El Ramster Posted March 25, 2020 Share Posted March 25, 2020 2 minutes ago, EaglesPeteC said: Typical Rammy focus on the 1st quarter; forget you get outscore 26-7 the rest of the way. I was a missed 2pt conversion from tying that up. gg though Was it ever closed though? We ain’t scared! Nacho run it back! She hasn’t learned her lesson yet.’ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tk3 Posted March 25, 2020 Share Posted March 25, 2020 holy hell, do I have some re-assessing to do Time of Possession: 32.06% Lamar Jackson: 14/23 (60.87%, 95.56 Rating) for 156 yards, 1 touchdown, 0 interceptions. Saquon Barkley: 9 carries for 29 yards (3.22 YPC, 10 LNG), 1 touchdown. Raheem Mostert: 7 carries for 21 yards (3.00 YPC, 6 LNG), 0 touchdowns. James Develin: 0 carries for 0 yards (0.00 YPC, 0 LNG), 0 touchdowns. Lamar Jackson: 9 carries for 71 yards (7.89 YPC, 15 LNG), 0 touchdowns. Antonio Brown: 0 receptions for 0 yards (0.00 YPR, 0 LNG), 0 touchdowns. Courtland Sutton: 3 receptions for 34 yards (11.33 YPR, 20 LNG), 0 touchdowns. Golden Tate: 3 receptions for 62 yards (20.67 YPR, 27 LNG), 0 touchdowns. Travis Kelce: 5 receptions for 33 yards (6.60 YPR, 16 LNG), 1 touchdown. Saquon Barkley: 2 receptions for 11 yards (5.50 YPR, 7 LNG), 0 touchdowns, 1 fumble. Raheem Mostert: 1 reception for 16 yards (16.00 YPR, 16 LNG), 0 touchdowns. James Develin: 0 receptions for 0 yards (0.00 YPR, 0 LNG), 0 touchdowns. Barkley fumbled in OT to lose the game Barkley was god awful Antonio Brown didn't even get a single TARGET all game.. Is something wrong here? At least Lamar scrambling is fun Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tk3 Posted March 25, 2020 Share Posted March 25, 2020 Has anyone ever had a WR1 not even get targeted a single time? wtf? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glen Posted March 25, 2020 Share Posted March 25, 2020 1 minute ago, Tk3 said: Has anyone ever had a WR1 not even get targeted a single time? wtf? He was busy calling Harbaugh a washed up Special Teams coach 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Ramster Posted March 25, 2020 Share Posted March 25, 2020 1 minute ago, Tk3 said: Has anyone ever had a WR1 not even get targeted a single time? wtf? Week 1 chill. You have a RB playing QB who can’t throw. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bucsfan333 Posted March 25, 2020 Share Posted March 25, 2020 GG, @Scalamania. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scalamania Posted March 25, 2020 Share Posted March 25, 2020 1 hour ago, bucsfan333 said: GG, @Scalamania. GG bro Really happy w how Teddy played - actually, really happy w the team performance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malfatron Posted March 25, 2020 Share Posted March 25, 2020 (edited) . Edited March 25, 2020 by Malfatron i aint gonna complain Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scalamania Posted March 25, 2020 Share Posted March 25, 2020 37 minutes ago, Malfatron said: . Let it rip my man Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malfatron Posted March 25, 2020 Share Posted March 25, 2020 8 minutes ago, Scalamania said: Let it rip my man its all good now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pwny Posted March 25, 2020 Share Posted March 25, 2020 I've made some adjustments to the PWN and PWNY calculations. When I first created them, I tied the expected wins to the "best regular season team" having 15 wins and the lowest performing below one win. I used limited data points because at the time I never expected to track every team, and instead just wanted a measure that would give me a rough estimate of which top end team performed better than other top end teams and which low end teams performed worse. Now that it's a measure for full seasons of data and every team in the history of the league has been charted, I figured it was time to adjust the formula to more accurately represent what a team should be performing at. For example, the old formula had listed three teams as 14+ win teams, and another 4 that round up to 14, despite there only being one team that reached the mark in NSFL history. The new formula now has one team listed as 14+, with one team rounding up to 14. tl;dr: the difference is that bad teams will now have a slightly higher PWN/PWNY, while really good teams have a slightly lower one. And in doing so, the Luck number has been brought closer to zero. The order at which teams rank stays exactly the same, even comparing across all 368 teams in sim history. With that said, here are the numbers after week 1: 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bucsfan333 Posted March 25, 2020 Share Posted March 25, 2020 1 hour ago, Scalamania said: GG bro Really happy w how Teddy played - actually, really happy w the team performance. I was up 17-3. Got outscored 30-7 after that. Turnovers were killers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
khodder Posted March 25, 2020 Share Posted March 25, 2020 The Patrick Peterson revenge game!! Was sure that game was going to go against me with the return TD and inside kick recovery. Happy to get out of the blocks with and early W. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirA1 Posted March 25, 2020 Share Posted March 25, 2020 GG @RandyMossIsBoss Good back and forth. My run game was pretty bad but Stafford didn't mess it up too much. That D is legit though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whicker Posted March 25, 2020 Share Posted March 25, 2020 Well and with that, I announce my retirement from this league. I gave it my best shot, but this league just isn't for me. Good luck to everyone. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.