StLunatic88 Posted April 21 Share Posted April 21 21 minutes ago, HuskieBear said: looks like because it wasn't nfl games? Yes, but he was "in the facility" when he placed them? Might be even more crazy of a rule than the hypocrisy of the NFL and the gambling stuff to begin with Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Madmike90 Posted April 21 Share Posted April 21 4 hours ago, Ty21 said: Jameson Williams suspended 6 games for betting on games lol. Lions’ players (former and current) CJ Moore, Quintez Cephus, and Stanley Berryhill all suspended for it too lol. How does this happen to you after Ridley had the hammer dropped on him last year? What idiots And now they have fired several staff members from all sorts of departments after they were found to be gambling as well... You have to love the fact that even when the Lions seem to be figuring it out they still find a way to be the Lions hahaha 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ty21 Posted April 21 Share Posted April 21 3 minutes ago, Madmike90 said: And now they have fired several staff members from all sorts of departments after they were found to be gambling as well... You have to love the fact that even when the Lions seem to be figuring it out they still find a way to be the Lions hahaha And you have to love the fact that even though I’ve known the lions my whole life for being the lions, them being the lions now and ****ing their immediate future was not on my 2023 bingo card Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ty21 Posted April 21 Share Posted April 21 Imagine Detroit going JSN at 6 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JibjeResearch Posted April 22 Share Posted April 22 On 4/21/2023 at 1:30 PM, Ty21 said: Imagine Detroit going JSN at 6 That would be awesome for the Bears lolz ahahahahahaha😁🤣 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ty21 Posted April 24 Share Posted April 24 No post here yet but Rodgers to the jets for a FRP swap, a 2nd, and a conditional pick that becomes a 1st if Rodgers plays 65% of snaps. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dll2000 Posted April 24 Author Share Posted April 24 Jets are stupid. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HuskieBear Posted April 24 Share Posted April 24 6 minutes ago, Ty21 said: No post here yet but Rodgers to the jets for a FRP swap, a 2nd, and a conditional pick that becomes a 1st if Rodgers plays 65% of snaps. maybe because this is the 2022 around the league thread but it is clearly 2023 rn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Madmike90 Posted April 24 Share Posted April 24 9 minutes ago, dll2000 said: Jets are stupid. I have no idea why the Jets gave that much up…the Packers had zero leverage to get a short swap of picks in the 1st as well as a 2nd this year and what will more than likely be a 1st next offseason…very short sighted. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ty21 Posted April 24 Share Posted April 24 7 minutes ago, HuskieBear said: maybe because this is the 2022 around the league thread but it is clearly 2023 rn Yeah what’s the big idea @dll2000 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ty21 Posted April 24 Share Posted April 24 How satisfying of a troll job would it be in Rodgers wins two consecutive Super Bowls with the jets? It would hurt personally because **** AR but would hurt the Packers even more to learn the reason they didn’t win more wasn’t on him Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beardown3231 Posted April 24 Share Posted April 24 5 minutes ago, Ty21 said: How satisfying of a troll job would it be in Rodgers wins two consecutive Super Bowls with the jets? It would hurt personally because **** AR but would hurt the Packers even more to learn the reason they didn’t win more wasn’t on him Suddenly giving them a 2024 1st would be easier to swallow if it's pick 32. Otherwise this trade is **** for NYJ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ty21 Posted April 24 Share Posted April 24 3 minutes ago, beardown3231 said: Suddenly giving them a 2024 1st would be easier to swallow if it's pick 32. Otherwise this trade is **** for NYJ Just have to hope GB continues to suck at drafting 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HuskieBear Posted April 24 Share Posted April 24 i don't 100% understand that conditional pick tho - it goes to GB if he plays 65% of the snaps next year. what if plays the whole year, they lose in the division round, and then he retires. NYJ still has to give up their 1st - wasn't the whole holdup because they wanted protections in case of that exact situation? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beardown3231 Posted April 24 Share Posted April 24 18 minutes ago, HuskieBear said: i don't 100% understand that conditional pick tho - it goes to GB if he plays 65% of the snaps next year. what if plays the whole year, they lose in the division round, and then he retires. NYJ still has to give up their 1st - wasn't the whole holdup because they wanted protections in case of that exact situation? Well it sounds like you understand it perfectly, but I know what you meant: "why the **** did the Jets do that?!" which I agree with. Perhaps Rodgers gave some assurances about 2024 at least. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.