Norm Posted November 24, 2020 Author Share Posted November 24, 2020 1 hour ago, {Family Ghost} said: He could say that he just relieved Pettine of his duties and is installing Jerry Gray as DC. Obviously lol but I thought it was a pretty decent answer all things considered Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GHARMON9 Posted November 24, 2020 Share Posted November 24, 2020 Just now, AlexGreen#20 said: 39th in receiving yards. 24th in TDs. 69th in targets. Looks like a decent #2 to me. Stats I cant fight. Watching him ? Im looking for another #2. I'm happy him being my #3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlexGreen#20 Posted November 24, 2020 Share Posted November 24, 2020 2 minutes ago, GHARMON9 said: Stats I cant fight. Watching him ? Im looking for another #2. I'm happy him being my #3 What else are you looking for out of a #2 receiver? Especially in this offense. If your second guy is giving teams pause about stacking the box, the mission has been accomplished. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GHARMON9 Posted November 24, 2020 Share Posted November 24, 2020 6 minutes ago, AlexGreen#20 said: What else are you looking for out of a #2 receiver? Especially in this offense. If your second guy is giving teams pause about stacking the box, the mission has been accomplished. Some one who I don't hold my breath on catching the ball most of the time its thrown his way. Take Davante away and MVS almost disappears. Solid #3 . I cant give you a good #2. I hope he proves me wrong. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arthur Penske Posted November 24, 2020 Share Posted November 24, 2020 👍🏻 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikemike778 Posted November 24, 2020 Share Posted November 24, 2020 2 hours ago, GHARMON9 said: Some one who I don't hold my breath on catching the ball most of the time its thrown his way. Take Davante away and MVS almost disappears. Solid #3 . I cant give you a good #2. I hope he proves me wrong. This. Its not a knock on MVS to say he should be a #3. He's your offensive weapon who on his day can kill teams. But he's not someone you want to be relying on. If the defence takes Davante away then you want to be able to count on your #2 and MVS isn't that kind of player and maybe never will be. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skibrett15 Posted November 24, 2020 Share Posted November 24, 2020 3 hours ago, AlexGreen#20 said: What else are you looking for out of a #2 receiver? Especially in this offense. If your second guy is giving teams pause about stacking the box, the mission has been accomplished. I think this is a chicken/egg scenario. I'd be looking for something more like Lazard than MVS. More like James Jones. A guy who can win on routes vs 1-on-1 coverage, and who knows how to read the coverage to anticipate the back shoulder throws that rodgers likes to use. If this offense had a better 2nd option, they wouldn't be playing the same heavy personnel style that they seem to prefer with just adams. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vegas492 Posted November 25, 2020 Share Posted November 25, 2020 Regarding MVS.....I thought he had a great day on Sunday prior to that fumble. I saw him running deep routes and getting open. Rodgers took the easier stuff in front of him, but MVS was doing a great job out there. I saw a few run plays where he was more physical when blocking, too. Guess I consider him WR #2A or #2B, depending on how you view Lazard. Either way, if those are your top 3, you are fine. And days later, I'm still not over this loss. It took a lot of different things to happen for us to lose, not just a fumble in overtime. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packerraymond Posted November 25, 2020 Share Posted November 25, 2020 22 hours ago, GHARMON9 said: Stats I cant fight. Watching him ? Im looking for another #2. I'm happy him being my #3 Lazard is your #2, guy has shown he can do everything this offense requires and do it well. MVS is a great #3 and Funchess/EQ will be fine #4-5's going forward. Add a couple mid rounders in another stacked WR class and call it a day. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arthur Penske Posted November 25, 2020 Share Posted November 25, 2020 (edited) 23 hours ago, GHARMON9 said: I cant agree. Great #4, Decent #3, Bad #2. 23 hours ago, Rainmaker90 said: He's on track for 7-800 yards. Half of his games he has 50 or more yards. That isn't bad for a second option 22 hours ago, AlexGreen#20 said: 39th in receiving yards. 24th in TDs. 69th in targets. Looks like a decent #2 to me. Thoughts on where would he be if Lazard didn't get hurt? Edited November 25, 2020 by Arthur Penske Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packerraymond Posted November 25, 2020 Share Posted November 25, 2020 1 minute ago, Arthur Penske said: Thoughts on where would he be minus the Lazard injury? Better IMO, without Adams and Lazard he's able to be keyed on more. MVS is actually better the more high ranking guys on the totem pole are on the field. He only needs 4-5 targets to hit 100+ yards because that big play potential is always there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GHARMON9 Posted November 25, 2020 Share Posted November 25, 2020 4 minutes ago, Packerraymond said: Lazard is your #2, guy has shown he can do everything this offense requires and do it well. MVS is a great #3 and Funchess/EQ will be fine #4-5's going forward. Add a couple mid rounders in another stacked WR class and call it a day. I'm with that. Lazard look really good versus NO. MVS has done enough bad things that aren't coachable. I was hyping him up going into the season. Off drops alone hes left 2-3 TDs and 200 + yards on the table. I would not bet on him being anything more than a #3, but lucky for us he is our #4. I love Tonyan and Rodgers has missed him a few times completely. I have him in Fantasy Football so I would know lol. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GHARMON9 Posted November 25, 2020 Share Posted November 25, 2020 Just now, GHARMON9 said: I'm with that. Lazard look really good versus NO. MVS has done enough bad things that aren't coachable. I was hyping him up going into the season. Off drops alone hes left 2-3 TDs and 200 + yards on the table. I would not bet on him being anything more than a #3, but lucky for us he is our #4. I love Tonyan and Rodgers has missed him a few times completely. I have him in Fantasy Football so I would know lol. @Arthur Penske Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40Year Pack Fan Posted November 25, 2020 Share Posted November 25, 2020 37 minutes ago, Packerraymond said: Lazard is your #2, guy has shown he can do everything this offense requires and do it well. MVS is a great #3 and Funchess/EQ will be fine #4-5's going forward. Add a couple mid rounders in another stacked WR class and call it a day. it's quite apparent Davante Adams is AR go to receiver....And if he hadn't felt the need to force the ball into him, we'd be 8-2 with a throw to a wide open Tonyan....And all this talk about MVS could have been a forgone conclusion... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packerraymond Posted November 25, 2020 Share Posted November 25, 2020 2 minutes ago, 40Year Pack Fan said: it's quite apparent Davante Adams is AR go to receiver....And if he hadn't felt the need to force the ball into him, we'd be 8-2 with a throw to a wide open Tonyan....And all this talk about MVS could have been a forgone conclusion... I mean the whole Tonyan thing is selective viewing of an out of context video, but yes #17 is clearly the target (and the one you'd want to draw up the GW play to). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.