Old Guy Posted August 22, 2021 Share Posted August 22, 2021 18 minutes ago, ThatJerkDave said: I like it. I think that we expose Summers, Dafney, or Garvin so we can put Bakhtiari on IR and keep Lancaster. Everything I have heard, they really like Ento. But I am looking at the roster and trying to figure out who goes. Ento over SJC or Yiadom Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
packfanfb Posted August 22, 2021 Share Posted August 22, 2021 30 minutes ago, ThatJerkDave said: I like it. I think that we expose Summers, Dafney, or Garvin so we can put Bakhtiari on IR and keep Lancaster. Everything I have heard, they really like Ento. But I am looking at the roster and trying to figure out who goes. Yea I'm just not comfortable keeping him over a more experienced Yiadom and they aren't going to cut SJC imo. I think Ento is the easiest one to expose to waivers and get back on the PS. Chances are he'll get a shot off the PS some time this season anyways. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThatJerkDave Posted August 22, 2021 Share Posted August 22, 2021 1 hour ago, packfanfb said: Yea I'm just not comfortable keeping him over a more experienced Yiadom and they aren't going to cut SJC imo. I think Ento is the easiest one to expose to waivers and get back on the PS. Chances are he'll get a shot off the PS some time this season anyways. That makes sense too. I was probably overthinking it. I just gather that they like him more than say Hollman. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Fussnputz Posted August 22, 2021 Share Posted August 22, 2021 I'm not sure we didn't cut the wrong punter. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
incognito_man Posted August 22, 2021 Author Share Posted August 22, 2021 4 hours ago, packfanfb said: Yea I'm just not comfortable keeping him over a more experienced Yiadom and they aren't going to cut SJC imo. I think Ento is the easiest one to expose to waivers and get back on the PS. Chances are he'll get a shot off the PS some time this season anyways. No way SJC should stick over ento on the 53. SJC is great PS candidate IMO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
packfanfb Posted August 22, 2021 Share Posted August 22, 2021 31 minutes ago, incognito_man said: No way SJC should stick over ento on the 53. SJC is great PS candidate IMO. I'd be okay with that. Just not sure the Packers will be. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
packfanfb Posted August 22, 2021 Share Posted August 22, 2021 1 hour ago, Mr. Fussnputz said: I'm not sure we didn't cut the wrong punter. Searching for a vet punter is an underrated need. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brat&Beer Posted August 22, 2021 Share Posted August 22, 2021 1 hour ago, incognito_man said: No way SJC should stick over ento on the 53. SJC is great PS candidate IMO. You never know for sure, but I suspect that SJB would be less likely to clear waivers than Ento. One guy is a 5th round pick. The other is an undrafted guy who had to switch positions to get a chance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
{Family Ghost} Posted August 22, 2021 Share Posted August 22, 2021 (edited) A lot of chatter that Benkert should make the 53 .. nah. Just cut him and hope he goes unclaimed so you can put him on the PS. If he gets claimed then you just wish him well and maybe he will be available again next year if needed. No reason for him to take up a spot this year when we have a clear #1 and #2 QB. Edited August 22, 2021 by {Family Ghost} 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old Guy Posted August 22, 2021 Share Posted August 22, 2021 13 minutes ago, Brat&Beer said: You never know for sure, but I suspect that SJB would be less likely to clear waivers than Ento. One guy is a 5th round pick. The other is an undrafted guy who had to switch positions to get a chance. The other teams watch film. Ento is better in coverage for sure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThatJerkDave Posted August 22, 2021 Share Posted August 22, 2021 17 minutes ago, {Family Ghost} said: A lot of chatter that Benkert should make the 53 .. nah. Just cut him and hope he goes unclaimed so you can put him on the PS. If he gets claimed then you just wish him well and maybe he will be available again next year if needed. No reason for him to take up a spot this year when we have a clear #1 and #2 QB. The only way a third QB is on my roster is if Love is a lot more hurt than reported. Benkert is exactly what I want out of a preseason QB. I would love for him to be signed to the practice squad and watch him again next year. But just like Tim Boyle, or Craig Nall, you can let him go and not lose a wink of sleep over it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squire12 Posted August 22, 2021 Share Posted August 22, 2021 Just now, ThatJerkDave said: The only way a third QB is on my roster is if Love is a lot more hurt than reported. Benkert is exactly what I want out of a preseason QB. I would love for him to be signed to the practice squad and watch him again next year. But just like Tim Boyle, or Craig Nall, you can let him go and not lose a wink of sleep over it. what if Benkert is Joe Callahan 2.0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThatJerkDave Posted August 22, 2021 Share Posted August 22, 2021 3 minutes ago, squire12 said: what if Benkert is Joe Callahan 2.0 I think he is Joe Callahan 2.0. He of 11 NFL passing yards. Very entertaining player. Isn't such a liability that we don't get a look at any pass catchers in preseason games. No games are won or lost by not having him on a roster. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brat&Beer Posted August 22, 2021 Share Posted August 22, 2021 28 minutes ago, Old Guy said: The other teams watch film. Ento is better in coverage for sure. I think teams also remember who they had on their draft board. 81 players were drafted after the Packers drafted SJC. I suspect their were some teams very interested in drafting him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old Guy Posted August 22, 2021 Share Posted August 22, 2021 (edited) 43 minutes ago, Brat&Beer said: I think teams also remember who they had on their draft board. 81 players were drafted after the Packers drafted SJC. I suspect their were some teams very interested in drafting him. The film don't lie. Your draft boards are often wrong. Not to mention he was projected to go in the 7th round or be an undrafted free agent. I'm probably sounding like a hater of this kid. I should stop. Edited August 22, 2021 by Old Guy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.