squire12 Posted March 18, 2021 Share Posted March 18, 2021 29 minutes ago, PACKRULE said: The GB FO is conservative kicking the cap down the road will result in dead cap at some point plain and simple. I just don't think they want it and will do it. They have lots of cash stashed away, but at the same time they don't have an idiot owner who is ok with millions of dead cap every year. GB just doesn't run that way or they haven't in well over a decade. I mean the last bad cap hit was what Perry and no one sniffed him after we cut him. I get that. Measured risk is not a bad thing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Green19 Posted March 18, 2021 Share Posted March 18, 2021 Might jinx it but if they are look for a boundary CB for just a run next year... wonder if they would go with Sherman and draft a guy this year to take over for him the year after. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chili Posted March 18, 2021 Share Posted March 18, 2021 Just now, ThatJerkDave said: Isn't that probably his best bet to cash in big? Stay with the team that he knows already? Logically yes. He should've cashed in big with Rothlisberger throwing to him but it didn't happen. What makes us think it will change with another year with him? I think his best bet is to find a team with an elite QB. Kansas and the Packers are looking for a #2 WR. Use the elite QB play to propel him to a big contract. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chili Posted March 18, 2021 Share Posted March 18, 2021 I thought he could be a potential option for us looking for centre depth. He's quite versatile too should he not win the starting job. That's a pretty cheap contract for a guy like that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
packfanfb Posted March 18, 2021 Share Posted March 18, 2021 Well Gutey, put up... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chili Posted March 18, 2021 Share Posted March 18, 2021 Absolutely no chance we can get Kyle Fuller. 😄 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cannondale Posted March 18, 2021 Share Posted March 18, 2021 53 minutes ago, Packerraymond said: In a year where the cap dropped by what 15 mil? If the #1 team in the NFC retains 21 of 22 starters, that's an exceptional offseason and easily puts us right there with Tampa (who has yet to add 1 outside FA). That's the glossy shiny way to put it. Something like that will end up on Packers.com. Scratch the surface, and there are significant issues at some premium spots Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
packfanfb Posted March 18, 2021 Share Posted March 18, 2021 Just now, Chili said: Absolutely no chance we can get Kyle Fuller. 😄 Why? If he signs a multi-year deal you could basically pay him nothing this season. We need to drop this whole "we cant afford anyone" bit. It's a fallacy. If GB wants Fuller they can sign Fuller. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Green19 Posted March 18, 2021 Share Posted March 18, 2021 Amos... call your boy and let him know. Going to nfc championship games is fun. he can get his heart broken next year too... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThatJerkDave Posted March 18, 2021 Share Posted March 18, 2021 2 minutes ago, packfanfb said: Why? If he signs a multi-year deal you could basically pay him nothing this season. We need to drop this whole "we cant afford anyone" bit. It's a fallacy. If GB wants Fuller they can sign Fuller. I'm with you this time! Let's just ******* do it! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packerraymond Posted March 18, 2021 Share Posted March 18, 2021 4 minutes ago, cannondale said: That's the glossy shiny way to put it. Something like that will end up on Packers.com. Scratch the surface, and there are significant issues at some premium spots Lol we're 26-6 in our last 32....OK buddy. Every NFL team has some issues, that's why it isn't MLB or the NBA, it's actually a toss-up who wins it all. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cannondale Posted March 18, 2021 Share Posted March 18, 2021 Just now, Packerraymond said: Lol we're 26-6 in our last 32....OK buddy. Every NFL team has some issues, that's why it isn't MLB or the NBA, it's actually a toss-up who wins it all. I guess you told me. I'll wait for the coin flip to see who wins Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpeightTheVillain Posted March 18, 2021 Share Posted March 18, 2021 3 minutes ago, Packerraymond said: Lol we're 26-6 in our last 32....OK buddy. Every NFL team has some issues, that's why it isn't MLB or the NBA, it's actually a toss-up who wins it all. The MLB actually has more parity than the NFL. http://harvardsportsanalysis.org/2016/12/which-sports-league-has-the-most-parity/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chili Posted March 18, 2021 Share Posted March 18, 2021 That was quick... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packerraymond Posted March 18, 2021 Share Posted March 18, 2021 Just now, SpeightTheVillain said: The MLB actually has more parity than the NFL. http://harvardsportsanalysis.org/2016/12/which-sports-league-has-the-most-parity/ Yeah that's a link I've seen many times....and I'll never ever agree. Especially as a small market fan in the two leagues. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.