link to the source? It's so much more useful and easy to do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JBURGE Posted March 27, 2019 Share Posted March 27, 2019 55 minutes ago, Packerraymond said: Eww. Between that and his supposed abysmal interviews, he's quickly becoming my least favorite prospect in the draft. same. I'm not interested Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.