Scalamania Posted March 28, 2020 Share Posted March 28, 2020 59 minutes ago, TDTimes said: Ruggs was the 4th best WR for the Crimson Tide. Ruggs is a better prospect them Smith IMO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kiltman Posted March 28, 2020 Share Posted March 28, 2020 47 minutes ago, Folesadelphia said: I agree that they don't seem to call OPI very often. I also probably do need to do a more in-depth look at him for sure but I was just pointing out a few of my concerns. You’re good, yeah off a quick glance of the tape I get those concerns. But pretty much all these guys have that one thing that could be the reason the my fail, that thing that was a warning sign that we chose to ignore. Even the top 3 guys have it. Jeudy not being strong and having a slightly more laid back persona could lead to him being bullied / Lamb has questions about his long speed and just how athletic he is / Ruggs didn’t really produce and isn’t like a pure talent in the catching part of things. They all have a ton of positives and upsides, but can see where they could fail for sure. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EagleBlueDon Posted March 28, 2020 Share Posted March 28, 2020 1 hour ago, Jeezla said: As long as that guy isn't Justin Jefferson I wouldn't be mad about taking him, but I wouldn't love it. I'd be fine with it. Taking Jefferson would require an outside WR to be taken at 53 or 103. That's where I'm at with Jefferson. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kiltman Posted March 28, 2020 Share Posted March 28, 2020 2 minutes ago, EagleBlueDon said: I wouldn't be mad about taking him, but I wouldn't love it. I'd be fine with it. Taking Jefferson would require an outside WR to be taken at 53 or 103. That's where I'm at with Jefferson. I think right now Jefferson and Shenault are best for us as a safety "we goofed" blanket if we trade back too far. Shenault is way more risk/reward and Jefferson is can be a solid #2 (low ceiling/high floor kinda guy). If we trade back though I think it's most likely because of a falling tackle or Love is there. Which that market is primarily Pats (#23), Saints (#24) and Miami (#26). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeSean Jackson Posted March 28, 2020 Share Posted March 28, 2020 If ruggs jeudy lamb aren’t an option I’m trading out of the first and try to pick up two seconds and draft Higgins, reagor, mims, laviska, which ever one is there. Wonder if texans would do that deal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nabbs4u Posted March 28, 2020 Share Posted March 28, 2020 I'm willing to bet no less then 6WR go in the 1st. So if You identify 4-5 you want, better get them if on the board at #21 IMO. This picking up extra picks, trading back, trading back is all good and all until you wind up having to settle on Jordan Matthews because you over played your hand trading back for Marcus Smith. If those 4-5 Jeudy, Lamb, Ruggs, Mims (only 4 I'd take)., Shenault, Reagor, ect? are gone at 21, go BPA or then trade back. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ninjapirate Posted March 28, 2020 Share Posted March 28, 2020 9 hours ago, EaglesPeteC said: I mean they tried to use Agholor on sweeps and reverses and creative plays at times but he is a turd so they never worked. I think Doug would use the heck outta Shenault. Assuming we don't get the top 3, if they traded back a few spots and got Reagor and then used the pick they traded back with to trade back up in the 2nd to get Shenault I wouldn't be able to stand up for a week I'd be so turned on. lol This is the reason I want to trade for Samuel he can be used on those plays agholor wasnt good at. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nlesthought Posted March 28, 2020 Share Posted March 28, 2020 (edited) I could see 4 WRs picked before 21 without any trade ups. I could see Howie getting scared that his guy won’t be there and trading up to secure him. The biggest questions are trading up for who and how will they be used in the system? Edited March 28, 2020 by nlesthought Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ninjapirate Posted March 28, 2020 Share Posted March 28, 2020 (edited) 38 minutes ago, nlesthought said: I could see 4 WRs picked before 21 without any trade ups. I could see Howie getting scared that his guy won’t be there and trading up to secure him. The biggest questions are trading up for who and how will they be used in the system? i think the team will try to go get ruggs and they will have him run fast. Edited March 28, 2020 by ninjapirate 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nlesthought Posted March 28, 2020 Share Posted March 28, 2020 1 hour ago, ninjapirate said: i think the team will try to go get ruggs and they will have him run fast. So the same thing as Djax? So we’re going from a dink and dunk offense to a vertical offense? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ninjapirate Posted March 28, 2020 Share Posted March 28, 2020 1 minute ago, nlesthought said: So the same thing as Djax? So we’re going from a dink and dunk offense to a vertical offense? The rumors are that's who they like. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EaglesPeteC Posted March 28, 2020 Share Posted March 28, 2020 13 minutes ago, nlesthought said: So the same thing as Djax? So we’re going from a dink and dunk offense to a vertical offense? Go back and watch 2017 games and tell me Doug wants a dink and dunk offense. That is what we got the last 2 years because the first order of business of our deep threats was get hurt Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ninjapirate Posted March 28, 2020 Share Posted March 28, 2020 2 minutes ago, EaglesPeteC said: Go back and watch 2017 games and tell me Doug wants a dink and dunk offense. That is what we got the last 2 years because the first order of business of our deep threats was get hurt I was gonna say that we didnt even have one in 2018 but then i remembered oh yeah mike wallace but the first thing he did was get hurt. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nlesthought Posted March 28, 2020 Share Posted March 28, 2020 2 hours ago, EaglesPeteC said: Go back and watch 2017 games and tell me Doug wants a dink and dunk offense. That is what we got the last 2 years because the first order of business of our deep threats was get hurt So you’re talking about the 13 games Carson played out of his mind? And that’s the norm? 2017 Agholor played out of his mind, the deep threat Torrey Smith caught 2 TDs. if that’s the case the drafting/team management philosophy doesn’t mesh with that. We had many opportunities to bring in a speed/deep threat guy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danger Posted March 28, 2020 Share Posted March 28, 2020 On 3/27/2020 at 10:30 AM, nlesthought said: That's ridiculous Tyler Johnson is a route runner who may not be a blazer but he gets open. I'm thinking 4.55 Ceiling - Keenan Allen floor - Quincy Enunwa you're really overrating the dude. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.