Jump to content

Week 16: Giants vs Eagles Round Two *Now With 75% "Less" Neck!*


Nabbs4u

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Nabbs4u said:

While I'm certain their HOF QB had something to do with it given his MVP type season thus far. I'm also fairly sure the Packers didn't or wouldn't of pissed away 4-5 extra wins due to in opportune penalties and or TO's. What's the difference in those two categories compared to the Eagles, curious?

Sad thing about this seaaon is that SF, TB, KC, LAC, NYG were all winnable games without the below occurring.

* Inexcusable play calling early, abandoning the run game.

* Penalties negating not only 1st downs,  extending drives but actual TD's taken off the board.

* Game altering TO's.

* Inability defensively to get off the field on 3rd downs either with play or GD penalty

All of those things occured in those 5 extra losses above. Guarantee the Packers have limited theirs. Which is the main difference IMO. 

I’m sure there is a telltale stat, penalties, turnovers, etc that reveal the story. It’s just odd there’s that big of a discrepancy. Usually, especially late in the year, that +/- points statistic tells the whole story and most teams that are that close have similar records. Every team has crazy stuff happen to them throughout so it’s a wash usually with the weird individual mishaps or good fortunes. Just thought it was odd. We’ve played an easier schedule and have generally spanked the bad teams and lost to the good ones so that may explain our situation.  But the Packers having near identical pts for, against and +/- is baffling to me. They must be winning every close game the had. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Jroc04 said:

I’m sure there is a telltale stat, penalties, turnovers, etc that reveal the story. It’s just odd there’s that big of a discrepancy. Usually, especially late in the year, that +/- points statistic tells the whole story and most teams that are that close have similar records. Every team has crazy stuff happen to them throughout so it’s a wash usually with the weird individual mishaps or good fortunes. Just thought it was odd. We’ve played an easier schedule and have generally spanked the bad teams and lost to the good ones so that may explain our situation.  But the Packers having near identical pts for, against and +/- is baffling to me. They must be winning every close game the had

I'd be shocked and I say this knowing  HOF QB Aaron Rodgers is the GOAT when it comes to TO'S. 

Let alone Sirianni's Stupidity for a month. Just saying. 

Edited by Nabbs4u
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Nabbs4u said:

I'd be shocked and I say this knowing  HOF QB Aaron Rodgers is the GOAT when it comes to TO'S. 

Let alone Sirianni's Stupidity for a month. Just saying. 

GB actually leads the league in least amount of giveaways with 10. 5 INT, 5 FMB 

Not that we’re bad. Total of 15. 
 

But takeaways they’re on a whole different level. Which may lead to the big discrepancy in wins. +12 for them good for tied for 2nd with Dallas. We’re -2, good for 20th or so. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Jroc04 said:

GB actually leads the league in least amount of giveaways with 10. 5 INT, 5 FMB 

Not that we’re bad. Total of 15. 
 

But takeaways they’re on a whole different level. Which may lead to the big discrepancy in wins. +12 for them good for tied for 2nd with Dallas. We’re -2, good for 20th or so. 

May.......? 👌 you have your own answer. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...