Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
49erurtaza

49ers trade for Trent Williams

Recommended Posts

I'm very concerned with Williams this could be our fall this season if he's not the same player.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, 49erurtaza said:

Tbh idk what we would give him I wouldn't give him a extension tell next year.

If Williams balls and gets a big deal elsewhere, we get a nice compensation pick. If the team gives him a three or four deal, then we don't have to worry about the LT position for a bit. 

I raised this possibility a few weeks ago and thought it would be the smart thing to do. 

Now I am less worried and happy we hit on all our needs the last three days. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, this is sort of a weird situation for are you smarter than lol. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, Forge said:

Yeah, this is sort of a weird situation for are you smarter than lol. 

Man its been boring this year. At this rate we will end up trading the rest of our picks so only have like 2 or 3 picks to do. 

Are we doing a new smarter than for after the draft that isnt live. 

Edited by Aussie9er

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

Was really hoping Staley would give it one more year. Now, I doubt it. :(

I do like Trent, especially since he is a former Sooner, but I really didn't want to say goodbye to Joe just yet. 

Edited by Chrissooner49er

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Really sad about Staley. I hated the pick when we made it but I was so wrong and I have loved the guy so much. I think he has a pretty good repuation and might end up in the hall of fame, but he's certainly one of the best lineman we've ever had. Absolute loss.

 

Love to get Trent Williams though. When healthy he's a top 4 tackle. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Could Staley not play LG for the final year of his deal? His contract is guaranteed so they are on the hook for his money no matter what I think.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, SirA1 said:

Could Staley not play LG for the final year of his deal? His contract is guaranteed so they are on the hook for his money no matter what I think.

We are fine at LG with Tomlinson. It's RG we have an issue with, and I think that's a lot to change over in a weird off season. Now you're flipping positions and sides. That being said, I really just think that this means that Joe is retiring. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, Forge said:

We are fine at LG with Tomlinson. It's RG we have an issue with, and I think that's a lot to change over in a weird off season. Now you're flipping positions and sides. That being said, I really just think that this means that Joe is retiring. 

Say it ain't so, Joe!

Edited by Chrissooner49er

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Forge said:

We are fine at LG with Tomlinson. It's RG we have an issue with, and I think that's a lot to change over in a weird off season. Now you're flipping positions and sides. That being said, I really just think that this means that Joe is retiring. 

If you move Joe, it will be to RT and McGlinchey to RG. Obviously moot point if Staley retires. Doubt this move is made if Staley is returning.

I was wrong, Maiocco really is the GOAT lol. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, AustrianNiner said:

 

"Restructure" 

What does that mean for a one year deal? Adding a voidable year??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, J-ALL-DAY said:

If you move Joe, it will be to RT and McGlinchey to RG. Obviously moot point if Staley retires. Doubt this move is made if Staley is returning.

I was wrong, Maiocco really is the GOAT lol. 

I agree that it makes more sense to move McG. But yeah, Joe is retiring. I think that is clear. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, N4L said:

"Restructure" 

What does that mean for a one year deal? Adding a voidable year??

Yes, most likely. One or two. Or moving to more of a per game structure that we are so fond of. 

If Staley is retiring, i don't know why we need to restructure it though. We would have enough money. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  



×