Jump to content

Notable Stats and Observations

Hunter2_1

By Hunter2_1
in NFL General

 Share

Recommended Posts

Bearerofnews

Bearerofnews

Posted
Posted
21 hours ago, Blackstar12 said:

Damn is any team that comes close to the Chargers injuries?

Injuries happen. This team had a chance to win all their games and should of. But they have been horrible in the redzone ontop of 4 tds called back. Injuries havent affected that. Other than prolly Okung. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SkippyX

SkippyX

Posted
Posted

Anyone want to do this with strength of victory?

  • The Bills are 4-0 against teams that are  2-16 (.111)
  • Dallas is 3-0 against teams who are 2-12 (.143)
  • Baltimore is 3-0 against teams that are 2-11-1 (.179)
  • The Giants are 2-0 against teams that are 2-8 (.200)
  • The Patriots are 5-0 against teams that are 5-18 (.217)
  • The 49ers are 4-0 against teams that are 5-15 (.250)
  • The Bears are 3-0 against teams that are 4-11 (.267)
  • The Seahawks are 4-0 against teams that are  5-14-1 (.275)
  • Philly is 3-0 against teams that are 4-10 (.286)
  • The Jags are 2-0 against teams that are 3-7 (.300)
  • The Texans are 3-0 against teams that are 5-10 (.333)

In a zero sum league you are not going to find many good teams if this is the standard.

  • New Orleans has beaten teams that are 12-8 (.600)
  • The Rams have beaten 3 teams that are 9-6 (.600)
  • KC has beaten teams that are 10-8-1 (.553)

 

If Strength of Schedule by itself actually means something then DC is a great team because of their 16-9 SOS (.640)

  • Notice how the Patriots being 5-0 works against the Patriots and for DC?

 

You can take SoV to the next level by subtracting the losses caused by the teams you are analyzing.

  • New England is 5-0 against teams that are 5-18, but those teams are 5-13 when not playing New England .278 is not great, but its much more accurate than .217
  • The 49ers are 4-0 against teams that are 5-15 but 5-11 when not playing SF  .313 instead of .250

 

If at the end of the season New Orleans is 13-3 and New England is 14-2 and you want to say the Saints are better... you may have a decent argument.

It won't mean the Patriots are not a legit dominant team.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
john305

john305

Posted
Posted
On 10/9/2019 at 4:34 PM, J-ALL-DAY said:

Amazing......I mean three defensive TDs through five weeks is pretty damn good. But how the hell do you only score two offensive TDs in five games? I don't care if you have the worst QB of all time, that shouldn't happen. 

#FreeLe'Veon!!!!

The worst QB of all time is better than Luke Falk. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Danger

Danger

Posted
Posted
On 10/9/2019 at 4:20 PM, Blackstar12 said:

Damn is any team that comes close to the Chargers injuries?

2018 AGL Results
Team 2018 AGL Rk 2017 AGL Rk Dif
BAL 29.7 1 101.6 27 -71.9
BUF 33.8 2 44.5 9 -10.7
CHI 36.6 3 118.1 31 -81.5
LAR 39.6 4 15.6 1 +24.0
PIT 40.4 5 30.5 4 +9.9
NO 50.7 6 95.9 24 -45.2
CLE 51.1 7 52.7 12 +1.6
NYG 53.3 8 96.3 25 -43.0
KC 60.8 9 80.0 19 -19.2
SEA 65.7 10 88.2 22 -22.5
TEN 68.7 11 27.6 3 +41.1
MIN 73.9 12 47.7 11 +26.2
NYJ 74.6 13 47.4 10 +27.2
DEN 76.2 14 65.9 15 +10.3
DET 76.8 15 72.7 17 +4.1
ATL 77.9 16 16.3 2 +61.6
DAL 78.5 17 37.2 5 +41.3
NE 78.6 18 61.3 14 +17.3
OAK 81.7 19 44.2 8 +37.5
HOU 89.6 20 107.3 29 -17.7
GB 92.7 21 84.8 21 +7.9
MIA 95.3 22 115.5 30 -20.2
ARI 95.6 23 105.6 28 -10.0
WAS 99.3 24 121.0 32 -21.7
LAC 100.0 25 67.6 16 +32.4
CAR 103.8 26 42.9 7 +60.9
JAX 104.6 27 38.3 6 +66.3
CIN 104.9 28 80.8 20 +24.1
SF 105.5 29 91.6 23 +13.9
TB 109.3 32 78.6 18 +30.7
IND 116.5 30 101.2 26 +15.3
PHI 118.5 31 53.5 13 +65.0

 

Yes, in 2017, there were 7 teams that surpassed the Chargers in injuries.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Danger

Danger

Posted
Posted
18 hours ago, SkippyX said:

Anyone want to do this with strength of victory?

  • The Bills are 4-0 against teams that are  2-16 (.111)
  • Dallas is 3-0 against teams who are 2-12 (.143)
  • Baltimore is 3-0 against teams that are 2-11-1 (.179)
  • The Giants are 2-0 against teams that are 2-8 (.200)
  • The Patriots are 5-0 against teams that are 5-18 (.217)
  • The 49ers are 4-0 against teams that are 5-15 (.250)
  • The Bears are 3-0 against teams that are 4-11 (.267)
  • The Seahawks are 4-0 against teams that are  5-14-1 (.275)
  • Philly is 3-0 against teams that are 4-10 (.286)
  • The Jags are 2-0 against teams that are 3-7 (.300)
  • The Texans are 3-0 against teams that are 5-10 (.333)

In a zero sum league you are not going to find many good teams if this is the standard.

  • New Orleans has beaten teams that are 12-8 (.600)
  • The Rams have beaten 3 teams that are 9-6 (.600)
  • KC has beaten teams that are 10-8-1 (.553)

 

If Strength of Schedule by itself actually means something then DC is a great team because of their 16-9 SOS (.640)

  • Notice how the Patriots being 5-0 works against the Patriots and for DC?

 

You can take SoV to the next level by subtracting the losses caused by the teams you are analyzing.

  • New England is 5-0 against teams that are 5-18, but those teams are 5-13 when not playing New England .278 is not great, but its much more accurate than .217
  • The 49ers are 4-0 against teams that are 5-15 but 5-11 when not playing SF  .313 instead of .250

 

If at the end of the season New Orleans is 13-3 and New England is 14-2 and you want to say the Saints are better... you may have a decent argument.

It won't mean the Patriots are not a legit dominant team.

 

See that's the problem with trying to assign SoS or Strength of victory. A better barometer is "Quality wins' IMO. which is relatively subjective, but how many wins do they have against winning teams is one place to start.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
AFlaccoSeagulls

AFlaccoSeagulls

Posted
Posted
12 hours ago, john305 said:

The worst QB of all time is better than Luke Falk. 

Putting on my "Luke Falk went to WSU so I have to defend him" hat for a second - hasn't he been getting 2nd/3rd team reps for the past few weeks, then all of a sudden on Saturday night they're like "Hey kid, you're starting tomorrow!"? If so, how would anyone expect a rookie to be successful in that situation?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing


×
×
  • Create New...