Jump to content

NFL proposes $40 million dollar cap reduction in 2020.


MikeT14

Recommended Posts

 

 

https://www.rotoworld.com/football/nfl/player-news/headlines/9662306 

Quote

NFL Network's Tom Pelissero reports the league has proposed a $40 million reduction to the 2020 salary cap of $198.2 million. 

The laughable proposal would necessitate widespread veteran releases and contract re-negotiations. You can probably guess the NFLPA's response: "Lol." The union wants to spread the hit out over multiple future seasons. As Profootballtalk's Mike Florio points out, the players have zero obligation to negotiate the 2020 cap. The "mutual duty to bargain" does not kick in until 2021. It is entirely predictable that the league is trying to spread out the unforeseen losses, something it would never do with unforeseen gains. As was the case with Major League Baseball's coronavirus negotiations, this has the potential to get ugly in a hurry. It is mind boggling that the process was not ramped up sooner.   

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What a free for all it would become, you’d see veteran homelessness and superstars changing teams for very little compensation to their former team.

 

I’m all for it, we need some NFL news.

SandyYoungGossamerwingedbutterfly-size_r

Edited by Dome
  • Like 11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Raves said:

It doesn't kick in for another 2 years though right?

Right. Next year his hit is 24,8 million. 2022 31,8 million so even by then he's not the highest paid QB.

Check this projection: https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/cap/2021/

There would be a lot more franchises in a tougher situation than we are. The Eagles, Saints and Falcons would be in cap hell. All, but 11 teams would have a negative Cap Space.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, that would never fly...I can't imagine even the majority of owners would necessarily agree with doing that, because it would put a great many of them in a bind.  Unfortunately, in the end, the owners are just going to have to take the hit to their profits.  Their franchise values won't be impacted all that much, unless it continues to happen for several years.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just to put past profits into perspective, the Green Bay Packers (only team without an owners pockets to dip into) have a 385 million dollar rainy day fund. That's with buying essentially all the land around Lambeau Field and spending hundreds of millions of dollars developing the Titletown district and revamping the stadium in the last decade. 

Now add all those profits to the other 31 teams who also have a billionaire owner with separate pockets to dip into. 40 million in losses for a year is a drop in the bucket. This is pathetic.

  • Like 11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The players are only entitled to a percentage of revenue. If it isn't a lower cap it the money will be taken through escrow (garnish) players contract

So, its a 200 million dollar cap with a 35% escrow on existing contracts (players only see 65% of their salary) or its a 160 Million dollar cap in which players receive 100% of their negotiated salaries but FA's will get screwed with lowball offers due to lack of capspace

Pick your poison

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...